Breaking News
Oprah Quitting TV Show In 2011

Dow 13,000 In Context

Because cons will use the Dow @ 13,000 to trumpet “The Bush Economy” (and pooh pooh it when the market drops) lets go over the record, again.

Dow close on Bush’s swearing in (1/20/01): 10,587
Dow today: 13,000

Change: +2,413

Dow close on Clinton’s swearing in (1/20/96): 3,254
Dow on Clinton’s last day (1/20/01): 10,587

Change: +7,333

So, President Bush has 9 21 months to get the Dow to 17,920 in order to match the Clinton-era Dow.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

13 Responses to “Dow 13,000 In Context”

  1. midderpidge says:

    9 months? Did I VanWinkle a year or something?

  2. Oliver says:

    No, I just can’t add or maybe its wishful thinking.

  3. Actually, you are probably right because you are using raw numbers and not percent increase.

  4. It would actually be even higher, since you’re not doing math by percentages. Under Clinton, the Dow increased over 300%. It literally tripled. If Bush managed to get the Dow to 17,920, which he won’t, he’d have seen a 60% increase over eight years. Your generous and best estimate has Bush’s economic growth (using the beloved-by-righties measuring tape of the Dow and the Dow alone, that is) being a fifth of Clinton’s.

  5. Bleeding Gums Murphy says:

    Sorry August, your Math is wrong . Clinton saw an increase of 7333 from a base of 3254. In percentage terms, that’s an increase of 225.35%.

    In order for W to replicate this accomplishment, the Dow would need to increase by 23,858, and end at 34,445.

    He needs 21,445 MORE to touch the Big Dawg’s percentages.

    Don’t think we’ll see it.

  6. PD100 says:

    Cue the wingnut “If it wasn’t for 9/11″ in 3,2…

  7. Hollywood_Freaks says:

    If it wasn’t for 9/11…

    Ok, just kidding.

    I like to credit the wows and the woes of the economy during Bush and Clinton’s presidency to Greenspan anyways. He has much more influence on the Dow’s closings than any President.

  8. Tommykey says:

    The Dow does not really count as an indicator of the market. It only consists of a mere 30 companies.

    The NASDAQ is a much broader index, and at its peak in 2000 it was around 5000. Right now it is barely half that.

  9. NCGuy says:

    Of course, the right wing nut jobs claim that Clinton inherited a growing economy and Bush inherited a dying one. What say ye?

    http://bubbanear.blogspot.com/2007/04/13090.html

  10. Jet says:

    Oliver, you wrote 9 months here, and put Cheney at 9 percent approval. What’s next, 9 pics of Jessica Alba? :)

  11. Quaker in a Basement says:

    3,000 dead? That’s “just a number.”

    Dow at 13,000? Now, that’s a story!!

  12. Duros62 says:

    The NASDAQ is a much broader index, and at its peak in 2000 it was around 5000. Right now it is barely half that.

    Uhm, that doesn’t help make Bush look better.

  13. william says:

    Screw the Dow. How about the tax cuts?

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070425/us_nm/usa_treasury_taxes_dc_1

    Lover taxes increase revenues. It’s a fact that Libs should appreciate as it pays for all the nanny-state socialist programs you swoon over.