Comments on: Fighting Terror As Police Action

By: fd10801

fd10801 — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:20:04 +0000

Yeah, that's it! Put Osama's picture up in the Post Office, and send the Dog after him

By: midderpidge

midderpidge — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:43:56 +0000

Doesn’t the Bush adminstration have like a .000 average in prosecuting terrorist cases? I think that explains their dislike for the law enforcement aspect of fighting terrorism.

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:47:46 +0000

No, but the point of the “surge” is that we need to use closer to the full force.

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:28:43 +0000

I like the military emphasis option

Why am I not surprised at all?

I’m starting to think Pedro is a Dr. like Michael Savage is a “Doctor.”

By: Dugger

Dugger — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:17:16 +0000

spider

We are certainly not using ‘the full force’ of the US military.

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:05:19 +0000

Using the full force of the military to fight small cells of terrorists is like using a chainsaw to perform a triple bypass.

By: midderpidge

midderpidge — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:33:25 +0000

I think we can find more productive uses for our military in the war on terror than turning countries that don’t support anti-US terrorism into states that do.

By: Dugger

Dugger — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:05:34 +0000

Actually, as I understand it both sides would use both the police and military functions. It gets down to emphasis and primary responsibility.

I like the military emphasis option

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:39:50 +0000

Do you just have an “idiot” macro on your keyboard to type out these things? Because otherwise, you’re wasting a lot of time away from your patients, fake doctor.

By: pedromd07

pedromd07 — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:30:11 +0000

5 years…no successful attack in the US

Maybe you could, you know, leave defending this country to those of us that don’t get $400 dollar haircuts eh?

But yea, thanks for your opinion