Abortion Doesn’t Cause Breast Cancer
Tweet
Science strikes again.
The new study, appearing in Monday’s Archives of Internal Medicine, looked at data from 105,716 women participating in the Nurses’ Health Study, which was established in 1976 to study a wide range of health issues affecting women.
The women, ages 29 to 46 at the start of the study, were followed for 10 years. Every two years, they were asked about abortions, miscarriages and new breast cancer diagnoses. The researchers looked at medical records to confirm the diagnoses.
The researchers found no greater rate of breast cancer among the women who reported having abortions, compared to the other women. They saw no greater risk associated with multiple abortions and no greater risk linked with miscarriages.
Damn you, factual scientific information!
6 Responses to “Abortion Doesn’t Cause Breast Cancer”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Neither does flying a kite.
But flying a kite won’t terminate a pregnancy.
Wow, that takes the cake. fd10801, that was like a dadaist experiment the way it constructed a nonsensical non sequitur. That’s enough proof for me that you’re not here to discuss, or even argue, just to reassert your narrow world view.
Michael, I have noticed that he’s just here to get attention. He must post about 50% of the items here. Ignore him, he won’t go away but at least you won’t be feeding his delusions.
“… that was like a dadaist experiment the way it constructed a nonsensical non sequitur
You have grasped exactly the function of Oliver’s post.
EL: You obviously need more wattage.
Nah.. I got him pegged.
He’s being paid $5 an hour to troll here.
That’s all his comments here are worth to his bosses, and even less to the good people who post here.
Wellstone, Whatever it’s worth, I take PayPal.