<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old Media/New Media Worlds Collide (Again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/19/old-medianew-media-worlds-collide-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/19/old-medianew-media-worlds-collide-again/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:12:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Eggertson</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/19/old-medianew-media-worlds-collide-again/#comment-76973</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Eggertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6475#comment-76973</guid>
		<description>The newspapers are stuck in the same rut. They can still make money with the print versions, so a lot of them are afraid to really go to town with their online editions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newspapers are stuck in the same rut. They can still make money with the print versions, so a lot of them are afraid to really go to town with their online editions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaker in a Basement</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/19/old-medianew-media-worlds-collide-again/#comment-76972</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaker in a Basement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6475#comment-76972</guid>
		<description>One of the targeted-to-IT-people publications, InfoWorld, has decided to abandon its dead tree version and go online only.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the targeted-to-IT-people publications, InfoWorld, has decided to abandon its dead tree version and go online only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nihilistic_disintegration</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/19/old-medianew-media-worlds-collide-again/#comment-76971</link>
		<dc:creator>nihilistic_disintegration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6475#comment-76971</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://dvorak.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John Dvorak&lt;/a&gt; is the only good thing to come from PC Magazine.

I always thought it amusing that Computer Shopper had articles. Seriously, who read it for the articles? (It was like geek porn, with all those ads.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dvorak.org" rel="nofollow">John Dvorak</a> is the only good thing to come from PC Magazine.</p>
<p>I always thought it amusing that Computer Shopper had articles. Seriously, who read it for the articles? (It was like geek porn, with all those ads.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/19/old-medianew-media-worlds-collide-again/#comment-76970</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6475#comment-76970</guid>
		<description>I have a free subscription to the magazine, which is the only reason I get it. Sometimes some of the content is good, but that&#039;s only the regular columnists who have something new to say.

I agree with you however that they&#039;ve worn out the &#039;Best Free Programs&#039; sort of issues. They just did a security issue and -- surprise surprise! -- Norton Anti-Virus was the Editors Choice for the best anti-virus software.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a free subscription to the magazine, which is the only reason I get it. Sometimes some of the content is good, but that&#8217;s only the regular columnists who have something new to say.</p>
<p>I agree with you however that they&#8217;ve worn out the &#8216;Best Free Programs&#8217; sort of issues. They just did a security issue and &#8212; surprise surprise! &#8212; Norton Anti-Virus was the Editors Choice for the best anti-virus software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
