Comments on: Hey Look, The President Lied Again

By: merlallen

merlallen — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:52:21 +0000

Now he’s concerned about pork?
He has never had a funding bill that wasn’t loaded down with pork.

By: merlallen

merlallen — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:51:04 +0000

That won’t stop the Crawford Coward from saying the troops have no money, will it?

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:41:43 +0000

Bush won’t sign the bill if its loaded with pork. He’s said so.

No, he won’t sign it if it holds him to any deadlines, measures, or accountabilities.

BTW, what ever happened to all those stout fellows who scored Mr. Kerry for “voting against funding for the troops”? Do you suppose they’ll treat Mr. Bush as harshly if he vetoes funding?

By: Oliver

Oliver — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:27:49 +0000

Won’t be able to fully drain the swamp until Bush is out of our White House.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:15:09 +0000

Heh. And just think, the Democrats were stupid enough to think that they could use a military spending bill to blackmail the President into signing over $$$ billions in pork for them.

Bush won’t sign the bill if its loaded with pork. He’s said so. Now he has three more months to let the Democrats prove how effective they will be at “draining the swamp” in D. C.

Well, get to work guys.

By: midderpidge

midderpidge — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:14:25 +0000

Maybe Bush really believed there wasn’t enough money. He is after all the incompetent CEO president.

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:00:29 +0000

“The Pentagon says it has enough money to pay for the Iraq war through June,

Hasn’t this been pretty much common knowledge for the last 3 months or so?
I knew that.
Doesn’t fit the rhetoric model, though, I guess.