Willis On The Radio #002 (Podcast)
Tweet

The adventure continues, with way improved audio quality. Issues:
* Virginia Tech & Gun Control
* Conservative radio running scared
* The upside of regulation
E-mail comments to owillis@gmail.com or call-in to 206-666-6623 and I’ll play your message/question on-air.
Audio file (MP3)
Podcast feed
Subscribe in iTunes
5 Responses to “Willis On The Radio #002 (Podcast)”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

It was ok until you got to the point where you slandered any person that is a member of the NRA as a “sycophantic disgusting nutball.”
I guess you won’t be supporting Bill Richardson’s run for the Presidency. You wouldn’t want a “sycophantic disgusting nutball” running the country would you?
I find the NRA and the way they conduct business to be morally bankrupt and crass.
Once again I loved your podcast and I’ll be a frequent listener from now on! I want to add something else that many of us, as Asian Americans, are noticing about the media coverage of Cho Seung-Hui’s racial & national identity. Why is he being represented as a “legal immigrant” or a “resident alien” when he is, in fact, an “American kid?” He’s 23 years old, but documents indicate he was living in the US since 1992. That’s 15 years ago. That means he’s been socialized as an “American kid. He would’ve been 8 years old at the time he arrived to the US. So why are news agencies still calling him, seemingly at great lengths, a “legal immigrant” or a “resident alien?”
Technically, he’s “Asian American” or in Asian American Studies terms, he fits the classic 1.5 generation: foreign born, but raised in the US. There’s nothing to suggest that he’s a recent immigrant of less than 5 years if we define “recent” in that way. He’s just as American as the next kid. So what gives???
Obviously the battle over culture is in full effect and started within a day of the attacks itself. But it seems like so long as Cho is represented as “not fully American” then the fault can be pointed to some place else. It also seems indicative of how we see race relations in the US. That it’s still in “black-white” terms and that Asians are either forced to fit in, or left out. In this sad incident, it seems to be more convenient to represent Cho as this “foreign” kid as opposed to acknowledging that this is an American kid.
I find the NRA and the way they conduct business to be morally bankrupt and crass.
Yes, because we know that the NRA was to blame for what happened at Columbine.
Good grief.
Jay, I believe it’s safe to say that the positions of the NRA don’t subtract from the gun homicide rate in the US.