Comments on: Malfeasance In Government http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: hxymco hxsm http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77480 hxymco hxsm Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:13:53 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77480 tjqweu huax terqw hsvkzo ehjrzspu sqwynha skiq [URL]http://www.crkupvsn.boqrxa.com[/URL] fiyudokb vmupda tjqweu huax terqw hsvkzo ehjrzspu sqwynha skiq [URL]http://www.crkupvsn.boqrxa.com[/URL] fiyudokb vmupda

]]> By: gqjpnc xqmovcwj http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77479 gqjpnc xqmovcwj Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:10:05 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77479 gvoijnqbr ocsriyg xomafds eoadsypbi xmuogqdj aywh ywdqtgvmb gvoijnqbr ocsriyg xomafds eoadsypbi xmuogqdj aywh ywdqtgvmb

]]> By: Kdog http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77478 Kdog Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:02:12 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77478 If this is a black or a muslin person, Michelle Malkin and "Nappy head Ho" LaShawn Barber is going to jump for joy. If this is a black or a muslin
person, Michelle Malkin and “Nappy head Ho” LaShawn Barber is going to jump for joy.

]]> By: Duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77477 Duros62 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:02:37 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77477 <i>"not gone stone cold" is code for "we almost have him", right?</i> No, it's code for "We know where he ain't." “not gone stone cold” is code for “we almost have him”, right?

No, it’s code for “We know where he ain’t.”

]]> By: fd10801 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77476 fd10801 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:36:33 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77476 pd100: Contrary to contemporary liberal opinion, "we" are Americans, and the United States Armed Forces are called that because they are "our" Armed Forces. By your logic, "we" didn't World War II, either, eh? <i>When a crime is committed...</i> <b>When a crime is committed?</b> You mean like when my VCR gets stolen? Or my aunt gets mugged? Yeah, then you go after the perpetrator. How many Japanese and German soldiers did we arrest during World War II? Don't try this World War crap with me. I was born after noon, not <i>this</i> after noon. During World War II, we pursued and killed Japanese and German soldiers who wore uniforms, and occupied fixed areas of land, with conventional lines of supply. Anything like that going on now? Yes? No? And you shouldn't call anyone an idiot, when you're playing one on a blog... N D : If I were you, I wouldn't be watching CNN at all. pd100: Contrary to contemporary liberal opinion, “we” are Americans, and the United States Armed Forces are called that because they are “our” Armed Forces.

By your logic, “we” didn’t World War II, either, eh?

When a crime is committed…

When a crime is committed?

You mean like when my VCR gets stolen? Or my aunt gets mugged?

Yeah, then you go after the perpetrator.

How many Japanese and German soldiers did we arrest during World War II?

Don’t try this World War crap with me. I was born after noon, not this after noon.

During World War II, we pursued and killed Japanese and German soldiers who wore uniforms, and occupied fixed areas of land, with conventional lines of supply.

Anything like that going on now? Yes? No?

And you shouldn’t call anyone an idiot, when you’re playing one on a blog…

N D : If I were you, I wouldn’t be watching CNN at all.

]]> By: nihilistic_disintegration http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77475 nihilistic_disintegration Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:11:41 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77475 From Frank's link: "But a senior US official insisted last week that bin Laden's trail had 'not gone stone cold'." Should I be watching CNN for updates? Sounds like they'll have him any second now. "not gone stone cold" is code for "we almost have him", right? From Frank’s link:

“But a senior US official insisted last week that bin Laden’s trail had ‘not gone stone cold’.”

Should I be watching CNN for updates? Sounds like they’ll have him any second now. “not gone stone cold” is code for “we almost have him”, right?

]]> By: PD100 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77474 PD100 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:55:17 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77474 <i>When we caught Saddam, the Dems were "Ho - hum".</i> "We"? Surely you meant the Coalition Forces, because your sorry ass hasn't been seen fucking about in Iraq and in need of withdrawal. When a crime is commited as in the case of 9/11, a logical response would be to <b>apprehend the actual perpetrators.</b> Yes? No? Instead, Bin Laden is a sidebar while a moth-eaten tinpot dictator and non-9/11-participant became the target of choice. Ho-Hum indeed. "Closer than ever" to Catching Bin Laden? When the United States was under competent leadership, It took less time to win World War 2 than it has now taken to catch or kill Bin Laden. Attacks are up 6-fold on NATO / U.S. Forces in Afghanistan since the beginning of the invasion. Bin Laden will probably die of old age instead of ever facing justice. -Yet you anticipate reactions based on yet another one of your patently idiotic strawman arguments. Nice work. When we caught Saddam, the Dems were “Ho – hum”.

“We”?

Surely you meant the Coalition Forces, because your sorry ass hasn’t been seen fucking about in Iraq and in need of withdrawal.

When a crime is commited as in the case of 9/11, a logical response would be to apprehend the actual perpetrators. Yes? No?

Instead, Bin Laden is a sidebar while a moth-eaten tinpot dictator and non-9/11-participant became the target of choice. Ho-Hum indeed.

“Closer than ever” to Catching Bin Laden? When the United States was under competent leadership, It took less time to win World War 2 than it has now taken to catch or kill Bin Laden. Attacks are up 6-fold on NATO / U.S. Forces in Afghanistan since the beginning of the invasion. Bin Laden will probably die of old age instead of ever facing justice.

-Yet you anticipate reactions based on yet another one of your patently idiotic strawman arguments. Nice work.

]]> By: Wilbur http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77473 Wilbur Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:48:34 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77473 Frank, they could capture Osama tomorrow, and the Iraqis could lay down their arms at and join in a group-sing of "kumbaya", and this administration would still be the biggest bunch of f*ck-ups ever to occupy the oval office. If you do a thousand things wrong, it doesn't really matter much if you do one thing right. Frank, they could capture Osama tomorrow, and the Iraqis could lay down their arms at and join in a group-sing of “kumbaya”, and this administration would still be the biggest bunch of f*ck-ups ever to occupy the oval office.

If you do a thousand things wrong, it doesn’t really matter much if you do one thing right.

]]> By: fd10801 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77472 fd10801 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:14:16 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77472 pd100: When we caught Saddam, the Dems were "Ho - hum". When Osama is caught, what do you anticipate the political result will be? By Democrats, if he is caught before NOV 2008? By Republicans, if caught after JAN 2009? And, BTW, his capture is <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yw62a5" rel="nofollow">closer than ever</a> pd100: When we caught Saddam, the Dems were “Ho – hum”.

When Osama is caught, what do you anticipate the political result will be?

By Democrats, if he is caught before NOV 2008?

By Republicans, if caught after JAN 2009?

And, BTW, his capture is closer than ever

]]> By: PD100 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77471 PD100 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:57:34 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77471 <i>"Might have been able to shed some light on the issues for you if you'd mentioned any of the specifics that bothered you."</i> Here's one: <b>OSAMA IS STILL FREE.</b> Want more? “Might have been able to shed some light on the issues for you if you’d mentioned any of the specifics that bothered you.”

Here’s one: OSAMA IS STILL FREE.

Want more?

]]> By: fd10801 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77470 fd10801 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:38:28 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77470 Just wanted to say that the new format is like, "Whoa!" <i>Now, if you just ditcha the captcha</i> Just wanted to say that the new format is like, “Whoa!”

Now, if you just ditcha the captcha

]]> By: RTO Trainer http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/04/16/malfeasance-in-government/#comment-77469 RTO Trainer Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:03:28 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6512#comment-77469 Might have been able to shed some light on the issues for you if you'd mentioned any of the specifics that bothered you. Might have been able to shed some light on the issues for you if you’d mentioned any of the specifics that bothered you.

]]>