I notice with amusement he said “talker” and not “speaker.” There is a distinction there, no?

Maybe when major media outlets quit giving him a platform?

Newter? I think they have “speaking” mixed up with the use of mind manipulating words. Remember, Newt is a hero to the right because he made up the word list for the GOPAC memo. Language control. He showed them how to manipulate minds, got them all involved. That was a key moment in the right’s gaining control of minds.

Some wrongly give credit to Newt for the “revolution” in 1994. That was actually bought and paid for the right’s savior.

Give him another 15 years or so and the Republicans will be ready to nominate him for president.

Maybe by then he will be finished with his book, a clarion call for comity and civility in politcal discourse entitled “Liberal Fascism”.

The guy is an emotionally-stunted 40-year-old frat-boy, and deserves to be treated as such.

Just so we’re clear, my friends on the right: Mike Huckabee was referring to Newt when he said, “some in the GOP —particularly Christian evangelicals—talk as if, in this election cycle, Republican candidates aren’t going to be held to a standard of personal accountability and responsibility for their personal lives.

“If that’s true, there are going to be a lot of Republicans who will owe Bill Clinton a great big public apology. We can’t have a set of rules that we apply to Democrats that we don’t apply to ourselves.”