<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bernard Kerik, Rudy Giuliani&#8217;s Character Witness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:36:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79618</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79618</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Clinton&#039;s immorality got a free pass from the media...&lt;/i&gt;

This is either just ignorance or convenient amnesia. There&#039;s no point trying to argue against that, ergo, I&#039;m done.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Clinton&#8217;s immorality got a free pass from the media&#8230;</i></p>
<p>This is either just ignorance or convenient amnesia. There&#8217;s no point trying to argue against that, ergo, I&#8217;m done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellstone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79617</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79617</guid>
		<description>Pathetic.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79616</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79616</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;... please explain what you meant by this if you didn&#039;t intend to imply that Clinton&#039;s moral lapses are responsible for immorality by public officials.&lt;/i&gt;

First of all, I already did.

But since you seem to have a reading comprehension deficit, I&#039;ll rephrase.

Because Clinton&#039;s immorality in office got a free pass from the liberals in academia and the media, the bar has been lowered. Now immorality in the behavior of politicians has been declared irrelevant.

Despite what you may have thought, I at no time hinted, suggested or implied that Clinton was the first President to act immorally in the White House.

I don&#039;t see how if I did not say, &quot;A&quot;, how that could ever be interpreted as a blatant attempt to say, &quot;A&quot;.

But, to each his own.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;&#8230; please explain what you meant by this if you didn&#8217;t intend to imply that Clinton&#8217;s moral lapses are responsible for immorality by public officials.</i></p>
<p>First of all, I already did.</p>
<p>But since you seem to have a reading comprehension deficit, I&#8217;ll rephrase.</p>
<p>Because Clinton&#8217;s immorality in office got a free pass from the liberals in academia and the media, the bar has been lowered. Now immorality in the behavior of politicians has been declared irrelevant.</p>
<p>Despite what you may have thought, I at no time hinted, suggested or implied that Clinton was the first President to act immorally in the White House.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how if I did not say, &#8220;A&#8221;, how that could ever be interpreted as a blatant attempt to say, &#8220;A&#8221;.</p>
<p>But, to each his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79615</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79615</guid>
		<description>Frank - You wrote: &lt;i&gt;Thanks to Clinton, immorality by public officials is fine and dandy.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;Thanks to Clinton&quot; sounds like a blatant attempt to assign responsibility, so
please explain what you meant by this if you didn&#039;t intend to imply that Clinton&#039;s moral lapses are responsible for immorality by public officials.

If immorality by public officials is the responsibility/fault of Bill Clinton, then you need to explain how public officials could have acted immorally before Clinton existed in the public sphere.

Maybe you want to rethink your phrasing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank &#8211; You wrote: <i>Thanks to Clinton, immorality by public officials is fine and dandy.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;Thanks to Clinton&#8221; sounds like a blatant attempt to assign responsibility, so<br />
please explain what you meant by this if you didn&#8217;t intend to imply that Clinton&#8217;s moral lapses are responsible for immorality by public officials.</p>
<p>If immorality by public officials is the responsibility/fault of Bill Clinton, then you need to explain how public officials could have acted immorally before Clinton existed in the public sphere.</p>
<p>Maybe you want to rethink your phrasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79614</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79614</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t say it &quot;never occurred&quot; (where did you get that idea?), SpiderJ.

Now, it&#039;s supposed to be insignificant -- thanks to the &quot;His personal life has nothing to do with anything&quot; crowd.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say it &#8220;never occurred&#8221; (where did you get that idea?), SpiderJ.</p>
<p>Now, it&#8217;s supposed to be insignificant &#8212; thanks to the &#8220;His personal life has nothing to do with anything&#8221; crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79613</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79613</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Thanks to Clinton, immorality by public officials is fine and dandy&quot;?&lt;/i&gt;

Seriously? Immorality never occurred in public officials before Clinton?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Thanks to Clinton, immorality by public officials is fine and dandy&#8221;?</i></p>
<p>Seriously? Immorality never occurred in public officials before Clinton?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79612</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79612</guid>
		<description>Wellstone, if you think Kerik is a pig, how would I &quot;refute&quot; that? By saying you don&#039;t think he&#039;s a pig?

My response had nothing to do with simply saying &quot;Clinton did it, too&quot;.

Would you have better if I had said, &quot;Don&#039;t be so naive. That kind of stuff happens all the time. Thanks to Clinton, immorality by public officials is fine and dandy&quot;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wellstone, if you think Kerik is a pig, how would I &#8220;refute&#8221; that? By saying you don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s a pig?</p>
<p>My response had nothing to do with simply saying &#8220;Clinton did it, too&#8221;.</p>
<p>Would you have better if I had said, &#8220;Don&#8217;t be so naive. That kind of stuff happens all the time. Thanks to Clinton, immorality by public officials is fine and dandy&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellstone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79611</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79611</guid>
		<description>AS you may have noticed, Frank never denied or disputed my assertion that Kerik is a pig.

The substance of his retort?


&quot;Yes, but what about the Clenis?!?&quot;

Pathetic.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS you may have noticed, Frank never denied or disputed my assertion that Kerik is a pig.</p>
<p>The substance of his retort?</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, but what about the Clenis?!?&#8221;</p>
<p>Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klein's tiny left nut</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79610</link>
		<dc:creator>klein's tiny left nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 02:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79610</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that kind of a village People meets the Clancy Brothers look?

Kerik did not rise through adversity or the ranks for that matter.  He was a detective who became Giuliani&#039;s driver.  His credentials to be chief were pretty thin.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that kind of a village People meets the Clancy Brothers look?</p>
<p>Kerik did not rise through adversity or the ranks for that matter.  He was a detective who became Giuliani&#8217;s driver.  His credentials to be chief were pretty thin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79609</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79609</guid>
		<description>Wellstone, spare me the righteous indignation.

Wake up and smell the Jennifer Flowers
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wellstone, spare me the righteous indignation.</p>
<p>Wake up and smell the Jennifer Flowers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellstone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79608</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79608</guid>
		<description>Kerik is a pig.

While NYC&#039;s top cop, he was using a lower-Manhattan condo set aside for the use of first responders to have sex with Judith Regan, his mistress!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F70F11FF3C540C768DDDAB0994DC404482&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; NY Times Story Link 12/04&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerik is a pig.</p>
<p>While NYC&#8217;s top cop, he was using a lower-Manhattan condo set aside for the use of first responders to have sex with Judith Regan, his mistress!</p>
<p><a href="http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F70F11FF3C540C768DDDAB0994DC404482" rel="nofollow"> NY Times Story Link 12/04</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79607</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79607</guid>
		<description>Conspiracy to commit wiretapping? Izzat still a crime?

I thought it was open season, because you never know when somebody on the line will be a terr&#039;ist dumb enough to discuss their plans in English over an unsecured channel.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conspiracy to commit wiretapping? Izzat still a crime?</p>
<p>I thought it was open season, because you never know when somebody on the line will be a terr&#8217;ist dumb enough to discuss their plans in English over an unsecured channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith houlihan</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79606</link>
		<dc:creator>keith houlihan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 08:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79606</guid>
		<description>Kerik is a man who rose through adversity and kept NYC safe and assisted in it becoming a model for transformation.  He did nothing that is not done by EVERY politician in this country.  It&#039;s a shame because the two who should be persued by the feds for RICCO and extortion are bush and cheney!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerik is a man who rose through adversity and kept NYC safe and assisted in it becoming a model for transformation.  He did nothing that is not done by EVERY politician in this country.  It&#8217;s a shame because the two who should be persued by the feds for RICCO and extortion are bush and cheney!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/31/bernard-kerik-rudy-giulianis-character-witness/#comment-79605</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 02:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6627#comment-79605</guid>
		<description>Should Kerik be indicted Giuliani will have his hands full answering questions about his close relationship with Kerik instead of the issues that he wants to address. Not a positive development for Giuliani&#039;s Presidential hopes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should Kerik be indicted Giuliani will have his hands full answering questions about his close relationship with Kerik instead of the issues that he wants to address. Not a positive development for Giuliani&#8217;s Presidential hopes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
