Yes,she’s savy and speaks well but there is something missing and not quite right about her.If you take a close look at her actions during the Red Eye show,you can see that she’s still got some issues that need to be taken care of.

That’s not to say that she can’t resolve any of them,yet Fox news is going much too quickly in order to give her a show of her own.

Should Marsden encounter difficulties,it will be as if Fox news never even heard of her before.

She is fair game because she so effortlessly attacks other but I don’t feel she has the confidence yet to confront her past.

…

Sigh.

Personal, as you are using it, means private. You are changing the meaning of the word mid-argument, (from private life to pertaining to an individual), you can’t do that. It’s called equivocation.

“I am trying to hurt you, or punish you, am I not?”

Again, you are changing the meaning of the word from, “a penalty that is imposed on somebody for wrongdoing” to, “rough treatment.”

“You don’t really believe that those two ideas belong together, do you?”

Yes. I believe you should not make moral judgements against someone, especially if you are guilty of the same ’sin.’ I think you know someone else who thinks that was as well.

For example …
If someone is running for office and is having an affair, I don’t care, it’s their personal, (i.e. private), life.

On the other hand, if someone is running for office and part of his platform is attacking Bill Clinton for the whole Lewinsky scandal, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME HAVING AN AFFAIR OF HIS OWN, then it matters. It’s not the affair that matters, it’s the hypocrisy that matters.

“Would you be willing to say, …”

Yes. That’s exactly what I’m willing to say.

“Why would someone choose to do that?”

Because it is justice. If you think the private lives of others are fair game, then your private life is as well.

“Do you really mean that Salon is not responsible for publishing those details, but Marsden is?”

If I can commit of little equivocation of my own…

1.) Marsden is responsible for the actions and events described in the story. I.E. she was the agent or cause.

2.) Salon was being responsible for printing the article. I.E. worthy of trust. It is their job to point out the hypocrisies of politcal pundits.

If you are charged with a crime, it isn’t personal. It’s a matter of public record.

Are you stupid or stubborn?
If something happens to you, that’s personal.What’s the matter with you? Personal doesn’t mean “non – public”.

I have to believe that you’re being argumentative for its own sake.

How is it punishment to reprint something that is in public record?
You can’t possibly not know the answer to that question.

If you’re running for City Councilman, and I publish a Court record that you bribed a building inspector a decade before, I am trying to hurt you, or punish you, am I not?

You don’t want these details of your life discussed, then you don’t talk about other people’s lives the same way.

You don’t really believe that those two ideas belong together, do you?

Would you be willing to say, “If you criticize another person for their particular acts, and you have ever committed those acts, then you can expect that those acts will be discovered and made public?

Why?

Why would someone choose to do that?

Do you really mean that Salon is not responsible for publishing those details, but Marsden is?

No, you don’t…

You want me to stop calling you a moron? Then stop acting like one.

“Maybe your lefty chums are impressed, but I think you’re a jerk.”

Don’t care. I’d rather be a jerk than a moron.

“Intimate doesn’t mean “private” you nitwit; it means “personal”.”

If you are charged with a crime, it isn’t personal. It’s a matter of public record.

“Being a hypocrite may be a bitch — but it’s not punishable by you, or Salon.”

How is it punishment to reprint something that is in public record? You don’t want these details of your life discussed, then you don’t talk about other people’s lives the same way.

C’mon, Rex! If I’m up in the middle of the night, and I’m not watching a movie (and that’s rare), then I might, just might, watch that show. Do I care if she was arrested for tipping cows, and she’s talking about the dairy industry? Or if he was convicted of kidnapping, and now he’s talking about parenting skills?

Hell, no! Most of those people — and that includes Maher and Stewart — are trying too hard too be funny while being topical, to be good at either.

It’s insulting of all three producers to inflict these yahoos on our impressionable youth.

You know, like you — just kidding, just kidding…

Step back from the keyboard — I was only kidding.

Fine then, you want a more practical example? A Dentist and His Teeth. Not only that, but a Dentist whose Teeth are in such condition as to be a matter of Public Record.

Not way ahead — but ahead.

C.S. Strowbridge: Back to the “moron” bit again? Maybe your lefty chums are impressed, but I think you’re a jerk.
Intimate doesn’t mean “private” you nitwit; it means “personal”.
Being a hypocrite may be a bitch — but it’s not punishable by you, or Salon.

In a Lithium-Librium cocktail kinda way, I guess.

Moron Frank
“you get intimate details of your entire life exposed?

That’s some penalty!”

Two points:

1.) Yeah. Being a hypocrite is a bitch.

2.) Intimate details? It’s a matter of law. If you get charged with a crime, it is a matter of public record. It’s not like the guy dug through her trash.

If you’ve made espousing moral judgements on people your profession then yes, your own moral history should come under pretty damn heavy scrutiny. Look, if I were an auto mechanic, before giving me your business wouldnt you want to know what kind of condition I keep my own car in?

That’s some penalty!

I think he lost a lot of creditbility with the left after that… incident. That’s certainly the case with me.

Not in that picture, pal. Why is it whenever a woman wears her hair down, she’s suddenly “hot”?

That’s the freaky part, Frank already said that even if everything was true, it is still a smear job.

If you stand up and say, ‘Liberals are immoral.’ then your personal life becomes fair game. That’s what has happened here.

Our crazies don’t tend to get their own talk shows on radio or become media darlings.

I assure you, every time I respond to you I know and admit I’m just wasting my time.

- A surefire recipe for a double-decker shit sandwich. Fuck FOX and their Wal-Mart grade journalism/infotainment swamp.

FD123Q$RT%R-whatever sez that the Salon artice is a smear piece. Ah- No.
When you are guilty of criminal harassment, leaving “vindictive and threatening” messages, working under a false name, and grossly padding a resume -well, you don’t need a smear piece.

But go ahead, start yelling ‘Chappaquiddick’ and ‘Macy Park’. Man, that never gets old..

She is pretty -on the outside, butt-fugly on the inside. I wouldn’t nail her with a stolen dick -not even Ann Coulters.