That’s “Quaint”*
Tweet
I actually agree with his conclusion here, but I know I’m not the only one who thinks it’s hilarious that Bush administration apologist and cheerleader Hugh Hewitt has all of a sudden rediscovered The Geneva Conventions.
* (While Alberto Gonzales served as White House counsel he called the Geneva Conventions "quaint" in a document that eventually helped justify the torture at Abu Ghraib)
8 Responses to “That’s “Quaint”*”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Sigh.
I think it’s hilarious that Oliver has conflated a right wing blogger with the Bush administration, and can’t even tell us where Hewitt agreed with Gonzalez.
“Tail Gunner” Joe never had as big a paint brush.
I’ll bet the current administration has never condemned school truancy, either.
It’s amazing. The howling over the “poor treatment” of this British soldier. The fantasy land right-wingers live in must be a fantastic place.
We TORTURED AND KILLED INNOCENT CIVILIANS THAT WE CAPTURED!! We did it as a matter of POLICY! We argued that this was a double-sided coin and that OUR people are endangered by that behavior and NOW we’re bitching about a British sailor in an Islamic dress? WTF?
How bad, how absolutely HIDEOUS would it makes us look when/if these Brits are returned unharmed? When they report the were treated with the basic human decency and respect dictated in the Geneva Conventions. When WE were the ones attach electrodes to mens genitals and parading them around naked with panties on their heads and taking picturs of it?
I swear, we’ve lost our very souls.
This has to be case 593,201 of a wingnut who rushes to judge an offical enemy by using international law as a barometer. Never mind what’s going on over at Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib!
If Hewitts tits were only brains…
Oliver, what conclusion do you agree with? I really didn’t see one there.
And wearing a head scarf is still better than wearing someone else’s skanky undies on your head.
Frank, as usual, lost and tiptoeing down some strange alley looking for his keys…
LOL!
I don’t agree with his conclusion.
We put our prisoners in ridiculous orange jumpsuits. Why is issuing a prisoner an acceptable uniform of your ethnic choice violating the Geneva Convention? The outfit seems to be modest and plain.
You know, as I think on this, it seems a little bit racist that some of you find modest cultural apparel to be ridiculous to the point of violating the Geneva conventions.