<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress Tackles The Tough Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Janus Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79965</link>
		<dc:creator>Janus Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 04:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79965</guid>
		<description>Daniels&#039;s Law: As Bushvoters discussion grows longer, the probability of references to The Clenis approaches one. (With apologies to Mike Godwin.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniels&#8217;s Law: As Bushvoters discussion grows longer, the probability of references to The Clenis approaches one. (With apologies to Mike Godwin.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79964</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79964</guid>
		<description>Religion in the Senate? Eyeeeew!
What next? Blowjobs in the White House?
&lt;i&gt;Heh&lt;/i&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Religion in the Senate? Eyeeeew!<br />
What next? Blowjobs in the White House?<br />
<i>Heh</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janus Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79963</link>
		<dc:creator>Janus Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79963</guid>
		<description>Oliver, you have aimed the wrong way. We want to encourage more Republican denominational public prayer on government property, film it, and broadcast it. Getting in their way would be like asking them not to say macaca, not to wave confederate flags, and not to tell incredibly stupid lies. We want to see more like...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iapprovethismessiah.com/2004/06/this-really-happened-at-senate-office.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This really happened at the Senate office building&lt;/a&gt;.   As some people say, &quot;It&#039;s not like Congress is setting up the National Church of Robertson.&quot;
With more and more of this, even Bushvoters start, if not to think, at least to have second thoughts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver, you have aimed the wrong way. We want to encourage more Republican denominational public prayer on government property, film it, and broadcast it. Getting in their way would be like asking them not to say macaca, not to wave confederate flags, and not to tell incredibly stupid lies. We want to see more like&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.iapprovethismessiah.com/2004/06/this-really-happened-at-senate-office.html" rel="nofollow">This really happened at the Senate office building</a>.   As some people say, &#8220;It&#8217;s not like Congress is setting up the National Church of Robertson.&#8221;<br />
With more and more of this, even Bushvoters start, if not to think, at least to have second thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79962</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79962</guid>
		<description>SpiderJ: You asked a silly question. I gave you a reasonable  answer. You made an even siller demand. End of game.

Well, frameone, I only know a few Christian conservatives, and they&#039;ve never hurt me. But I know the secret handshake.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpiderJ: You asked a silly question. I gave you a reasonable  answer. You made an even siller demand. End of game.</p>
<p>Well, frameone, I only know a few Christian conservatives, and they&#8217;ve never hurt me. But I know the secret handshake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79961</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79961</guid>
		<description>&quot;You&#039;re troubled by it. Don&#039;t be.&quot;

Because I know that Christian conservatives have the best interests of the country and myself at heart. Right, frank.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re troubled by it. Don&#8217;t be.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because I know that Christian conservatives have the best interests of the country and myself at heart. Right, frank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79960</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79960</guid>
		<description>You &quot;answered&quot; my question without providing an actual answer. Bravo.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You &#8220;answered&#8221; my question without providing an actual answer. Bravo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79959</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79959</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Doesn&#039;t prove anything...&lt;/i&gt; I never said it did. You asked a question. I answered it.

frameone: You&#039;re troubled by it. Don&#039;t be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Doesn&#8217;t prove anything&#8230;</i> I never said it did. You asked a question. I answered it.</p>
<p>frameone: You&#8217;re troubled by it. Don&#8217;t be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79958</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79958</guid>
		<description>The point being is that I have never said what these asshats are doing is unconstitutional, only that it&#039;s troubling. Which it is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point being is that I have never said what these asshats are doing is unconstitutional, only that it&#8217;s troubling. Which it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79957</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79957</guid>
		<description>Frank, And I&#039;m not suggesting that these guys are making a law to establish a religion. They are, however, clearly in contempt of the idea that they can&#039;t -- and they are lawmakers.

These guys are advocating a particular religion over all others as the only one capable of &quot;saving&quot; the nation. That&#039;s troubling, frank, and it&#039;s a very different from putting &quot;In God We Trust&quot; on our currency (although I don&#039;t think we should be doing that either) as God is a rather vague concept that cuts across a variety of different faiths. You put Jesus on there and you got a big problem.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, And I&#8217;m not suggesting that these guys are making a law to establish a religion. They are, however, clearly in contempt of the idea that they can&#8217;t &#8212; and they are lawmakers.</p>
<p>These guys are advocating a particular religion over all others as the only one capable of &#8220;saving&#8221; the nation. That&#8217;s troubling, frank, and it&#8217;s a very different from putting &#8220;In God We Trust&#8221; on our currency (although I don&#8217;t think we should be doing that either) as God is a rather vague concept that cuts across a variety of different faiths. You put Jesus on there and you got a big problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79956</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79956</guid>
		<description>Frank - Nice quote. Doesn&#039;t prove anything, unless John Winthrop got God&#039;s name on the contract he  believes he signed.

The world is full of nations who believe that God finds them most worthy. But considering the nationalistic asshats running those nations and the pure Goodness that is God, I&#039;d consider it more likely that God doesn&#039;t favor any of them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank &#8211; Nice quote. Doesn&#8217;t prove anything, unless John Winthrop got God&#8217;s name on the contract he  believes he signed.</p>
<p>The world is full of nations who believe that God finds them most worthy. But considering the nationalistic asshats running those nations and the pure Goodness that is God, I&#8217;d consider it more likely that God doesn&#8217;t favor any of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79955</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79955</guid>
		<description>frameone: I don&#039;t care to argue the issue of &quot;separation of Church and State&quot; all day.

The First Amendment to the Constitution says, &quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...&quot;

It does not say the government shall in no wise engage in any religious activity, or acquire any religious trappings.

To make no law respecting an establishment means what it says: Congress shall make no law favoring a religious denomination or congregation (the 18th Century definition of &quot;establishment.&quot;

It was never understood by the Founding Fathers that the government was to be religion - free.

If it was determined to be so by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;in&lt;/i&gt; the Constitution.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frameone: I don&#8217;t care to argue the issue of &#8220;separation of Church and State&#8221; all day.</p>
<p>The First Amendment to the Constitution says, &#8220;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It does not say the government shall in no wise engage in any religious activity, or acquire any religious trappings.</p>
<p>To make no law respecting an establishment means what it says: Congress shall make no law favoring a religious denomination or congregation (the 18th Century definition of &#8220;establishment.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was never understood by the Founding Fathers that the government was to be religion &#8211; free.</p>
<p>If it was determined to be so by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s <i>in</i> the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79954</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79954</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don&#039;t believe that government has a mandate to be &#039;religion - free&#039;.&quot;

But Frank, our &lt;i&gt;government&lt;/i&gt; does have a mandate to be religion free. It&#039;s called the Constitution.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t believe that government has a mandate to be &#8216;religion &#8211; free&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>But Frank, our <i>government</i> does have a mandate to be religion free. It&#8217;s called the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79953</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Instead, I am curious to know whether you approve or disapprove of a Congressperson exhorting each American to &quot;pray for five minutes&quot; so that God may continue to grant the U.S. with his favor.&lt;/i&gt;
Personally, I&#039;d rather hear them say, &quot;We&#039;re going to ask God&#039;s help to keep us from acting like a bunch of horse&#039;s asses&quot;. But I don&#039;t expect that to happen anytime real soon. I also think it&#039;s wrong for them to call themselves &#039;non-denominational&#039;, when there are some denominations that don&#039;t believe what they believe -- like praying to Jesus.
But do I &quot;disapprove&quot;? No, I believe that &quot;live and let live&quot; applies even to Congressmen, and  I don&#039;t believe that government has a mandate to be &#039;religion - free&#039;.

I think that this is the root of Oliver&#039;s and frameone&#039;s objection, and I disagree.

SpiderJ: I believe the deal was entered into here:&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;John Winthrop (1588–1649)&lt;/b&gt;
For we must consider that we shall be as a City upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us. Soe that if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and so cause him to withdraw his present help from us, we shall be made a story and a byword throughout the world.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Instead, I am curious to know whether you approve or disapprove of a Congressperson exhorting each American to &#8220;pray for five minutes&#8221; so that God may continue to grant the U.S. with his favor.</i><br />
Personally, I&#8217;d rather hear them say, &#8220;We&#8217;re going to ask God&#8217;s help to keep us from acting like a bunch of horse&#8217;s asses&#8221;. But I don&#8217;t expect that to happen anytime real soon. I also think it&#8217;s wrong for them to call themselves &#8216;non-denominational&#8217;, when there are some denominations that don&#8217;t believe what they believe &#8212; like praying to Jesus.<br />
But do I &#8220;disapprove&#8221;? No, I believe that &#8220;live and let live&#8221; applies even to Congressmen, and  I don&#8217;t believe that government has a mandate to be &#8216;religion &#8211; free&#8217;.</p>
<p>I think that this is the root of Oliver&#8217;s and frameone&#8217;s objection, and I disagree.</p>
<p>SpiderJ: I believe the deal was entered into here:<br />
<blockquote><i><b>John Winthrop (1588–1649)</b><br />
For we must consider that we shall be as a City upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us. Soe that if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and so cause him to withdraw his present help from us, we shall be made a story and a byword throughout the world.</i></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nihilistic_disintegration</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79952</link>
		<dc:creator>nihilistic_disintegration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79952</guid>
		<description>The real question is, how can anybody take the Republican party seriously anymore? After what, four years of exclusive Republican rule, only Jesus can save us?

How bad did they screw things up that the only way &lt;i&gt;they&lt;/i&gt; can think of fixing their mess is to pray to Jesus?

Worst. Party. Ever.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question is, how can anybody take the Republican party seriously anymore? After what, four years of exclusive Republican rule, only Jesus can save us?</p>
<p>How bad did they screw things up that the only way <i>they</i> can think of fixing their mess is to pray to Jesus?</p>
<p>Worst. Party. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79951</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79951</guid>
		<description>These lawmakers sure make an awful lot of presumptions about God.

(a) God &quot;favors&quot; the United States.

(b) God will just take away his favor if we do not subscribe to the Christian faith.

(c) God&#039;s favor will &quot;save the nation.&quot;

(d) That the ways in which God chooses to &quot;save the nation&quot; will be to these lawmakers&#039; liking.

I&#039;d love to sit down with these fellas to have a long conversation about their close personal friend the Almighty. Boy, would I have questions:

&lt;i&gt;We&#039;ve only existed for 200-odd years. Who was your most favored nation before that? When did we finally merit favored status? What did the other nations do to lose your favor?&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These lawmakers sure make an awful lot of presumptions about God.</p>
<p>(a) God &#8220;favors&#8221; the United States.</p>
<p>(b) God will just take away his favor if we do not subscribe to the Christian faith.</p>
<p>(c) God&#8217;s favor will &#8220;save the nation.&#8221;</p>
<p>(d) That the ways in which God chooses to &#8220;save the nation&#8221; will be to these lawmakers&#8217; liking.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to sit down with these fellas to have a long conversation about their close personal friend the Almighty. Boy, would I have questions:</p>
<p><i>We&#8217;ve only existed for 200-odd years. Who was your most favored nation before that? When did we finally merit favored status? What did the other nations do to lose your favor?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z adura</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79950</link>
		<dc:creator>z adura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79950</guid>
		<description>Frank,
Let&#039;s not engage in a biblical discussion.  Instead, I am curious to know whether you approve or disapprove of a Congressperson exhorting each American to &quot;pray for five minutes&quot; so that God may continue to grant the U.S. with his favor.  In my religious tradition, both public prayers and prayers of petition are deeply heretical.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,<br />
Let&#8217;s not engage in a biblical discussion.  Instead, I am curious to know whether you approve or disapprove of a Congressperson exhorting each American to &#8220;pray for five minutes&#8221; so that God may continue to grant the U.S. with his favor.  In my religious tradition, both public prayers and prayers of petition are deeply heretical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderJ</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79949</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79949</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;has no more authority than Pat Robertson&lt;/i&gt;

Well, there&#039;s authority, and there&#039;s influence.

Pat Robertson, James Dobson, Jerry Falwell et al have little &quot;authority&quot; in government or the GOP.

Their &quot;influence,&quot; however, is another story.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>has no more authority than Pat Robertson</i></p>
<p>Well, there&#8217;s authority, and there&#8217;s influence.</p>
<p>Pat Robertson, James Dobson, Jerry Falwell et al have little &#8220;authority&#8221; in government or the GOP.</p>
<p>Their &#8220;influence,&#8221; however, is another story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79948</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79948</guid>
		<description>&quot;I see the insults are beginning to creep in.&quot;

Whatever frank.

It is unsettling to me for a bunch of lawmakers to make a direct, political link between jesus and running this country. These guys believe that a belief in jesus is the only way to &quot;save&quot; this country and they are in a position to enact that belief into law. Events like this suggest to me that they would if they could which reveals a fundamental contempt for the principle&#039;s behind the constitution. In other words, they don&#039;t respect the principle of separating church and state, they see it as an impasse to &quot;saving the nation.&quot; That&#039;s a problem.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I see the insults are beginning to creep in.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whatever frank.</p>
<p>It is unsettling to me for a bunch of lawmakers to make a direct, political link between jesus and running this country. These guys believe that a belief in jesus is the only way to &#8220;save&#8221; this country and they are in a position to enact that belief into law. Events like this suggest to me that they would if they could which reveals a fundamental contempt for the principle&#8217;s behind the constitution. In other words, they don&#8217;t respect the principle of separating church and state, they see it as an impasse to &#8220;saving the nation.&#8221; That&#8217;s a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fd10801</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79947</link>
		<dc:creator>fd10801</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79947</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Then again, a lot of Americans aren&#039;t and don&#039;t.&lt;/i&gt;
That doesn&#039;t seem to be a problem to me.

A Congressman suggesting to me that our nation is in peril unless we pray to Jesus has no more authority than Pat Robertson, or my next door neighbor. I believe in, and follow, who I choose.

You have yet to explain what &quot;troubles&quot; you, as if somehow that is self - explanatory. Shedding some light on the political purpose of this meeting would be helpful, too.

I see the insults are beginning to creep in. If you want me to participate in this discussion, you should stop.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Then again, a lot of Americans aren&#8217;t and don&#8217;t.</i><br />
That doesn&#8217;t seem to be a problem to me.</p>
<p>A Congressman suggesting to me that our nation is in peril unless we pray to Jesus has no more authority than Pat Robertson, or my next door neighbor. I believe in, and follow, who I choose.</p>
<p>You have yet to explain what &#8220;troubles&#8221; you, as if somehow that is self &#8211; explanatory. Shedding some light on the political purpose of this meeting would be helpful, too.</p>
<p>I see the insults are beginning to creep in. If you want me to participate in this discussion, you should stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/28/congress-tackles-the-tough-issues/#comment-79946</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6659#comment-79946</guid>
		<description>Frank, the congressmen didn&#039;t simply suggest that people pray. They suggest that people pray to jesus and that only prayer to jesus could save this country. I don&#039;t care if they attend church or tell people to pray for strength and guidance in their own life. What you are deliberately and obstusely ignoring is the overt political purpose of their meeting. This was not a strictly religious event, it was an event entirely designed to blur the boundaries between religion and politics. That&#039;s unsettling, or at least is should be. I guess if you&#039;re christian and happen to agree with the congressmen that jesus is the country&#039;s salvation you wouldn&#039;t have a problem with this. Then again, a lot of Americans aren&#039;t and don&#039;t.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, the congressmen didn&#8217;t simply suggest that people pray. They suggest that people pray to jesus and that only prayer to jesus could save this country. I don&#8217;t care if they attend church or tell people to pray for strength and guidance in their own life. What you are deliberately and obstusely ignoring is the overt political purpose of their meeting. This was not a strictly religious event, it was an event entirely designed to blur the boundaries between religion and politics. That&#8217;s unsettling, or at least is should be. I guess if you&#8217;re christian and happen to agree with the congressmen that jesus is the country&#8217;s salvation you wouldn&#8217;t have a problem with this. Then again, a lot of Americans aren&#8217;t and don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

