Comments on: Rick Santorum, Where He Can’t Hurt Anyone

By: Sue

Sue — Thu, 17 May 2007 08:21:40 +0000

Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. It is always great pleasure to read your posts.

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:05:41 +0000

Farris -

It wasn’t that blue so long ago. Santorum’s poor statesmanship is part of what helped swing it that way.

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:04:38 +0000

That’s true–Santorum will probably just make dishonest right-wing hate-certain-Americans propaganda instead.

By: Dugger

Dugger — Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:27:43 +0000

And I don’t think Democratic millionaire bigwig Michael Moore needs to look out. Santorum probably will not be making dishonest leftwing, hate-America propaganda. Moore’s turf is safe.

By: SaveFarris

SaveFarris — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:53:36 +0000

Tom DeLay was “disgraced”. Santorum merely lost an election in a blue state.

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:00:18 +0000

I, for one, can’t wait. This’ll be good.

By: SpiderJ

SpiderJ — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:04:28 +0000

I agree the words are a bit strong, Jay, but Rick Santorum lost a seat that was previously very safely in his hands. He was once one of the most powerful men in Washington who watched his support dry up as constituents and politicians alike realized what a cock-eyed, backwards-thinking loon he was.

Maybe not “deposed” and “disgraced,” but then you have the find the less inflammatory synonyms to accurately describe his fall.

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:53:20 +0000

A. Grab a dictionary. Santorum was not ‘deposed.’ Dictators are deposed.

B. How was Santorum ‘disgraced’? He lost an election.

Give the hyperbole a rest.