Stand By Your Wife

6:08 pm EST March 22nd, 2007 | Politics | 7 Comments

The difference between Dems and Reps and how they deal with the women in their lives.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

7 Responses to “Stand By Your Wife”

  1. z adura says:
    March 22, 2007 at 6:44 pm

    Oliver, that is a cheap shot. There are many examples of Republicans who have admirable marital relationships. I always kind of admired the Fords for their bond.

    This kind of post is equivalent to Republicans trying to paint all Democrats as philanderers because JFK and Clinton were unfaithful.

  2. fd10801 says:
    March 22, 2007 at 7:34 pm

    Taranto put this together from Andrew Sullivan:

    “Edwards Suspends Campaign” was the title of an Andrew Sullivan post at 12:17 p.m. EDT today:

    He does it because his wife has a recurrence of cancer in some degree to be further explored. It is of a piece with his character to do this; and a simple testament that he has the right priorities and values to be a president of the United States. Sorry, Ms Coulter. But this man will be remembered for a character you do not even want to possess.

    But it turns out Edwards didn’t suspend his campaign, even though his wife’s cancer has recurred. Does this call Edwards’s character into question? Not on your life! Here’s Sullivan at 12:39 p.m.:

    So, despite earlier reports, Edwards will not suspend his campaign. Good for him. . . . What I saw in this press conference was the reality of family values–not the rhetoric, not the divisiveness, not the politics, just the reality of an actual family dealing with real issues. . . .

    The campaign should go on, as life goes on. The cancer should neither help nor hurt it. But I will say this: Elizabeth Edwards is a truly remarkable human being. And her marriage is an inspiration.

    Once you decide a guy can walk on water,it’s easy to believe he can feed 5000 with a basket of loaves and fishes.

  3. Oliver says:
    March 22, 2007 at 7:59 pm

    Andrew Sullivan is a fucking idiot, this a revelation how?

  4. Wilbur says:
    March 22, 2007 at 8:40 pm

    I kinda agree with z_adura. It’s a bit of a stretch to tar every republican with the “family values” of Gingrich, Giuliani, Foley, Livingston, etc. Not much of a stretch, but a stretch.

    It is worth noting the irony, however: John Edwards can’t advocate for the poor if he owns a big house, but Reagan, Gingrich, etc. can pontificate about values and character even if they have left a string of broken marriages and estranged children in their wake.

    Also, Sullivan may be a fucking idiot, but I agree with him on this one. The Edwards’ decision probably depended on a lot of factors that we on the outside are incompetent to judge. They deserve support and applause for whichever path they choose.

    I also like how he rips Coulter a new one. That is an excellent public service.

  5. Rewd says:
    March 23, 2007 at 12:51 pm

    How did Teddy Kennedy “Deal” with the women in his life?

    He killed one, not sure about the others….

  6. fd10801 says:
    March 24, 2007 at 11:18 am

    Is Edwards a bad guy because he won’t set aside his Presidential ambitions to be by his dying wife’s side, or is he a good guy because he won’t set aside his Presidential ambitions to be by his dying wife’s side?

    Discuss.

  7. Mike says:
    March 24, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    Perhaps a better question to ask would be, how did Ethel and Jackie Kennedy and Hillary Clinton deal with the men in their lives?

    Curious, isn’t it, that while the Kennedys are revered (dare I say worshipped?) by Democrats, and Hillary is held aloft as an icon by feminists, all of these women are really classic gold-diggers, lured by wealth and power. Their lives are enriched by the political and social capital acquired by virtue of their marriages, and they patiently endure humiliation and repeatedly eat the “excrement” sandwich handed to them by their husbands, so as not to jeopardize their husband’s (and by proxy, their) careers.

    Not exactly “I am woman, hear me roar” feminism, is it?

    Another interesting contrast is that men like Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton are worshipped by feminists as defenders of the rights of women, even though both men are the worst kind of boorish patriarchs that the radical feminists of the 1970′s vowed repeatedly to disempower.

    And curiously, Newt Gingrich was never held up as a standard -bearer by feminists. Rather, he was portrayed as part of the knuckle-dragging Neanderthal crowd who wanted to keep women at home, barefoot and pregnant. So in that sense, I suppose one could say that Newt was at least consistent with his character, or more accurately, caricature.