Comments on: U.S. Attorney Scandal: Majority Leader Reid Responds to Bush’s Obstruction http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/20/us-attorney-scandal-majority-leader-reid-responds-to-bushs-obstruction/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:45:31 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: S http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/20/us-attorney-scandal-majority-leader-reid-responds-to-bushs-obstruction/#comment-81003 S Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:28:04 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6718#comment-81003 fd10801 | Mar 21, 2007 3:26:45 PM "I hope you're being sarcastic. My comment was tongue - in - cheek." LoL!! DUH! fd10801 | Mar 21, 2007 3:26:45 PM
“I hope you’re being sarcastic. My comment was tongue – in – cheek.”

LoL!! DUH!

]]> By: midderpidge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/20/us-attorney-scandal-majority-leader-reid-responds-to-bushs-obstruction/#comment-81002 midderpidge Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:37:20 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6718#comment-81002 Was that the USA who was expanding her investigation to look at Dick Cheney's involvement, Duros? Was that the USA who was expanding her investigation to look at Dick Cheney’s involvement, Duros?

]]> By: fd10801 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/20/us-attorney-scandal-majority-leader-reid-responds-to-bushs-obstruction/#comment-81001 fd10801 Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:26:45 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6718#comment-81001 <i>This is definitely a matter of critical national importance.</i> I hope you're being sarcastic. My comment was tongue - in - cheek. This is definitely a matter of critical national importance.
I hope you’re being sarcastic.

My comment was tongue – in – cheek.

]]> By: Duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/20/us-attorney-scandal-majority-leader-reid-responds-to-bushs-obstruction/#comment-81000 Duros62 Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:31:46 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6718#comment-81000 Well, then, wouldn't that Dusty Foggo story deserve more attention? Hookergate and all that? As I recall, that had something to do with a US Attorney at the time, one that has since been let go? And they said there'd be pictures! Well, then, wouldn’t that Dusty Foggo story deserve more attention? Hookergate and all that? As I recall, that had something to do with a US Attorney at the time, one that has since been let go?

And they said there’d be pictures!

]]> By: Wellstone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/20/us-attorney-scandal-majority-leader-reid-responds-to-bushs-obstruction/#comment-80999 Wellstone Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:03:29 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6718#comment-80999 Me, too. Good post, Wilbur. This is definitely a matter of critical national importance. Me, too. Good post, Wilbur.

This is definitely a matter of critical national importance.

]]> By: fd10801 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/20/us-attorney-scandal-majority-leader-reid-responds-to-bushs-obstruction/#comment-80998 fd10801 Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:41:21 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6718#comment-80998 I agree with Wilbur. I agree with Wilbur.

]]> By: Wilbur http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/20/us-attorney-scandal-majority-leader-reid-responds-to-bushs-obstruction/#comment-80997 Wilbur Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:58:46 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6718#comment-80997 Administration officials should only be forced to testify under oath when it is a matter of critical national importance, such as eight-year-old sexual harrassment suits or getting blowjobs from interns. Administration officials should only be forced to testify under oath when it is a matter of critical national importance, such as eight-year-old sexual harrassment suits or getting blowjobs from interns.

]]>