U.S. Attorney Scandal: Majority Leader Reid Responds to Bush’s Obstruction
Tweet
Reid goes checkmate.
“After telling a bunch of different stories about why they fired the U.S. Attorneys, the Bush administration is not entitled to the benefit of the doubt. Congress and the American people deserve a straight answer. If Karl Rove plans to tell the truth, he has nothing to fear from being under oath like any other witness.”
Amen.
7 Responses to “U.S. Attorney Scandal: Majority Leader Reid Responds to Bush’s Obstruction”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Administration officials should only be forced to testify under oath when it is a matter of critical national importance, such as eight-year-old sexual harrassment suits or getting blowjobs from interns.
I agree with Wilbur.
Me, too. Good post, Wilbur.
This is definitely a matter of critical national importance.
Well, then, wouldn’t that Dusty Foggo story deserve more attention? Hookergate and all that? As I recall, that had something to do with a US Attorney at the time, one that has since been let go?
And they said there’d be pictures!
This is definitely a matter of critical national importance.
I hope you’re being sarcastic.
My comment was tongue – in – cheek.
Was that the USA who was expanding her investigation to look at Dick Cheney’s involvement, Duros?
fd10801 | Mar 21, 2007 3:26:45 PM
“I hope you’re being sarcastic. My comment was tongue – in – cheek.”
LoL!! DUH!