The con blogs are making something of a show today, trying to distance themselves from Ann Coulter’s remarks. Of course, if you look at the comments that make up their core audience, many of the commenters are dismayed at their “hosts” for being too pc, or being weak willed. In a strange way, its admirable. Ann Coulter speaks for them, and they have the balls to stand with her. Much like the embrace betwen Coulter and Mitt Romney in the video below, the message is clear: Coulter speaks for them, she is one of their heroes, one of their gods.
More proof that Ann really isn’t the sharpest knife in the shed…(see video)
http://minor-ripper.blogspot.com/2006/12/ann-coulter-gets-owned.html
Anyone with half a brain cell (about 10% of the people who read this garbage called Oliver Willis) knows this video was taken PRIOR to her speech.
Tard.
So she never said anything at all controversial prior to the latest crap? Is that what you’re saying? Is it? Is it what you’re saying?
Ian, someone with “half a brain cell” would be more clinically brain-dead than Terri Schiavo, and yet you would be supporting a congressional resolution to keep them alive.
And now you insult the brain-dead? I smell hypocrisy…
Tard.
Ian, no where does Oliver make allusions about when this embrace takes place. Conservatives like her. They embrace her. she says the kind of things they wish they could say.
And stop projecting.
Coulter speaks for them, she is one of their heroes, one of their gods.
Good grief, could you lay it on any thicker?
So is that what you’re you saying, Ian? That Coulter never had a reputation prior to two weeks ago? Is it? Is that what you’re saying? Is it? Well, is it? Is it?
I guess Ian had to go. Michelle’s toenails won’t paint themselves, you know.
‘Tard,’ by the way, is just as offensive as ‘faggot,’ if not more so.