Comments on: To Arms! http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:05:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: JWG http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83040 JWG Mon, 05 Mar 2007 11:36:35 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83040 <blockquote>Goose/gander doesn't incorporate that</blockquote> If you don't think saying it's OK to treat someone the same way you think others were treated is to "treat (something bad or blameworthy) as acceptable" then you are BEYOND stupid. Why am I not surprised?

Goose/gander doesn’t incorporate that

If you don’t think saying it’s OK to treat someone the same way you think others were treated is to “treat (something bad or blameworthy) as acceptable” then you are BEYOND stupid.

Why am I not surprised?

]]> By: Nimrod Gently http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83039 Nimrod Gently Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:11:08 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83039 I know what "condone" means. "To regard or treat (something bad or blameworthy) as acceptable, forgivable, or harmless". Goose/gander doesn't incorporate that. But why am I telling you things you already know? You've got your positon, you're going to stick with it. I know what “condone” means. “To regard or treat (something bad or blameworthy) as acceptable, forgivable, or harmless”. Goose/gander doesn’t incorporate that.

But why am I telling you things you already know? You’ve got your positon, you’re going to stick with it.

]]> By: JWG http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83038 JWG Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:23:11 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83038 <blockquote>"he didn't condone it, he just said...</blockquote> You must not understand what the word "condone" means. You probably shouldn't be throwing the word "stupidity" around until you improve your vocabulary.

“he didn’t condone it, he just said…

You must not understand what the word “condone” means. You probably shouldn’t be throwing the word “stupidity” around until you improve your vocabulary.

]]> By: Nimrod Gently http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83037 Nimrod Gently Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:04:14 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83037 Funny, I was just about to type, "he didn't condone it, he just said what's good for the goose is good for the gander and all that" but it seems the wall of stupidity went up before me. Yes, okay, you are right about everything, reality is exactly as you say it is. Now shut up. Funny, I was just about to type, “he didn’t condone it, he just said what’s good for the goose is good for the gander and all that” but it seems the wall of stupidity went up before me.

Yes, okay, you are right about everything, reality is exactly as you say it is. Now shut up.

]]> By: JWG http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83036 JWG Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:02:33 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83036 OW stated: <blockquote>What's good for the goose is good for the gander.</blockquote> This is an explicit approval. You DID condone it, whether you meant it as such or not. OW stated:

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

This is an explicit approval. You DID condone it, whether you meant it as such or not.

]]> By: Lib4 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83035 Lib4 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:21:58 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83035 OW "I neither condemned nor condoned it" Fair enough....my apologies to the fine gentleman from wingnuttia OW “I neither condemned nor condoned it”

Fair enough….my apologies to the fine gentleman from wingnuttia

]]> By: Duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83034 Duros62 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:03:40 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83034 And yet, Anna Nicole still isn't buried!! Think of the children, for God's sake! And yet, Anna Nicole still isn’t buried!!
Think of the children, for God’s sake!

]]> By: Oliver Willis http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83033 Oliver Willis Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:08:10 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83033 I neither condemned nor condoned it, and ditto for this story. The media's going to dig up this stuff, I was just pointing out how the cons conspiracy theories were refuted by reality. I neither condemned nor condoned it, and ditto for this story. The media’s going to dig up this stuff, I was just pointing out how the cons conspiracy theories were refuted by reality.

]]> By: roundhead http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83032 roundhead Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:00:14 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83032 Al Gore's utilities bill...Hill's college thesis...it's amazing what the dopes in the media will accept as relevant issues from the right wing noise machine. There are so many smoking guns around the lies leading up the the Iraq war that I can't see my hand three inches from my face...but these topics are newsworthy? Sigh. Al Gore’s utilities bill…Hill’s college thesis…it’s amazing what the dopes in the media will accept as relevant issues from the right wing noise machine.

There are so many smoking guns around the lies leading up the the Iraq war that I can’t see my hand three inches from my face…but these topics are newsworthy?

Sigh.

]]> By: JWG http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83031 JWG Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:56:48 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83031 <blockquote>OW condemned the media digging up dirt about Romney</blockquote> No, he didn't. He explicitly condoned it. Read before you call people a jackass.

OW condemned the media digging up dirt about Romney

No, he didn’t. He explicitly condoned it.

Read before you call people a jackass.

]]> By: Lib4 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83030 Lib4 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:44:51 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83030 Digging up a paper a candidate wrote 38 years ago: shameful. Digging up the marital records of a candidate's relative from 110 years ago: justified and above board. Ahh Jackass OW condemned the media digging up dirt about Romney fasmily history in a post last week... <a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/meet_the_romney.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/meet_the_romney.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/meet_the_romney.html</a></a> read before you rip... Digging up a paper a candidate wrote 38 years ago: shameful.

Digging up the marital records of a candidate’s relative from 110 years ago: justified and above board.

Ahh Jackass OW condemned the media digging up dirt about Romney fasmily history in a post last week…

http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/meet_the_romney.html

read before you rip…

]]> By: Duros62 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83029 Duros62 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:20:00 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83029 How about that Al Sharpton-Strom Thurmond connection? That's bizarre. How about that Al Sharpton-Strom Thurmond connection?

That’s bizarre.

]]> By: SaveFarris http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83028 SaveFarris Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:54:19 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83028 In OliverWorld: Digging up a paper a candidate wrote 38 years ago: shameful. Digging up the marital records of a candidate's relative from 110 years ago: justified and above board. In OliverWorld:

Digging up a paper a candidate wrote 38 years ago: shameful.

Digging up the marital records of a candidate’s relative from 110 years ago: justified and above board.

]]> By: JWG http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83027 JWG Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:28:57 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83027 Don't blame OW. He is a product of the IB (International Baccalaureate) program. Don’t blame OW. He is a product of the IB (International Baccalaureate) program.

]]> By: Seth http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83026 Seth Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:18:18 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83026 Check your math. The paper was written in 1969, which makes it 38 years old. Check your math. The paper was written in 1969, which makes it 38 years old.

]]> By: midderpidge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/03/02/to-arms/#comment-83025 midderpidge Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:11:59 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6815#comment-83025 Don't tell Bush, if he reads that book report it will just ruin his enjoyment of the next book on his reading list. Don’t tell Bush, if he reads that book report it will just ruin his enjoyment of the next book on his reading list.

]]>