<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vilsack Out: That Was Quick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/23/vilsack-out-that-was-quick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/23/vilsack-out-that-was-quick/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny05</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/23/vilsack-out-that-was-quick/#comment-83759</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6873#comment-83759</guid>
		<description>Edwards will not drop out when he has nearly a M from ACT Blue for the past 2 months, and we don&#039;t know about the check givers from the past month.  My understanding is that Edwards&#039; fundraising is more competitive than Richardson&#039;s, but certainly Geffen&#039;s 1.3 in one night for Obama isn&#039;t anything to snark at either.

I don&#039;t know how Biden (D-MBNA) is doing, but he has zilch on ACT Blue.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwards will not drop out when he has nearly a M from ACT Blue for the past 2 months, and we don&#8217;t know about the check givers from the past month.  My understanding is that Edwards&#8217; fundraising is more competitive than Richardson&#8217;s, but certainly Geffen&#8217;s 1.3 in one night for Obama isn&#8217;t anything to snark at either.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how Biden (D-MBNA) is doing, but he has zilch on ACT Blue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roundhead</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/23/vilsack-out-that-was-quick/#comment-83758</link>
		<dc:creator>roundhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6873#comment-83758</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a shame.

Not saying I would&#039;ve voted for the guy, I don&#039;t know that much about him. I think his chances ranged somewhere between &quot;slim&quot; and &quot;none&quot; - altho in 1991 I was hoping either Mario Cuomo or Lloyd Bentsen were going to run...but eventually tagged on to this governor from Arkansas and I&#039;d say that turned out alright.

But as far as Vilsack is concerned, I would&#039;ve like to have had the chance to find out what kind of candidate he is, where he stands on the important issues, what his values are, etc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a shame.</p>
<p>Not saying I would&#8217;ve voted for the guy, I don&#8217;t know that much about him. I think his chances ranged somewhere between &#8220;slim&#8221; and &#8220;none&#8221; &#8211; altho in 1991 I was hoping either Mario Cuomo or Lloyd Bentsen were going to run&#8230;but eventually tagged on to this governor from Arkansas and I&#8217;d say that turned out alright.</p>
<p>But as far as Vilsack is concerned, I would&#8217;ve like to have had the chance to find out what kind of candidate he is, where he stands on the important issues, what his values are, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike in dc</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/23/vilsack-out-that-was-quick/#comment-83757</link>
		<dc:creator>mike in dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6873#comment-83757</guid>
		<description>Well, if Vilsack&#039;s out, Biden can&#039;t be too far behind.  And Dodd, too, if his poll numbers don&#039;t come up more.  Gravel really doesn&#039;t have a compelling reason to run, nor does Kucinich(since the entire field is pro-UHC, anti-war, anti-GW).  That&#039;d leave Obama, HRC, Edwards and Richardson.  I kinda think Edwards should drop out if his national numbers don&#039;t start rising, and if his fundraising is far behind the top two.  If this settled into a two way race as early as possible, Hillary loses.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if Vilsack&#8217;s out, Biden can&#8217;t be too far behind.  And Dodd, too, if his poll numbers don&#8217;t come up more.  Gravel really doesn&#8217;t have a compelling reason to run, nor does Kucinich(since the entire field is pro-UHC, anti-war, anti-GW).  That&#8217;d leave Obama, HRC, Edwards and Richardson.  I kinda think Edwards should drop out if his national numbers don&#8217;t start rising, and if his fundraising is far behind the top two.  If this settled into a two way race as early as possible, Hillary loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/23/vilsack-out-that-was-quick/#comment-83756</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6873#comment-83756</guid>
		<description>Man, if he couldn&#039;t work any harder almost 2 years before the election, I guess it&#039;s better that he got out early.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, if he couldn&#8217;t work any harder almost 2 years before the election, I guess it&#8217;s better that he got out early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

