Yeah, but see, that’s what the Iranian militants did to the US embassy. Carter’s actions were in response to that “act of foreign aggression.”

For the record, I think Clinton, Carter, Reagan etc were right (Carter messed up the enactment).

I see. Well then, yes, that’s just exactly like selectively murdering scientists, isn’t it?

Actually at Desert One US troops held a busload of Iranian civilians at gunpoint.

dusty

So what do you call it when troops of one nation move under arms secretly and pre-emptively into (action) the sovereign territory of another? Picnic in force?

dusty

Guess who was commander in chief of those soldiers?

dusty

Anything else, bud?

Poor effin’ Dugger. Somebody help him b4 he shaves his head.

The principal here is that pre-emptive military action, especially pre-emptively assassinating the leaders and scientists of a foreign country, is illegal, immoral and is more likely to cause more problems than it solves.

Assassinating Iranian leaders and scientists today would do more to inflame the very forces of radicalism and nationalism that Reynolds believes they will quell. Much like our botched pre-emptive action in Iraq. We have inflamed the very regional radicalism that the Bush administration said the invasion would delegitimate and sap of strength. In the case of Iraq, pre-emptive war has so far resulted in the EXACT OPPOSITE result than it was supposed to achieve.

Have you thought this out at all Dugger? Of course you haven’t. All you hear is “Let’s kill some people” and that’s all you need to hear.

Did he?

My memory fails me. I thought our people landed way out somewhere. Did they have to take some prisoners or something?

DO YOU GET THAT?

That’s the muthafuckin’ principle.

All I’m saying is that I don’t think you’ve thought this thing out. OW hates Reynolds and tosses out allegations or repeats allegations against him whenever he can. Is it wrong, if they are going to be that harsh (calling him a murderer,etc), to ask why the silence re others killed or attacked by Presidents progressives happen to have liked. Will you all insist your Pres candidate forswear any and all pre-emptibve military actions against any foreign regime.

Or is it really, at heart, just more repackaged Bush hate?

What is the principal???

Were you that stoned during the Iranian Hostage Crisis to suggest that Carter “pre-emptorily invade a sovereign state?”

” Mr. Carter we all know you are an anti-Semite now,…

Carter:antisemitism
Helen Thomas:Stalin

Perspective, Dugger. Get some. And some ice cream while you’re at it

You know, George W. Bush has done many, many things worse than ordering an attack that other people fucked up spectacularly. I don’t want to say hypocrite…wait, yes I do. Hypocrite.

And duros, Carter pre-emptorily invaded a sovereign state and took military action within that state, including holding terrified Iraqi citizens, just minding their own business, at gunpoint - for hours - in the desert. My God man! Have you no heart?! How could Carter do that to those poor innocent people who hadn’t invaded this country or done us any harm.

I demand a war crimes tribunal. Lets make Ramsey Clark the Grand Inquisitor.

” Mr. Carter we all know you are an anti-semite now, but didn’t you once attack with a miltiary force innocent Iranian civilians? Answer yes or no!”

And just what silence are you talking about? You mean the silence on all the blogs in the 70s, 80s and 90s?