<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olbermannia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:08:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84453</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84453</guid>
		<description>So, y&#039;all think it&#039;s unfair when Olbermann names O&#039;Rilly WPITW for defending a child predator on the air?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, y&#8217;all think it&#8217;s unfair when Olbermann names O&#8217;Rilly WPITW for defending a child predator on the air?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84452</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84452</guid>
		<description>I never said otherwise. Foxnews.com gets way higher traffic than MediaMatters.org but it doesn&#039;t prevent us from driving O&#039;Reilly nuts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said otherwise. Foxnews.com gets way higher traffic than MediaMatters.org but it doesn&#8217;t prevent us from driving O&#8217;Reilly nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84451</guid>
		<description>Whatever you say Olly. Whatever helps you sleep at night. But remember, Bill O. kicks Keith&#039;s ass in ratings and that&#039;s all that matters.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you say Olly. Whatever helps you sleep at night. But remember, Bill O. kicks Keith&#8217;s ass in ratings and that&#8217;s all that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84450</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84450</guid>
		<description>Fox overtook CNN in 2002. They had a new product and time to build, ditto now for Olbermann - as you cons like to say, the market will decide but clearly Olbermann drives BillO nuts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox overtook CNN in 2002. They had a new product and time to build, ditto now for Olbermann &#8211; as you cons like to say, the market will decide but clearly Olbermann drives BillO nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84449</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84449</guid>
		<description>Dugger, Olberman&#039;s not clueless, but you certainly are. Unlike you, he loves this country. Unlike O&#039;Reilly, he&#039;s not scum.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dugger, Olberman&#8217;s not clueless, but you certainly are. Unlike you, he loves this country. Unlike O&#8217;Reilly, he&#8217;s not scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84448</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84448</guid>
		<description>Oliver,

I don&#039;t want you to think I am just ignoring what you said. I addressed some of what you said in the new thread. I just don&#039;t want to have two arguments on the same subject in two different threads.

I just want to address your comment about FOX&#039;s ratings. It wasn&#039;t 2002 when FOX &quot;just began&quot; catching up. It was since 1999-2000, I believe. And it wasn&#039;t like Olby gets (1/4 - 1/5 of Bill O). It was like 1/2 or 3/4 for a while.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want you to think I am just ignoring what you said. I addressed some of what you said in the new thread. I just don&#8217;t want to have two arguments on the same subject in two different threads.</p>
<p>I just want to address your comment about FOX&#8217;s ratings. It wasn&#8217;t 2002 when FOX &#8220;just began&#8221; catching up. It was since 1999-2000, I believe. And it wasn&#8217;t like Olby gets (1/4 &#8211; 1/5 of Bill O). It was like 1/2 or 3/4 for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84447</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 02:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84447</guid>
		<description>Hey I like having the choice.  Leftist yahoos can bathe in Olbermanns Nazi salur humor and we can enjoy Fox&#039;s &#039;fair and balanced&#039; programming.

BTW, there are leftists I would watch and listen to.  Herr Olbermann is not one.  Like Nimmer, too morally superior when really clueless.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I like having the choice.  Leftist yahoos can bathe in Olbermanns Nazi salur humor and we can enjoy Fox&#8217;s &#8216;fair and balanced&#8217; programming.</p>
<p>BTW, there are leftists I would watch and listen to.  Herr Olbermann is not one.  Like Nimmer, too morally superior when really clueless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84446</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84446</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t work. Arse.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t work. Arse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84445</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84445</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I really don&#039;t think O&#039;Reilly cares. Why? Because he ignores him.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

bahahahahahaha haha haaaahahahaaa


Only posting this to try and fix the tags but still, BWAAAAHAHAHA
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I really don&#8217;t think O&#8217;Reilly cares. Why? Because he ignores him.</p></blockquote>
<p>bahahahahahaha haha haaaahahahaaa</p>
<p>Only posting this to try and fix the tags but still, BWAAAAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84444</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84444</guid>
		<description>The only show on Fox that was close to CNN pre-2002 was O&#039;Reilly vs. King. I&#039;ve got no dog in that hunt, CNN got dumb and lazy and deserved to lose to Fox who political content aside presented news in a new, dynamic style. Fox has an exclusively pro-conservative bias to their content, they even identify themselves as such nowadays as they&#039;ve seen their numbers - still very high for cable news - begin to erode.

I&#039;ve been saying a long time that MSNBC should appeal to those turned off by Fox&#039;s pro-Republican spinning. It doesn&#039;t mean they have to be liberal, but just express the kind of skepticism of GOP politics you wouldn&#039;t ever see on Fox, and they&#039;re doing that with folks like Joe Scarborough.

I&#039;m not exactly sure what &quot;ties&quot; you&#039;re claiming about blogs and Olbermann other than they both get ideas from each other, like how you guys feed stuff to Fox via HotAir (with you guys, what&#039;s good for the goose is always &quot;unfair&quot; for the gander).

The whole reason Olbermann talks about NBC (they&#039;re the NBC in MSNBC in case you haven&#039;t noticed) is because Olbermann started punching at him. As part of an organization that &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/issues_topics/people/billoreilly&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;has fact-checked O&#039;Reilly&lt;/a&gt; a few bajillion times it doesn&#039;t take a juggernaut to get him &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200412100002&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;riled and raving&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only show on Fox that was close to CNN pre-2002 was O&#8217;Reilly vs. King. I&#8217;ve got no dog in that hunt, CNN got dumb and lazy and deserved to lose to Fox who political content aside presented news in a new, dynamic style. Fox has an exclusively pro-conservative bias to their content, they even identify themselves as such nowadays as they&#8217;ve seen their numbers &#8211; still very high for cable news &#8211; begin to erode.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying a long time that MSNBC should appeal to those turned off by Fox&#8217;s pro-Republican spinning. It doesn&#8217;t mean they have to be liberal, but just express the kind of skepticism of GOP politics you wouldn&#8217;t ever see on Fox, and they&#8217;re doing that with folks like Joe Scarborough.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not exactly sure what &#8220;ties&#8221; you&#8217;re claiming about blogs and Olbermann other than they both get ideas from each other, like how you guys feed stuff to Fox via HotAir (with you guys, what&#8217;s good for the goose is always &#8220;unfair&#8221; for the gander).</p>
<p>The whole reason Olbermann talks about NBC (they&#8217;re the NBC in MSNBC in case you haven&#8217;t noticed) is because Olbermann started punching at him. As part of an organization that <a href="http://mediamatters.org/issues_topics/people/billoreilly" rel="nofollow">has fact-checked O&#8217;Reilly</a> a few bajillion times it doesn&#8217;t take a juggernaut to get him <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200412100002" rel="nofollow">riled and raving</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vwcat</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84443</link>
		<dc:creator>vwcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84443</guid>
		<description>Very smart decision.  MSNBC knows who brings those ratings in.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very smart decision.  MSNBC knows who brings those ratings in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84442</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84442</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;CNN did not lose to Fox until 2002 (long after FNC and MSNBC had launched and had national carriage). Fox appeals to the hard right (most of the people watching them believe WMDs were found in Iraq) while independents and Dems are split between MSNBC and CNN.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Correction: You mean FOX started to whoop CNN in 2002. They were strong competitors  LONG before then. Oliver, please don&#039;t say FOX is for hard right-wingers and then say MSNBC is for &quot;independents&quot; and &quot;Dems&quot;. If you&#039;re going to use such rhetoric for Fox, at least admit MSNBC appeals to liberals. I&#039;m not saying anything wrong is with that, it&#039;s good for business to get that niche. But, just admit it.

&lt;blockquote&gt;And you slamming them when you&#039;ve built your profile in blogging (Political Teen, HotAir) by excerpting video clips just like C+L and the others you cite is just kinda funny.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What are you talking about? Your comparing apples to oranges.  What does me posting video have to do with C&amp;L and other blogs having ties with Olbermann? And you know this is true. We have a common friend who knows this.

&lt;blockquote&gt;As August mentioned, he ignores MSNBC so much he talks about them every day and night.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And? We&#039;re not talking about MSNBC (actually he talks about NBC), we&#039;re talking about Olby.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>CNN did not lose to Fox until 2002 (long after FNC and MSNBC had launched and had national carriage). Fox appeals to the hard right (most of the people watching them believe WMDs were found in Iraq) while independents and Dems are split between MSNBC and CNN.</p></blockquote>
<p>Correction: You mean FOX started to whoop CNN in 2002. They were strong competitors  LONG before then. Oliver, please don&#8217;t say FOX is for hard right-wingers and then say MSNBC is for &#8220;independents&#8221; and &#8220;Dems&#8221;. If you&#8217;re going to use such rhetoric for Fox, at least admit MSNBC appeals to liberals. I&#8217;m not saying anything wrong is with that, it&#8217;s good for business to get that niche. But, just admit it.</p>
<blockquote><p>And you slamming them when you&#8217;ve built your profile in blogging (Political Teen, HotAir) by excerpting video clips just like C+L and the others you cite is just kinda funny.</p></blockquote>
<p>What are you talking about? Your comparing apples to oranges.  What does me posting video have to do with C&#038;L and other blogs having ties with Olbermann? And you know this is true. We have a common friend who knows this.</p>
<blockquote><p>As August mentioned, he ignores MSNBC so much he talks about them every day and night.</p></blockquote>
<p>And? We&#8217;re not talking about MSNBC (actually he talks about NBC), we&#8217;re talking about Olby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84441</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84441</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;I really don&#039;t think O&#039;Reilly cares... Ian &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That&#039;s a hilarious analysis: Fox is all conservative all the time, MSNBC is mainly conservative with Tucker Carlson, Chris Matthews  and Joe Scarborough, CNN is largely conservative with their reporters and Headline News racist Glenn Beck. You can check on &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Media Matters&lt;/a&gt; and search each network for a fine factual  analysis of their reporting.
O&#039;Reilly still maintains his lead, but Olbermann has beat him in the one demographic a time or two. Olbermann is beating all other MSNBC shows and CNN. O&#039;Reilly has tried to make a petition to force MSNBC to remove Olbermann so he cares, baby, Der Pompous Ass  cares.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>I really don&#8217;t think O&#8217;Reilly cares&#8230; Ian </i></p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a hilarious analysis: Fox is all conservative all the time, MSNBC is mainly conservative with Tucker Carlson, Chris Matthews  and Joe Scarborough, CNN is largely conservative with their reporters and Headline News racist Glenn Beck. You can check on <a href="http://mediamatters.org/" rel="nofollow">Media Matters</a> and search each network for a fine factual  analysis of their reporting.<br />
O&#8217;Reilly still maintains his lead, but Olbermann has beat him in the one demographic a time or two. Olbermann is beating all other MSNBC shows and CNN. O&#8217;Reilly has tried to make a petition to force MSNBC to remove Olbermann so he cares, baby, Der Pompous Ass  cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84440</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84440</guid>
		<description>O&#039;rilly only ignores him when they are in the same room. Avoiding eye contact, staying a safe distance, that sort of thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;rilly only ignores him when they are in the same room. Avoiding eye contact, staying a safe distance, that sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84439</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84439</guid>
		<description>CNN did not lose to Fox until 2002 (long after FNC and MSNBC had launched and had national carriage). Fox appeals to the hard right (most of the people watching them believe WMDs were found in Iraq) while independents and Dems are split between MSNBC and CNN.

And you slamming them when you&#039;ve built your profile in blogging (Political Teen, HotAir) by excerpting video clips just like C+L and the others you cite is just kinda funny.

As August mentioned, he ignores MSNBC so much he talks about them every day and night.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN did not lose to Fox until 2002 (long after FNC and MSNBC had launched and had national carriage). Fox appeals to the hard right (most of the people watching them believe WMDs were found in Iraq) while independents and Dems are split between MSNBC and CNN.</p>
<p>And you slamming them when you&#8217;ve built your profile in blogging (Political Teen, HotAir) by excerpting video clips just like C+L and the others you cite is just kinda funny.</p>
<p>As August mentioned, he ignores MSNBC so much he talks about them every day and night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: August J. Pollak</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84438</link>
		<dc:creator>August J. Pollak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84438</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I really don&#039;t think O&#039;Reilly cares. Why? Because he ignores him.&lt;/i&gt;

Yep, he sure tends to ignore Olbermann very loudly and often.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I really don&#8217;t think O&#8217;Reilly cares. Why? Because he ignores him.</i></p>
<p>Yep, he sure tends to ignore Olbermann very loudly and often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84437</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84437</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jay but for different reasons. If they dropped Olbermann, they would receive massive backlash from MM , TVnewser, C&amp;L and other Olby propaganda outlets. I really don&#039;t think O&#039;Reilly cares. Why? Because he ignores him.


***

Oliver,

That was a different time, different place. CNN was the ONLY cable news network at the time. Then two more emerged. All three have a hold on their markets. CNN is for moderate-liberal Dems, MSNBC is for liberals, and FOX is for moderate-conservatives.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jay but for different reasons. If they dropped Olbermann, they would receive massive backlash from MM , TVnewser, C&#038;L and other Olby propaganda outlets. I really don&#8217;t think O&#8217;Reilly cares. Why? Because he ignores him.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>That was a different time, different place. CNN was the ONLY cable news network at the time. Then two more emerged. All three have a hold on their markets. CNN is for moderate-liberal Dems, MSNBC is for liberals, and FOX is for moderate-conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84436</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84436</guid>
		<description>CNN was king of the hill for a long time, Fox came along and did something different and is now the current king. MSNBC tried too long to just ape the leaders, they&#039;re now doing something different and gaining viewers - not at Fox levels yet, but then Fox wasn&#039;t at Fox levels a few years ago either.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN was king of the hill for a long time, Fox came along and did something different and is now the current king. MSNBC tried too long to just ape the leaders, they&#8217;re now doing something different and gaining viewers &#8211; not at Fox levels yet, but then Fox wasn&#8217;t at Fox levels a few years ago either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rheinhard</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84435</link>
		<dc:creator>Rheinhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84435</guid>
		<description>For some reason, this &quot;BillO is still teh King!&quot; type rhetoric reminds me a lot of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/apple_passes_dell_in_market_value/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;following exchange&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;i&gt;On October 6, 1997, in response to the question of what he&#039;d do if he was in charge of Apple Computer, Dell founder and then CEO Michael Dell stood before a crowd of several thousand IT executives and answered flippantly, &quot;&lt;b&gt;What would I do? I&#039;d shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders.&lt;/b&gt;&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Apple has now surpassed Dell in market value, and has seen its position &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_08/b4022074.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;slip&lt;/a&gt; because of succumbing &quot;to complacency in the belief that its business model would always keep it far ahead of the pack.&quot;

So yes, Fox News, keep running with the same tired &quot;liberals are the enemy&quot; routine as if Rush Limbaugh was fresh and new, no need to change anything (hell, give the man his own &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/14/dreadful-comedy-fair-and-balanced/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comedy show&lt;/a&gt;, I&#039;m sure no one will notice the canned laughter!)  Keep beating that old &quot;Evil Dems will eat your babies!&quot; drum, and people will continue to watch your drivel for ever and ever and ever.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, this &#8220;BillO is still teh King!&#8221; type rhetoric reminds me a lot of the <a href="http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/apple_passes_dell_in_market_value/" rel="nofollow">following exchange</a>:</p>
<p><i>On October 6, 1997, in response to the question of what he&#8217;d do if he was in charge of Apple Computer, Dell founder and then CEO Michael Dell stood before a crowd of several thousand IT executives and answered flippantly, &#8220;<b>What would I do? I&#8217;d shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders.</b>&#8220;</i></p>
<p>Apple has now surpassed Dell in market value, and has seen its position <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_08/b4022074.htm" rel="nofollow">slip</a> because of succumbing &#8220;to complacency in the belief that its business model would always keep it far ahead of the pack.&#8221;</p>
<p>So yes, Fox News, keep running with the same tired &#8220;liberals are the enemy&#8221; routine as if Rush Limbaugh was fresh and new, no need to change anything (hell, give the man his own <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/14/dreadful-comedy-fair-and-balanced/" rel="nofollow">comedy show</a>, I&#8217;m sure no one will notice the canned laughter!)  Keep beating that old &#8220;Evil Dems will eat your babies!&#8221; drum, and people will continue to watch your drivel for ever and ever and ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/15/olbermannia/#comment-84434</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6934#comment-84434</guid>
		<description>Mmm...delicious grapes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm&#8230;delicious grapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
