<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Fumbling Big Time On Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/09/democrats-fumbling-big-time-on-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/09/democrats-fumbling-big-time-on-iraq/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tdraicer</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/09/democrats-fumbling-big-time-on-iraq/#comment-85137</link>
		<dc:creator>tdraicer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6971#comment-85137</guid>
		<description>Anyone who thinks that a Dem Senate that depends on Lieberman for its bare majority can end this war is kidding themselves. That the war will continue until Bush leaves office was decided when Kerry lost. The Dem job is to stick the GOP with the bill, so we don't get someone like Rudy in the White House in 2009.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who thinks that a Dem Senate that depends on Lieberman for its bare majority can end this war is kidding themselves. That the war will continue until Bush leaves office was decided when Kerry lost. The Dem job is to stick the GOP with the bill, so we don&#8217;t get someone like Rudy in the White House in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2007/02/09/democrats-fumbling-big-time-on-iraq/#comment-85136</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=6971#comment-85136</guid>
		<description>To be fair, the number of oversight committee sessions and, not the least of which, putting Bremer and rice on the hot seat, is encouraging and more balls-y than we've seen in quite some time.
Non-binding resolution? feh.
though I agree that all this hand-wringing back and forth is not productive.
A vote to debate whether to debate the non-binding resolution? Come on. People, get on with it already
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, the number of oversight committee sessions and, not the least of which, putting Bremer and rice on the hot seat, is encouraging and more balls-y than we&#8217;ve seen in quite some time.<br />
Non-binding resolution? feh.<br />
though I agree that all this hand-wringing back and forth is not productive.<br />
A vote to debate whether to debate the non-binding resolution? Come on. People, get on with it already</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
