Superbowl Predictions

6:54 pm EST February 2nd, 2007 | News | 20 Comments

I still say Bears win.

Bears 35
Colts 27

What say ye?

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

20 Responses to “Superbowl Predictions”

  1. RedBastardGod says:
    February 2, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    OW, are you giving points then?

    Colts 38
    Bears 17

    Although I’d much prefer something like:

    Colts 2
    Bears 0

    Now, That would be funny!

  2. chum says:
    February 2, 2007 at 7:35 pm

    Prince = 1
    FCC = 0

    Commercials and BS = 3 hours
    Actual Football = 1 hour

    Colts’ Win = 1
    Bears Loss = Priceless

  3. C.S.Strowbridge says:
    February 2, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    Doesn’t matter who wins, they’d still lose to the B.C. Lions!

    CFL = 1
    NFL = 0

  4. Nimrod Gently says:
    February 2, 2007 at 8:11 pm

    I don’t know how your little armoured rugby thing is scored, but I’m leaning toward the Colts for this one, because I’m a fan of MST3K and that kind of makes me a Packers fan by association.

    Based on my limited knowledge of the game, and the fact that I always end up supporting the loser (I was cheering Seattle last time), the Bears’ll probably win though.

    (by the way, to people like Frank who just naturally mistrust a foreigner, there are only two things I have against Gridiron: your inexplicable insistence on calling it “Football” and the fact that it keeps stopping like every two minutes for an advert. Anything endorsed by Martin Johnson is good enough for me)

  5. mambochicken23 says:
    February 2, 2007 at 8:15 pm

    Bears 21, Colts 10. Peyton is going to get manhandled by the Bears’ D. Look for Urlacher to be in every Bears defensive play.

  6. biggerbox says:
    February 2, 2007 at 10:53 pm

    Oh, is there a game this weekend? ;-)

  7. Thom says:
    February 3, 2007 at 12:24 am

    Ye? How about Me?

    Obliteration! Devestation! And extreeeeme humiliation!

    Colts 31

    Bears 9

    Record this, Oliver. I’m looking for a job in numbers.

  8. Thom says:
    February 3, 2007 at 12:25 am

    Oh galdarnit, I spelled “devastation” wrong.

  9. mdhåtter says:
    February 3, 2007 at 5:44 am

    Budweiser = 0
    Bud Light = 0

  10. muzza says:
    February 3, 2007 at 10:04 am

    The Bears win only if the game is played in a snowstorm.

    Colts 30

    Bears 10

  11. Jeremy says:
    February 3, 2007 at 10:09 am

    Bears: 34
    Colts: 30

    Also, it’s worth noting that Condoleezza Rice is backing the Colts:
    http://obamarama.org/2007/02/03/one-more-reason-to-root-for-the-bears-on-sunday.aspx

  12. Muzza says:
    February 3, 2007 at 11:06 am

    “Also, it’s worth noting that Condoleezza Rice is backing the Colts”

    Sure, that may be a reason to root for the Bears, but sure ain’t a reason to bet on them. If there’s one thing that Condi may actually know something about it’s football.

  13. ed says:
    February 3, 2007 at 2:08 pm

    ESPN’s The Sports Guy says he hasn’t heard anyone pick the Bears. In all of the extensive pre-bigassgame analysis, I haven’t heard anyone yet yammer about the key common denominator of winning Super Bowl clubs: Who parties harder. From the great Max McGee to Joe Willie to Stabler’s Raiders (did they have a babe-filled hot tub on the sidelines?) to Jim McMahon triumphantly leading an insanely large entourage in the wee hours down Bourbon Street and then mooning the helicopter chasing from above. A couple few years ago Jim Fossil clamped down on his Giants with strict rules and bed checks and whatnot then got crushed by Tony Siragussa and Co,. who may as well have been playing in Hawaiian shirts (and we already knew a little too well that Ray Lewis knows how to party at a Super Bowl). Sure, there’s the occasional Eugene Robinson to buck the trend, but that’s how’s you bet. Given that Brian Urlacher dated Paris Hilton pre-sex tape and Peyton Manning will prob’ly hit the sack at a sensible hour after pouring over playbooks and game film and downing a glass of warm (skim) milk, well, that points to a Bears victory.

  14. Duros62 says:
    February 3, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    Hey, I thought betting on football was illegal?

  15. Retired Catholic says:
    February 3, 2007 at 4:12 pm

    Bears 24, Colts 17

  16. Wilbur says:
    February 3, 2007 at 6:25 pm

    Where did all these high numbers come from? Both qb’s will choke, producing the second straight Superbowl in which the outcome will be decided by which team f*cks up worse.

    Final score…
    Chicago: 0
    Indy: 0

    I know that’s impossible, but I bet my prediction is closer than anyone else’s so far.

  17. buma says:
    February 4, 2007 at 8:56 am

    Colts 31, Bears 16, although I’d prefer that Manning lose.

  18. Quaker in a Basement says:
    February 4, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    New Zealand over England by three wickets.

  19. anonymous says:
    February 4, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    I still say Bears win.

    Bears 35
    Colts 27

    What say ye?

    I think that those scores are too high for a Bears win. Either the Colts blow out the Bears in a high-scoring game, or the Bears win in a lower-scoring one (my personal hope).

    Rooting for the Bears, expecting the Colts to win. But for the record:

    Bears 24
    Colts 17

    And if I’m correct, everyone who’s ever commented with the name “anonymous” on your site will have bragging rights.

  20. anonymous says:
    February 4, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    Crap, Retired Catholic beat me to it! Okay, Retired Catholic, you have to change your prediction to give me sole bragging rights.