Head From Rear Extraction: STAT!

7:59 pm EST January 17th, 2007 | News | 7 Comments

One wonders how a tool like Andrew Sullivan can write an entry like this lamenting about the loss of life in Iraq when Sullivan was among the war’s biggest cheerleaders, licking Bush’s boots and calling all dissenters traitors.

The only explanation is that his head must be up his ass.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

7 Responses to “Head From Rear Extraction: STAT!”

  1. Plutonious Monk says:
    January 17, 2007 at 10:05 pm

    Sullivan changed his mind about support for the war and for Bush a couple of years ago. I respect his change of perspective. Also, he vigorously opposes the Bush and DOJ torture policies.
    Let’s not copy the mouth breathing conservatives who begin Swift Boating one of their own the minute they start seeing the light.

  2. Plutonious Monk says:
    January 17, 2007 at 10:05 pm

    Sullivan changed his mind about support for the war and for Bush a couple of years ago. I respect his change of perspective. Also, he vigorously opposes the Bush and DOJ torture policies.
    Let’s not copy the mouth breathing conservatives who begin Swift Boating one of their own the minute they start seeing the light.

  3. Oliver Willis says:
    January 17, 2007 at 11:44 pm

    Sullivan isn’t one of our own, he’s a jackass who cheerleaded the hell out of a war and switched sides for political advantage and nothing more. He hasn’t seen the light.

  4. apikoros says:
    January 18, 2007 at 12:40 am

    The term you are looking for, Mr. Willis, is “cranio-rectal inversion.” Mr. Sullivan has nearly achieved Klein bottle status, as his head is so far up his ass that it has nearly linked with his mouth.

  5. Organic George says:
    January 18, 2007 at 11:06 am

    Not one of our own?

    Oliver you sound like a Bushite.

    If AS did not agree with us from the get go, then AS has no right to his new position which agrees with us.

    Talk about your twisted logic

  6. Nimrod Gently says:
    January 18, 2007 at 12:53 pm

    That’s not what he meant. What he meant was he’s a dick.

  7. stmojo says:
    January 18, 2007 at 10:37 pm

    It seems like just the other day that Sullivan was accusing those who opposed Bush’s war of being traitors and fifth-columnists. If he has apologised for that, I must have missed it.
    If he was the decent, moral person he portrays himself to be, he would make a serious effort to make amends for that. Instead, his thoughtful-pundit status seems enhanced as he whines about how Bush screwed everything up.