<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vurw bzxjt</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53620</link>
		<dc:creator>vurw bzxjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53620</guid>
		<description>olbzckx rvom idaoe brle qrzki tnzfc mekcxbliq &lt;a href="http://www.cjge.dmzckinpo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cjge.dmzckinpo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cjge.dmzckinpo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>olbzckx rvom idaoe brle qrzki tnzfc mekcxbliq <a href="http://www.cjge.dmzckinpo.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.cjge.dmzckinpo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cjge.dmzckinpo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtdb smzbpk</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53619</link>
		<dc:creator>xtdb smzbpk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53619</guid>
		<description>ptgezu ldhym fbqrmnkgu wuqko esmtaqxw rqsjt boqi
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ptgezu ldhym fbqrmnkgu wuqko esmtaqxw rqsjt boqi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trulib</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53618</link>
		<dc:creator>Trulib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53618</guid>
		<description>Let us not forget that Ford gave Indonesia the OK to invade East Timor and slaughter over 200,000 of their population.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us not forget that Ford gave Indonesia the OK to invade East Timor and slaughter over 200,000 of their population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoduck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53617</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53617</guid>
		<description>Something else that Ford should be remembered for, with approbation, is his explicit greenlighting of the Indonesian  invasion of East Timor.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else that Ford should be remembered for, with approbation, is his explicit greenlighting of the Indonesian  invasion of East Timor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory_Is_Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53616</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory_Is_Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53616</guid>
		<description>Oliver, try not to get your panties in a wad.  Yeah, Nixon indeed won a landslide in '72 and received a strong mandate. Think of the reasons for this landslide. Then recall how  Nixon's associated actions during and after this landslide re-election  served to mock and defraud millions who supported him. Even though I was too young to vote, I was one of them.  Over time, the mandate to govern transformed into a mandate to resign.  How ironic it was, to witness such a spectacular and deserved fall.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver, try not to get your panties in a wad.  Yeah, Nixon indeed won a landslide in &#8216;72 and received a strong mandate. Think of the reasons for this landslide. Then recall how  Nixon&#8217;s associated actions during and after this landslide re-election  served to mock and defraud millions who supported him. Even though I was too young to vote, I was one of them.  Over time, the mandate to govern transformed into a mandate to resign.  How ironic it was, to witness such a spectacular and deserved fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53615</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53615</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Dugger you idiot, Nixon was re-elected in a landslide then had to freaking resign because he was going to be removed from office for high crimes. Did you sleep through all of history?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Dugger you idiot, Nixon was re-elected in a landslide then had to freaking resign because he was going to be removed from office for high crimes. Did you sleep through all of history?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St Wendeler</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53614</link>
		<dc:creator>St Wendeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53614</guid>
		<description>Oliver - You do forget Ford's Helsinki Accords with the USSR, which was the first chink in the armor of the Russkies as it demonstrated that they couldn't allow dissent within their own country.

From the wikipedia entry:

&lt;i&gt;Helsinki's effects inside the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, however, were equally unexpected, and far more significant. [...] it gradually became a manifesto of the dissident and liberal movement'... What this meant was that the people who lived under these systems - at least the more courageous - could claim official permission to say what they thought."&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver - You do forget Ford&#8217;s Helsinki Accords with the USSR, which was the first chink in the armor of the Russkies as it demonstrated that they couldn&#8217;t allow dissent within their own country.</p>
<p>From the wikipedia entry:</p>
<p><i>Helsinki&#8217;s effects inside the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, however, were equally unexpected, and far more significant. [...] it gradually became a manifesto of the dissident and liberal movement&#8217;&#8230; What this meant was that the people who lived under these systems - at least the more courageous - could claim official permission to say what they thought.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53613</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53613</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Only the most diehard of the far right wanted Nixon to remain in office.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don't disagree with this. Heck, I remember it. What does this have to do with whether or not people wanted him prosecuted or pardoned (your main argument)? Once he was out of office most people were satisfied.
&lt;blockquote&gt;52% is still a majority&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Actually, 50.1% is still a majority, which is what Carter got (one of the few Democrats to get over 50% of the vote in the last century-- along with FDR and LBJ).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Only the most diehard of the far right wanted Nixon to remain in office.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with this. Heck, I remember it. What does this have to do with whether or not people wanted him prosecuted or pardoned (your main argument)? Once he was out of office most people were satisfied.</p>
<blockquote><p>52% is still a majority</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, 50.1% is still a majority, which is what Carter got (one of the few Democrats to get over 50% of the vote in the last century&#8211; along with FDR and LBJ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53612</link>
		<dc:creator>Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53612</guid>
		<description>Ford was bad president, but Carter was clearly the worst president of modern times - maybe ever. The numbers don't lie.  More Americans suffered and lost under Carter than any other presdient.  And now he's turned into a pious near anti-semite.  Isn't that nice.

We poo poo Nixon but he was relected in a landslide.  Carter,a first term incumbent, was defeated in a landslide.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford was bad president, but Carter was clearly the worst president of modern times - maybe ever. The numbers don&#8217;t lie.  More Americans suffered and lost under Carter than any other presdient.  And now he&#8217;s turned into a pious near anti-semite.  Isn&#8217;t that nice.</p>
<p>We poo poo Nixon but he was relected in a landslide.  Carter,a first term incumbent, was defeated in a landslide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53611</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53611</guid>
		<description>Please, please, please read some history. There's a reason George HW Bush, then the head of the RNC made the unprecedented step of getting Nixon to resign. By comparison, George W. Bush is a very popular president. Only the most diehard of the far right wanted Nixon to remain in office. There's a reason why while other presidents numbers may have bounced back post-presidency - notably Carter and Truman, Richard Nixon has lived on to be reviled by a whole new generation.

You're not going to get me arguing that Carter's presidency was a good, much less great, one. But he got an electoral drubbing, much preferable to being shamed into resigning from office - a feat only Richard Nixon has been forced to do in our entire history.

Gerald Ford did not excel at the presidency. He kept the seat warm, barely. He was the 20th century version of the 19th century inconsequential presidents.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, please, please read some history. There&#8217;s a reason George HW Bush, then the head of the RNC made the unprecedented step of getting Nixon to resign. By comparison, George W. Bush is a very popular president. Only the most diehard of the far right wanted Nixon to remain in office. There&#8217;s a reason why while other presidents numbers may have bounced back post-presidency - notably Carter and Truman, Richard Nixon has lived on to be reviled by a whole new generation.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not going to get me arguing that Carter&#8217;s presidency was a good, much less great, one. But he got an electoral drubbing, much preferable to being shamed into resigning from office - a feat only Richard Nixon has been forced to do in our entire history.</p>
<p>Gerald Ford did not excel at the presidency. He kept the seat warm, barely. He was the 20th century version of the 19th century inconsequential presidents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53610</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53610</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Then why would 48% of the country vote to keep Ford in office even though he kept Nixon "on the streets"?&lt;/i&gt;

A. 52% is still a majority.
B. Ford did other stuff that outweighed some people's desire to put Nixon in the slammer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Then why would 48% of the country vote to keep Ford in office even though he kept Nixon &#8220;on the streets&#8221;?</i></p>
<p>A. 52% is still a majority.<br />
B. Ford did other stuff that outweighed some people&#8217;s desire to put Nixon in the slammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory_Is_Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53609</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory_Is_Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53609</guid>
		<description>If Jerry Ford excelled as a president, it was largely because he was the right man to serve in those dark days.  The pardon was (and still is) controversial but it rightfully turned the nation back to a state of normalcy.  Ford lifted us up from the swamp of vindictiveness and obsession.  For that, I salute him.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Jerry Ford excelled as a president, it was largely because he was the right man to serve in those dark days.  The pardon was (and still is) controversial but it rightfully turned the nation back to a state of normalcy.  Ford lifted us up from the swamp of vindictiveness and obsession.  For that, I salute him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53608</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53608</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The streets&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Then why would 48% of the country vote to keep Ford in office even though he kept Nixon "on the streets"? Are we back to OW's "most diehard diehard conservatives" again?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The streets</p></blockquote>
<p>Then why would 48% of the country vote to keep Ford in office even though he kept Nixon &#8220;on the streets&#8221;? Are we back to OW&#8217;s &#8220;most diehard diehard conservatives&#8221; again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zython</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53607</link>
		<dc:creator>Zython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53607</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If he was talking about Nixon, then Nixon was already out of office (since the thread is about Ford). What did most of the country want Nixon "out" of once Ford was in office?&lt;/i&gt;

The streets.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If he was talking about Nixon, then Nixon was already out of office (since the thread is about Ford). What did most of the country want Nixon &#8220;out&#8221; of once Ford was in office?</i></p>
<p>The streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53606</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53606</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;…Carter…four years of a disastrous Presidency.  Jay&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The endless Republican smearing of Carter continues despite the fact that Carter &lt;a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/jimmy_carter/profile.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;was a better president&lt;/a&gt; that Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush Bush.
Of course, when it comes to post-Presidential careers, Carter has been the best in the 20th and 21st centuries. Ford golfed; Reagan took a couple of mil from the Japanese and disappeared into his mental fog; Bush I went for the big bucks.
That smearing continues into Carter's current book for daring to call the Israeli abuse of the Occupied Territories &lt;a href="http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article6310.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;for what it is&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>…Carter…four years of a disastrous Presidency.  Jay</i></p></blockquote>
<p>The endless Republican smearing of Carter continues despite the fact that Carter <a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/jimmy_carter/profile.html" rel="nofollow">was a better president</a> that Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Bush Bush.<br />
Of course, when it comes to post-Presidential careers, Carter has been the best in the 20th and 21st centuries. Ford golfed; Reagan took a couple of mil from the Japanese and disappeared into his mental fog; Bush I went for the big bucks.<br />
That smearing continues into Carter&#8217;s current book for daring to call the Israeli abuse of the Occupied Territories <a href="http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article6310.shtml" rel="nofollow">for what it is</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53605</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53605</guid>
		<description>Ford pardoned the worst president in history? No. The worst president in history beat Ford in the '76 election.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford pardoned the worst president in history? No. The worst president in history beat Ford in the &#8216;76 election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53604</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53604</guid>
		<description>Let me explain another way: Ford pardoned Nixon one month after Nixon resigned. Whether or not there was a pardon or a prosecution, Nixon was out of office. What does wanting Nixon "out" have to do with a pardon/prosecution?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me explain another way: Ford pardoned Nixon one month after Nixon resigned. Whether or not there was a pardon or a prosecution, Nixon was out of office. What does wanting Nixon &#8220;out&#8221; have to do with a pardon/prosecution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53603</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53603</guid>
		<description>If he was talking about Nixon, then Nixon was already out of office (since the thread is about Ford). What did most of the country want Nixon "out" of once Ford was in office?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he was talking about Nixon, then Nixon was already out of office (since the thread is about Ford). What did most of the country want Nixon &#8220;out&#8221; of once Ford was in office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimrod Gently</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53602</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimrod Gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53602</guid>
		<description>Oliver was talking about Nixon, moron.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver was talking about Nixon, moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/12/28/ford/#comment-53601</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3370#comment-53601</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Frankly at the time, most of America wanted him out, except for the most diehard diehard of Republican conservatives.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Carter won 50.1% to 48%. Are you trying to tell us that 48% of the country was made up of "the most diehard diehard conservatives"? Are you just making sh** up?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Frankly at the time, most of America wanted him out, except for the most diehard diehard of Republican conservatives.</p></blockquote>
<p>Carter won 50.1% to 48%. Are you trying to tell us that 48% of the country was made up of &#8220;the most diehard diehard conservatives&#8221;? Are you just making sh** up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
