All four used hate speech mind you; disguised as appropriate language. And I recommend “The Dawkins Delusion” a great book that aids in helping us realize what a nut he is.

Personally while living in Canada my philosophy has become let me believe what I want to believe and I’ll let you believe what you want to believe.

People have a tendency of attaching themselves to an ideology and then go crazy over it. For instance when maoism, a moralist philosophy, originally began as a good idea but later became a genocidal atheist militancy. That’s the way human history has always been.

My new credo is simple. Fuck atheism, fuck religion, fuck ideological supremicism

Some free videos:
http://fghh.info/img/27.jpg http://fghh.info/img/115.jpg
http://fghh.info/img/9.jpg http://fghh.info/img/117.jpg
http://fghh.info/img/100.jpg http://fghh.info/img/76.jpg

What the fuck does this mean, Frank?

You’ve said nothing that was funny. At least not intentionally so.

I noticed how you never bothered to refute it.

“Relying for inspiration on a mythical character, eh?
Sounds a lot like…
Nah
It’s too easy.”

There’s a huge difference between taking inspiration from fiction and believing that fiction is real. Aesop’s fables are all fictional but meant to teach life lessons.

You can ridicule my arguments, but can’t refute them. A sure sign of a person with no working argument.

Have your fun, waste your Sunday mornings celebrating your false God. I’ll be over here with the reasonable people. You know, those of us who don’t believe anything just because it can’t be “disproven.” You know, you can’t disprove the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster… by your logic, it must exist, right?

You’re a joke.

You just described yourself perfectly.

You refuse to answer simple questions. You are convinced you are right when the facts have shown you are wrong. You have demonstrated you don’t understand science, the scientific method, atheism, polltics, etc. And your entire debating technique seems to rely on insults and vague questions.

Now, I like the insults part, nothing wrong with calling your oponent a douche. After all, it’s a fun word to say. Douche. Douche. Double douche. I think we can at least agree on that.

But you can’t insult someone is a psuedo-polite way and complain when someone responds with blunt force trauma. (Where I come from, these insults are called Timsults, good it for more details.)

(As for the vague questions, don’t ask them if you expect anything more than a vague answer. You want specifics, ask specific questions.)

I think that’s parsimony, or something.

I guess you really showed me.

No wonder Monotheism has lasted 60-plus centuries, its followers never answer any questions about their beliefs.

Well played, fd10801. Well played.

How wonderful and moronic your final comments.

I am positively glowing.

You have shown yourselves to be arrogant, rude, ignorant and ill informed.

And now you attempt to boast.

No wonder Monotheism has lasted 60 plus centuries.

Look at the competition!

Thank you for admitting defeat. You have willfully shown your position on this subject is based almost entirely in ignorance and have demonstrated an unability to back up the simpliest of claims.

Yeeeaaahhh!!! I’m number one!

I’m not going to dispute the idiocy of the question, since it was based on one of your assertions.

“It is questions like that, that have made me tire of this.”

I was actually referring to the Black Metal movement of the 1990s, not the Vikings. Hypothetically, even, if the young man in question was acting in order to “do good” and please his gods, would that have offered proof of the Christian god, as you stated?

I’m not going to email you, because then everyone following the thread would lose out.

Feel free to drop the thread. I don’t have any interest in converting you, either. I just like to ask questions.

For example: So when a young man in Norway burns down a church in a genuine effort to do “good” and please his gods (most notably Odin), that proves that the Christian god exists?
[Without doubt, the most foolish question on this thread]
from the BBC History of the Vikings:

Most scholars today believe that Viking attacks on Christian churches had nothing to do with religion, but more to do with the fact that monasteries were typically both wealthy and poorly defended, making them an easy target for plunder.

It is questions like that, that have made me tire of this.

I repeat, anyone who is truly curious can eMail me. Trust me, I have no desire to convert anyone.

You see, I am not a real good Christian, and I don’t care if all of you go to hell.

If you can’t answer the questions, just say so.

If I wanted to email you, I wouldn’t have posted here instead.

But, for the rest of you, “Stump the Believer” is over.