Sadly, Bill Fristwon’t be running for President. Too bad, the moron would have been entertaining.
Frist was of course famous for making a medical diagnosis of Terri Schiavo using video tape.
Breaking News
Oprah Quitting TV Show In 2011
Oliver Willis
Like Kryptonite To Stupid
-
-
Breaking News
- Tila Tequila Live Streaming Mental Meltdown
- 31 Die In Chinese Mine Blast In Heilongjiang Province, 82 Trapped
- Victoria Justice Stars In New Nickeloden Show “Victorious”
- CERN’s Large Hadron Collider Back Up And Running
- Megan Fox Alive For Transformers 3
- Maryna Linchuk @ 2009 Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show
- Madison Parker Works Out
- Sony Reveals Lame Attempt To Fight iTunes
- Brian Thomas: UK Man Gets Away With Killing Wife In His Sleep
- Olivia Wilde @ US Weekly Hot Hollywood 2009 Party
Live News
Kind of like DrPedo and his operating tweezers. Damn those patients and their buzzing glowing red noses!
He is also “famous” for using his medical skills to treat the victims of Hurricane Katrina without any sign of Dr. Dean in sight.
He is also “famous” for using his medical skills to treat the victims of Hurricane Katrina
Anyone get photos? Did they “get some destruction in the background”?
Then he should go back to medicine. I have no problem with him making decisions with individual patients he has seen in person, instead of attempting to pass legislation affecting all Americans, based on a diagnosis made looking at a videotape.
No quaker, I think Sean Penn had all the photographers wrapped up at that particular time…
Except, you know, Sean Penn wasn’t the top man in one of the most important legislative bodies in the WORLD.
Actor or Majority Leader of the US Senate? One has a significant effect on the lives of billions.
Here you go. Now where are those photos of Dr. Dean?
The comment in question was Frist’s callous comment during the tsunami.
And here’s Howard Dean doing cleanup in New Orleans.
No quaker, I think Sean Penn had all the photographers wrapped up at that particular time…
Then it’s a good thing we threw both of those publicity seekers out of Congress!
Man Ollie I know! Can you believe we can’t get the MSM to get photos of “the top man in one of the most important legislative bodies in the WORLD” doing medical ministrations, but you get one washed up leftist movie star with a bass boat, a shotgun and a cigarette in his mouth and the press just flocks to him…. You are correct to point out just ANOTHER demonstration of media bias against conservatives!
Come on, Pedro, if he were a washed-up Republican movie star, he’d probably…I don’t know, be governor of California now or something.
Can you believe we can’t get the MSM to get photos of “the top man in one of the most important legislative bodies in the WORLD” doing medical ministrations,
I recommend Mr. Hedley’s link.
yea, interesting how that works michael….the republican actors go on to lead this country (schwartz,reagan) and the democrat ones…well, what IS it that they do?
They act. Stick to what they’re good at.
If Ronald Reagan had stuck to acting a few million people would probably be alive now.
So Pedro’s big point is that the media prefers to take photos of entertainment celebrities instead of politicians? How big was the research grant you received for such mindblowing insight?
You guys forgot the kitten autopsies.
Yea oliver I guess there are a few million people who lived behind the berlin wall that might disagree with you…but then you and your liberal bretheren have made it clear that you would choose security over freedom any day…to each his own…
There’s a few million who died from “the gay plague” that would disagree and the wall was gonna fall regardless of what speech Ronny Raygun gave.
but then you and your liberal bretheren have made it clear that you would choose security over freedom any day
…sez Sawbones, who defends warrantless wiretapping of U.S. citizens, the use of torture, indefinite detention without charges, and denial of Habeas Corpus to captives.
Projection much, Peed’?
Please don’t get me started on AIDS….Diane Feinstein is probably the single most blameworthy individual in the US for the current rate of HIV…but that is another story..
My freedom isn’t impinged when someone who is on the telephone to al qaeda reprentatives gets tapped or when someone who isn’t a US citizen captured fighting against the US is denied habeaus corpus..
Throw up straw men much Quack?
Pedro seems to clap his hands and believe that every time the government uses its broad terror-fighting powers, it’s managed to target actual terrorists and enemy combatants. But the Bush administration is no surgeon, and the PATRIOT Act is no scalpel.
The government is paying $2 million dollars of taxpayer money to apologize for one error. That money could have been better spent on, perhaps, implementing a better terror-fighting plan than PATRIOT.
(Oh, I know, if this librul Islamofascist prof really cared about America, he would have simply shrugged his shoulders and said “Hey, man, you didn’t execute me for crimes I didn’t commit, so let’s call it even.” The nerve of him, suing for damages.)
My freedom isn’t impinged when someone who is on the telephone to al qaeda reprentatives gets tapped or when someone who isn’t a US citizen captured fighting against the US is denied habeaus corpus..
Perfect. “Rights for me, not for you.”
if you ain’t an american, then american rights don’t pertain to you (at least if youi aren’t in america).
Try screaming habeaus corpus when you get arrested in mexico sometime quaker.
Hey BD, guess how much money we paid to the families of people who died on 9/11..?
The american people are too smart to sit around waiting for liberals to come up with the “perfect” plan to fight terrorism
Try screaming habeaus corpus when you get arrested in mexico sometime quaker.
Why?
Recall, Peedro, that our founders declared that everybody has certain “unalienable” rights, not just our own citizens. Are you arguing that we can imprison foreigners without showing cause?
And we know all those brown skinned people aren’t Americans, right? Keep it up. Say it louder.
Oliver what the fuck are you talking about?
Why is it that you can make racist remarks all day long, but if I so much as mention someone from a country who may have more melanin that your average albino, I’m the racist xenophobe?
Your constant bias-baiting at media matters is starting to slip into your everyday worldview….get a grip.
dr pedro | Nov 29, 2006 8:33:16 PM
“The american people are too smart to sit around waiting for [The Decider] to come up with the “perfect” plan to fight terrorism.”
Yes, pedugger, we know. That’s how your hairy ass got kicked to kingdom come a few weeks ago.
dr pedro | Nov 29, 2006 9:46:45 PM
“I’m the racist xenophobe!”
It feels GOOD to admit it, doesn’t it, pedugger?
Pedro – Guess how much money we’ll have to pay out to the next victims because our government was wasting time and money prosecuting and later mollifying innocent terror suspects instead of doing work to catch actual terrorists.
hey BD, are we killing al qaeda terrorists in Iraq?
Well, we’re killing so many Iraqis, law of averages says some of them have to be sympathizers of al-qaeda.
I wonder if they were al-qaeda sympathizers before the US invasion.
Ah yes, the “fighting them over there so we don’t fight them here” defense.
This logic has always been false, however. We’re fighting them over there–in the country that we turned into a terrorist training ground–and we still end up having to fight them here. Or do you suppose that, if an opportunity arose to blow up the Capitol Building, al-Qaida operatives would say “Screw that, I’m going to Iraq where the action is.”
Meanwhile, our tactics and general sense of cultural superiority ensure that the Hydra in Iraq keeps growing new heads. Yes, pedro, we’re killing al-Qaida operatives in Iraq. We’re also doing absolutely nothing to keep them from gaining new recruits, ensuring that there will always be terrorists to kill. If endless war is what you want, then you should be a very, very happy man. Especially since you aren’t on the ground fighting it.
Pedro,
My freedom isn’t impinged when…
Isn’t that the same thing people said in Germany when the Nazis started attacking Communists and homosexuals?
LOL
Sorry BD, I guess you didn’t understand that it was meant to be a “yes or no” question…but thanks for the “hydra” reference…it was brilliant, just brilliant….
BD: Yes, pedro, we’re killing al-Qaida operatives in Iraq.
Hey, Pedro, sorry you can’t read.
Or is this another one of those “Only answer the question I asked” things? Because I don’t know how you pretend to have that kind of authority or command that sort of respect.
seemed like a simple question that could be simply answered…it is always telling when someone has to qualify the answer eh?
so then, back to your original statement…you agree that we ARE actually catching terrorists and that your first ridiculous statement that we weren’t was patently untrue?
your first ridiculous statement that we weren’t was patently untrue?
Did I miss it? They finally caught Osama? Was it on the news?
Actually, you talked about “killing,” not “catching.” I never said we haven’t caught or killed “any.” I said that we’re also blundering about picking up innocent men and women, quite possibly shipping them off to Gitmo or Egypt for aggressive interrogation on subjects they know nothing about.
But what does it matter? I presume this means nothing to you. This is pedro’s America, and he’s so scared of terrorists that he’d lock up a thousand innocent people if only somebody would scratch his ears and tell him the terrorists won’t get him.
Nooooo, not exactly bd.
Lets simply say that I disagree that we are “blundering about” picking up “innocent” men and women.
lets also say that I understand that a war is not the same as police work…and that is a lesson that the america hating left would do well to learn.
Which was my initial point. You would like to believe that every person our administration has picked up is at the very least “likely” to be mixed up in terrorist activities, which is why I presume you put quotes around “innocent.”
You’re scared. I understand that. The terrorists scared you, and now you’ll do anything, anything, to keep from being hurt. You see them everywhere and you’re lashing out.
I wonder if that’s what terrorists wanted to do to you. Oh well, never mind.
how long did you serve in the US military BD?
ahh…never mind
ultimately I don’t have much to fear from terrorists in general, but it strikes me as amusing that my interest in PREVENTING further attacks somehow is a sign of fear…while all the lefties here can seem to focus on is OBL who is living in a cave somewhere in the hindu kush and likely bothering only the goats he trying to get friendly with.
You’re convinced that what failed us was the Constitution. I’m convinced that what failed us was the current government.
We didn’t found this country on the current government. Yet your fear of more terrorist attacks leads you to believe that if we just gut the principles that got us here in the first place, and if we rack up enough bodies in prisons or morgues, then we’ll be safe again.
It’s a sign of fear, pedro, because you can’t hold to the ideals of this country in order to fight for them. Because the terrorists scared that out of you.
BD the ideals of this country didn’t say bend over and make it easier for the enemies of this country to attack us. I think the constitution works just fine, thanks.
But as I alluded to before, the peope here who never lifted a finger to protect the constitution are continuously attacking those of us that gave years of service to it, while at the same time professing OUR fear.
It seems somewhat ironic, in a very sad and demented way.
the peope here who never lifted a finger to protect the constitution are continuously attacking those of us that gave years of service to it,
I’m forwarding this bit to John Kerry, John Murtha, Max Cleland and Tammy Duckworth.
Protecting the Constitution is not always done behind the barrel of an M-16. Actually, the forces and ideas that most often conspire to undermine that document cannot be shot with bullets of any kind.
But I suppose for those who believe you can destroy terrorism with nothing more than massive military force, the thought that you can also defend liberty with nothing more than massive military force is consistent.
you should bring that up with Ollie BD, since he believes that we should have the entire US military standing shoulder to shoulder and scouring the Hindu Kush.
But true to form, and expected from a liberal who has never served, you misunderstand the military. The main role of the military is to DETER those who would try to remove our liberty…
Unfortunately, in a democracy, there will always be people like who have the luxury of discussing what they BELIEVE is the way to protect liberty, and others who will spend many cold nights far from home actually PROTECTING it.
Pedro -
Why do you assume I never served? Or is it still the conservative fantasy that there are no left-leaning men and women in the military?
cause people who served wouldn’t say the naive things that you do….
What branch of service and how long did you serve for BD?
The main role of the military is to DETER those who would try to remove our liberty…
Funny, I thought the main role of the military was to DEFEND our liberties. Says so right in the Presidential oath of Office, “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
So let’s say I give you that information here. Are you going to demand that I “fax you documentation”? And then more personal information that you can spin into your juvenile attempts at insults, none of which, by the way, ever have their desired effect? Screw that.
it would have just been easier if you said, “I never served” BD
I find that honesty is the best policy. If you track my comments, you will find that it is always paul malcolm (frameone) who is demanding proof of something, not I
But I do give you kudos for having enought ethics to not just lie.
And todays Most Retarded Argument award goes to…
Pedro!
For his argument that you can’t have a valid opinion on the military if you haven’t served.
Brilliant.
So now, we won’t have to listen to Pedro give any opinions on:
The President
The House
The Senate
The Supreme Court
Newspapers
Magazines
TV
(Collectively, the MSM.)
Terrorists
etc…
until he provides some sort of proof that he has been:
The President
A Representative
A Senator
A Supreme Court Justice
A Reporter
An Anchor Person
A Terrorist
Etc…
Sadly, we will have to hear his opinion on pompous assholes, since he has provided ample evidence that he is one of those.
nd,
Of course progressives have been making that very argument on this site forever. And of course, we are told there are certain issues some us just can’t understand because we are: the wrong sex, the wrong race, the wrong sexual orientation, the wrong religion, etc.
we are told there are certain issues some us just can’t understand because we are: the wrong sex, the wrong race, the wrong sexual orientation, the wrong religion, etc.
I musta been sleeping when those came ’round. Refresh my memory?
the funniest part is that I never said you couldn’t have a valid argument about the military unless you served…never. But these leftists are so embarassed by their obvious lackings that they immediately go to the kindergarten argument….
Yawn
whatever
dr pedro | Dec 1, 2006 8:02:15 PM
“I never said you couldn’t have a valid argument about the military unless you served…never.
Yawn
whatever”
When someone is handing your ass back to you AGAIN, it is the default pedugger argument slapped down on the table, regularly and predictably. Talk about “yawwwwwwwwwn”.