Comments on: Fitting http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:05:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50044 Quaker in a Basement Sat, 18 Nov 2006 03:12:48 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50044 You know what's even funnier? The last two GOP Senate candidates to concede were: Burns and Allen. Say goodnight, Gracie! You know what’s even funnier?

The last two GOP Senate candidates to concede were:

Burns
and Allen.

Say goodnight, Gracie!

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50043 Quaker in a Basement Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:37:06 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50043 <em>Intentional irony, Quake? </em> Every chance I get. Intentional irony, Quake?

Every chance I get.

]]> By: Marty http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50042 Marty Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:22:02 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50042 <blockquote>Conservatives aren't normally known for their optimism.</blockquote> Intentional irony, Quake?

Conservatives aren’t normally known for their optimism.

Intentional irony, Quake?

]]> By: VRWC drone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50041 VRWC drone Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:04:07 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50041 <i>Oh now, a right wing hack might disagree with me.</i> Quit stealing frameone's material! Oh now, a right wing hack might disagree with me.

Quit stealing frameone’s material!

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50040 Quaker in a Basement Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:02:46 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50040 <em>At this rate, we should have totally honest and clean government by 2028 or so.</em> Conservatives aren't normally known for their optimism. At this rate, we should have totally honest and clean government by 2028 or so.

Conservatives aren’t normally known for their optimism.

]]> By: Oliver http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50039 Oliver Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:43:07 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50039 Oh now, a right wing hack might disagree with me. I do declare, Mr. Beauregard! Boner. Heh. Heh. Oh now, a right wing hack might disagree with me. I do declare, Mr. Beauregard!

Boner. Heh. Heh.

]]> By: VRWC drone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50038 VRWC drone Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:31:06 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50038 <i>No, that's good enough. The Dems are less corrupt than the GOP. Then the Republicans aspire to be less corrupt than the Dems.</i> At this rate, we should have totally honest and clean government by 2028 or so. No, that’s good enough. The Dems are less corrupt than the GOP. Then the Republicans aspire to be less corrupt than the Dems.

At this rate, we should have totally honest and clean government by 2028 or so.

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50037 Quaker in a Basement Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:08:54 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50037 <em>"You might want to raise the bar a little."</em> No, that's good enough. The Dems are less corrupt than the GOP. Then the Republicans aspire to be less corrupt than the Dems. So on. Sounds like a good thing to me. “You might want to raise the bar a little.”

No, that’s good enough. The Dems are less corrupt than the GOP. Then the Republicans aspire to be less corrupt than the Dems.

So on. Sounds like a good thing to me.

]]> By: VRWC drone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50036 VRWC drone Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:58:37 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50036 <i>So the bar for the Dems is to be less corrupt than the GOP? Done.</i> While being "less corrupt than the other guy" might win arguments in the blogosphere, but I think the American people are expecting more than that from the Democrats. If not, in 2008 they might just believe some crazy claims from the GOP that now THEY can be less corrupt than the Dems. You might want to raise the bar a little. So the bar for the Dems is to be less corrupt than the GOP? Done.

While being “less corrupt than the other guy” might win arguments in the blogosphere, but I think the American people are expecting more than that from the Democrats. If not, in 2008 they might just believe some crazy claims from the GOP that now THEY can be less corrupt than the Dems.

You might want to raise the bar a little.

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50035 Quaker in a Basement Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:51:34 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50035 No problem. I've not seen many postings from conservatives that shared your reserve on the question. No problem. I’ve not seen many postings from conservatives that shared your reserve on the question.

]]> By: VRWC drone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50034 VRWC drone Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:49:26 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50034 <i>Hey, everybody! Here's a conservative who says he's taking a "wait-and-see" approach on whether the Democratic Congress will be corrupt!</i> <i>Say "Hi" to the Maytag repairman when you see him.</i> Thanks, Quaker. I'm gonna hang on to that post. Remember, despite the TV ads, the Maytag man does occasionally get service calls. Hey, everybody! Here’s a conservative who says he’s taking a “wait-and-see” approach on whether the Democratic Congress will be corrupt!

Say “Hi” to the Maytag repairman when you see him.

Thanks, Quaker. I’m gonna hang on to that post. Remember, despite the TV ads, the Maytag man does occasionally get service calls.

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50033 Quaker in a Basement Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:34:00 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50033 <em>Unless you've got a time machine (and can show us the proof), you're going to have to wait and see like the rest of us</em> Hey, everybody! Here's a conservative who says he's taking a "wait-and-see" approach on whether the Democratic Congress will be corrupt! Say "Hi" to the Maytag repairman when you see him. Unless you’ve got a time machine (and can show us the proof), you’re going to have to wait and see like the rest of us

Hey, everybody! Here’s a conservative who says he’s taking a “wait-and-see” approach on whether the Democratic Congress will be corrupt!

Say “Hi” to the Maytag repairman when you see him.

]]> By: VRWC drone http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50032 VRWC drone Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:22:02 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50032 <i>Dude, his name is Boner. I can't help but to hit at that.</i> No problem. Just don't be surprised if we fail to take your writings seriously. <i>So the bar for the Dems is to be less corrupt than the GOP? Done.</i> Unless you've got a time machine (and can show us the proof), you're going to have to wait and see like the rest of us whether or not the Dems actually manage it. Dude, his name is Boner. I can’t help but to hit at that.

No problem. Just don’t be surprised if we fail to take your writings seriously.

So the bar for the Dems is to be less corrupt than the GOP? Done.

Unless you’ve got a time machine (and can show us the proof), you’re going to have to wait and see like the rest of us whether or not the Dems actually manage it.

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50031 Quaker in a Basement Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:03:17 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50031 [cue Bevis laughter] huh..huh-huh...Boner! [cue Bevis laughter]

huh..huh-huh…Boner!

]]> By: Jody http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50030 Jody Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:58:46 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50030 Speaking of schoolyard humor, I'm still agog over the fact that the four ranking Republicans are Bush, Dick, Boner and Blunt. Methinks there's some subliminal 'speaking to the constituents' going on there... Speaking of schoolyard humor, I’m still agog over the fact that the four ranking Republicans are Bush, Dick, Boner and Blunt.

Methinks there’s some subliminal ‘speaking to the constituents’ going on there…

]]> By: Quaker in a Basement http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50029 Quaker in a Basement Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:36:26 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50029 Oh dear, dear. Perhaps we should take our conservative friends up on those civility lessons they've been promising. Oh dear, dear.

Perhaps we should take our conservative friends up on those civility lessons they’ve been promising.

]]> By: spitar1 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50028 spitar1 Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:31:03 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50028 It's pronounced Frahnken-schteen! It’s pronounced Frahnken-schteen!

]]> By: Clay Fink http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50027 Clay Fink Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:28:38 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50027 "Boner" works just fine for me. “Boner” works just fine for me.

]]> By: BD http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50026 BD Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:20:17 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50026 Actually, Odub, his name is pronounced Bay-nor. And seriously, you can do better. I'd rather see another Jessica Alba post than this kidstuff. Actually, Odub, his name is pronounced Bay-nor.

And seriously, you can do better. I’d rather see another Jessica Alba post than this kidstuff.

]]> By: Oliver http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/11/17/fitting/#comment-50025 Oliver Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:06:53 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=3188#comment-50025 Dude, his name is Boner. I can't help but to hit at that. So the bar for the Dems is to be less corrupt than the GOP? Done. Dude, his name is Boner. I can’t help but to hit at that.

So the bar for the Dems is to be less corrupt than the GOP? Done.

]]>