Will it end after the 2006 election? It might. Or might not.

See Hoover->Roosevelt, Eisenhower->Kennedy, Ford->Carter (well, maybe a bad example), Bush->Clinton.

Seems to me, the person accused of that crime resigned…IMMEDIATELY, something the democrats could learn from, but heck, those investigations just cost us tax dollars, and we can always raise taxes right?

Let me explain a little more clearly for you nimrod,

When a party loses election after election, it demonstrates that paucity of IDEAS that party has. You see, the voters don’t believe they have anything to offer, so they DON’T VOTE FOR THEM

Correct, Duros.

Ideas.

Ideas.

By the way- why is it that almost the majority of proven voter fraud has always been perptrated Democrats?

(You know it’s why you hate those voter I.D. laws.)

I really enjoy The Whiskey Bar blog, but I think he misses the boat on the vote fraud issue a bit. He falls into the trap of thinking the entire election needs to be fixed, rather than a few key races. Worse, he simply disregards the elephant in the room, namely HAVA and its mandate to force electronic voting down the throats of every American.

As for vote theft:

there’s always bradblog.com

And what decades of losing? A decade, at the most.

The main reason the MSM who are about 80% democrats are jumping on this story with two feet is, they need to have a plausible reason for a democratic failure to win both houses this election!

You see, if they exposed this horrible act (involving no less than the Barvarian Illuminati AND the Trilateral Commission!), then they won’t be able to use it as an excuse AFTER the democratic defeats. That would force the democrats to actually look inward for their decades of losing….and we can’t have that. The only reason the democrats can possible lose (at least according to them) is some sort of monkey business with the election.

I do however find it hard to beleive that hackers in general would favor the GOP.

Hey! Wait just a d*mn minute, starky. OW just did this. What is he? Chopped liver? I tell ya, OW gets no respect!

BTW, we are well along to stealing this election too. No matter what the polls say, the Republicans just might, just might - I say (moo hahahahahah), keep both houses of Congress. Better stay awake all the long night thinking about ways to stop our evil plans. I understand progressives are crawling back to Sen Nonperson and saying “Come back, Joe. We never really liked that Lamont jerk, anyway.”

Noone wants to say it out loud because the left have been screaming this since 2002. And if they make a stink about it now, they’ll have to go back and call into question the elections of 2002 and 2004 (and 2000).

The Republicans stole those elections and will attempt to steal this one.

The only difference is that the media is actually reporting on the stupidity of using these machines. We just need one major journalist to have the balls to point out that all the errors benefit Republican candidates…

To your point, Oliver, I have also wondered about that most unlikely of probabilities. I’m not sure, however, that we can say with any certainty that it is true. I haven’t really seen a thorough analysis with supporting documentation but it would be interesting to put some tangible effort to look into this. But without a doubt, the question of voting irregularities and problems are well documented and there is also little doubt that it is the Republicans who have made the supreme effort to exploit, encourage and utilize this fact to their advantage. Here in Ohio there is still a mighty effort by the Republicans to work this flawed system again. That is why it is very important that we be prepared this go-round to spotlight these instances right away and make sure that the rug is not pulled out from under us once again.