Are they serious?
Appearing in support of embattled GOP Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds (R-N.Y.), Karl Rove offered biting jibes against House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), took a shot at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and asserted that Democratic policies would leave the country weaker.
"You can’t say I want to win the war but not be willing to fight the war," said Rove, Bush’s top political adviser. "And if leading Democrats have their way, our nation will be weaker and the enemies of our nation will be stronger. And that’s a stark fact, and it’s the reason that this fall election will turn very heavily on national security."
So, while campaigning for a pedophile enabler, Karl Rove argues that the party of 9/11, Katrina, and Iraq is somehow stronger than the Democrats? Who do you believe, the White House spin or your own eyes?
What Rove is doing is intensifying the rhetoric that he began after the Foley scandal. The GOP will get louder as they attack Pelosi and continue blaming Clinton for all their screw ups.
The beautiful thing: it’s not working, as the polling trends will attest.
It’ll be great watching Rove squirm, as all worms eventually must do as when they wither on the pavement after being flushed out by a healthy deluge.
My eyes, ears and brain tell me core Democrats will surrrender in Iraq and are much weaker on terrorism. They want to ‘understand’ the terrorists- poverty based angst. They want to try these poor misunderstood terrorists in our legal ystem – with each getting little Johhnny Cochran murder-enabling attorney to get them out so that they may murder more Americans and Democrats can wring their hands some more about how to make the terrorists like them.
Dugger, STFU, that turd won’t flush anymore.
Wow, Dugger’s still trying that old canard. I’m starting to wonder if he’s just the longest running troll parody in internet history.