Caution, Journalism Ahead

7:15 pm EST October 8th, 2006 | Media | 9 Comments

Wolf Blitzer makes the sin of not allowing a Republican guest to just yammer on his talking points. "Do you have any evidence to back that charge up?" is such a simple question, but one that Republicans can never answer honestly.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

9 Responses to “Caution, Journalism Ahead”

  1. doug r says:
    October 8, 2006 at 7:30 pm

    OMFG, Wolfie and Howie in the same week! Is it now the Courageous News Network?

  2. Dr. Anatole Gavage-Huskanoy says:
    October 9, 2006 at 12:32 am

    Shorter trolls: Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton!

    Personal responsibility?

  3. dr. Anatole Gavage-Huskanoy says:
    October 9, 2006 at 12:36 am

    Whoops, I meant to post this on the post about Bush’s massive North Korea fuckup. Although the blame-democrats-first principle applies to this issue as well.

  4. Duros62 says:
    October 9, 2006 at 11:04 am

    Dr., the blame-the-democrats-first principle can be applied to any situation.
    And it is just as lame in any situation.

  5. Duros62 says:
    October 9, 2006 at 11:07 am

    MCHENRY: No. It’s a question, Wolf. The question remains, were they involved? And if they were not involved, they need to say clearly. And it’s a question. It’s not an accusation.

    Questions swirl!

  6. Rex Mundane says:
    October 9, 2006 at 11:21 am

    The fact points also lead to another question: Did Patrick McHenry, or some other political operative working in his employ, assassinate president Kennedy, unearth his corpse, and then rape the skull of the deceased president, believing that doing do would grant him superhuman powers? McHenry has so far refused to comment on the issue, but questions remain circling around this issue.

  7. buma says:
    October 9, 2006 at 11:20 pm

    Maybe the Republicans testing out the latest ‘look over here’ response will first offer their own testimony under oath that they knew nothing of Foley’s page fetish until ABC released the content of his IMs. Nah.

  8. dr pedro says:
    October 10, 2006 at 6:55 pm

    Hmmm…did Rahm emmanual do any better on sunday. “Did you have any knowledge of these emails”? Rahm “I never saw them…” “But did you have KNOWLEDGE of them?”….” I never saw them…” repeat….

    Then of course George Soros and his CREW group who actually DID seem them, months ago, but would divulge the contents in their entirety to the FBI…yea, not waiting for the opportune moment eh?

  9. Nimrod Gently says:
    October 11, 2006 at 10:35 am

    Well done for dealing with the subject at hand, which is the ridiculous Republican spin that the Foley scandal is an October Surprise (didn’t it break in September anyway?)