I reiterate: Another bogus accusation and standard diversion. Try and discuss the issue and ask people to reconcile some of the things they are saying with other legal and moral aspects and it becomes a ‘defense’ of Foley.

Nothing could be further from the truth so grow up.

And you have a “history” with JK? Who fucking cares. God, you’re a moron, Jay.

J: “I defended torture and refused to let liberals call a Republican Congressman who solicited 16-year-olds a pedophile!”

GC: “Awesome, Grampa!”

Jay. What in the WORLD is your problem?

You can qualify, qualify, and qualify your defense.

There’s no defense for this, however. You of all people on the right, should know better.

Jay…we went through some “wars,” didn’t we?

You’re the one guy on the right side of the blogosphere I have some level of respect for, as a person, a father, and a decent human being.

My advice. Pick your battles, dude. This ain’t one of them.

JK

Which is why Jay is all fired up to get Oliver to stop calling Foley a pedophile. Jay thinks Foley is better than pedophiles because Foley likes it Barely Legal. Awesome intellectual contribution to the thread, Jay. Just awesome.

Squawk!! “Awesome Jay!” Squawk!! “Awesom Jay!” Squawk!!

Go have a cracker Polly.

I’m sorry that my contributions cannot extend beyond saying ‘awesome’ like Jeff Spiccoli or calling people ‘idiots.’ If only I could be so smart…

Which is why Jay is all fired up to get Oliver to stop calling Foley a pedophile. Jay thinks Foley is better than pedophiles because Foley likes it Barely Legal. Awesome intellectual contribution to the thread, Jay. Just awesome.

This must be the New Intellectualism. Right, Jay?

What a moron.

Look closely. It was Quaker who wrote it. And you’re wrong. The age of consent in most states is 16. Therefore, a 60 year old could have sex with a 16 year old in DC and it wouldn’t be illegal.

One more thing JK: Never has there been more of an opportune time for the Democrats to win something. Guess what? They’ll still fuck it up.

First of all, I didn’t ask Oliver to be fair to Foley you stupid ass.

Second of all, after all you guys have been hearing for the last five years? Give me a freaking break. The level of shrill rhetoric eminating from the Democrats and the left has reached levels that destroys ear drums.

As for the rest of your comment, stop sounding like such a frigging Mary. Get a life.

Wanna bet on that one? In almost any state, such an act would be prosecuted and involve serious jail time in the event of conviction. Surely you didn’t actually intend to write that? If so the republicans are more desperate than I thought.

You’re asking Oliver to be FAIR to Foley after all of the crap we’ve been hearing from you morons for the past 5 years?

Jay Caruso, you have a lot of nerve.

The timing of this scandal couldn’t be better in my opinion, and I’d be positively gleeful if not for the fact that a minor was exploited.

You SOB’s DESERVE to be swept out of power this Fall, and two years from now, for what you are putting this country through.

In some cases, simply being “removed” from power may not be good enough. (As is the case with this particular creepy person.)

To think that you all got OUTRAGED about a BJ in the Oval Office….

You guys SICKEN, SICKEN, SICKEN me.

JK

OK, look. This is my last word on the matter, I promise. You want to look for reasons to fight with Jay? Have at it. He likes a good wallow as much as anybody.

The law codifies society’s consensus about allowable behavior. Whether you think Mr. Foley is a criminal because he violated statute or you think he’s immoral because he violated the consensus underlying the state is an angels-on-the-head-of-a-pin argument.

Watching a Republican pleading for toned-down rhetoric, after weeks of “Islamofascism” and “defeatocrats” would make me chuckle for minutes if it weren’t so truly and disturbingly weird.

He wants us to forget that trolling for minors over the internet is illegal.

later in same post
Where has he been clear about that? Again, he called me an idiot because I said that Foley’s abuse of power was worse than some federal law that makes it a crime for Foley to ask a page to measure his dick. Frame obviously disagreed and called me an idiot in the process.

He’s trivializing the law as “some federal law that makes it a crime for Foley to ask a page to measure his dick” and talking about a “real crime” which isn’t really a crime.

That tells me he doesn’t take this law seriously this law.