Michelle Malkin Bikini Shots?

7:59 pm EST September 29th, 2006 | Uncategorized | 15 Comments

Possibly real?
Possibly fake?
Does Malkin eat puppies?
Is Michelle Malkin a serial liar?
Michelle Malkin: Threat To Freedom?
Michelle Malkin: An Al Qaeda Operative?

We’ve got questions?
Questions swirl.

Malkinbikini

Topic:

Related Posts

«
»

15 Responses to “Michelle Malkin Bikini Shots?”

  1. scott says:
    September 30, 2006 at 12:52 am

    michelle, have my children. i don’t care if you’re crazy. lets at least get a beer, coffee…motel room?

  2. tomboyms says:
    September 30, 2006 at 1:55 am

    Ewww. I’m not impressed.

  3. RedBastardGod says:
    September 30, 2006 at 10:33 am

    “Brand Democrat – On the Cutting Edge of the Politics of Personal Destruction.

    You must be so proud.”

    WATB

  4. GravyPan says:
    September 30, 2006 at 10:52 am

    It’s OK if you’re a Democrat.

  5. Organic George says:
    September 30, 2006 at 11:05 am

    HUYECCH – CHOKE – BARF – HUYECCH

  6. P_M says:
    September 30, 2006 at 12:22 pm

    Bill O’Luffahs keyboard is sticky.

  7. Waveflux says:
    September 30, 2006 at 12:36 pm

    Nah. Just as the real Malkin’s heart is two sizes too small, so too is the head in this obviously Photoshopped image.

  8. JK says:
    September 30, 2006 at 3:22 pm

    Funny how someone’s disgusting, revolting ideology can turn what should be an attractive woman, into Rosanne Barr.

    JK

  9. Tuco Ramirez the Rat says:
    October 1, 2006 at 9:32 am

    Oliver, you should be ashamed of yourself for jumping on this pathetic bandwagon.

    Someone used pictures of Ashley Herzog, an Ohio University student, without her permission, and put Michelle Malkin’s head on her body.

    Certain reprobate lefty bloggers jump on the photos with great glee and use them to slime Malkin with a lack of human decency that is sad, but not surprising.

    Any person would with a shred of integrity would apologize at this point, but I don’t expect Oliver and the riff raff to step up to the plate.

    “Brand Democrat” indeed.

    P.S.: Bringing up Foley’s reprehensible behavior is not an argument with which to defend or deflect the perpretators of this hoax.

  10. Bill L. says:
    October 1, 2006 at 8:51 pm

    Besides the way obvious fact that the head is too small (as Waveflux noted earlier), this all seems to be a glib excuse to take pot shots at Malkin. Her reprehensible attitude on a host of issues make her repellent enough without the need for any Photoshop fiddling.

  11. jimmmm says:
    October 2, 2006 at 10:09 am

    Oh my god, that’s horrible–exploiting a public figure. Almost as horrible as, say, a sitting Congressman making indecent proposals to minors.

    Sorry, Cons, your ‘right’ to express moral indignation is suspended until the House conspiracy to cover for Foley is unravelled.

  12. Rounds77 says:
    October 2, 2006 at 11:28 am

    Hell, if I were going to doctor a photo of her, I would’ve attached her noggin to an alligator’s body.

  13. Nimrod Gently says:
    October 2, 2006 at 11:59 am

    So many glass houses, destroyed.

    And what have we got to apologise for? Leering, at best, and that still beats the track record of the crazy racist self-pitying banshee in question. Even if she is somewhat attractive, tattyshopped photo notwithstanding.

  14. George Felix Allen says:
    October 2, 2006 at 3:30 pm

    Mmmmmh! I love them hot maccacalahs.

  15. Republican Congressman Mark Foley says:
    October 2, 2006 at 4:35 pm

    She has kind of a boyish figure. I like that.