Comments on: Republican Mark Foley: Interested In Young Boys?

By: factcheck

factcheck — Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:48:36 +0000

buma, this is a real life implementation of the “dead girl, live boy” theory.

Joe Scarborough had the dead girl think a few years ago, and Mark Foley had the “live boy” scenario yesterday.

These Republicans can’t help themselves!

By: buma

buma — Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:41:39 +0000

jay is looking so good on this one, taking the side of the pedophile because the guy is a republican. When are these enablers like jay going to stop the blindness?
For years people have been asking what it would take for republicans to demand the impeachment of bush. Now at last we know where they might draw the line.

By: z adura

z adura — Sat, 30 Sep 2006 04:08:01 +0000

Cortney has an Emily Litela moment.

By: Cortney

Cortney — Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:26:15 +0000

This is ridiculous. 16 is a precious age. You can be cruel or innocent. At 16, I did a lot if instigating and accepted a lot of crap from people. I read the emails. For you guys to accuse him of pedophilia is disgusting. Pedophiles should rot in HELL. Those emails prove nothing. You are burning him without sufficient evidence. He shouldn’t have resigned, It makes him look more guilty. This country is about justice, and innocent until proven guilty, What happened to that theory?

By: jimmmm

jimmmm — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:05:25 +0000

True. Foley resigns. Pleads insanity: “I’m just crazy about young boy flesh!!!”

Also true?: Jay Teabag is a fuckwit pedophile enabler. We report, you decide.

By: factcheck

factcheck — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:44:29 +0000

Disturbing if true…

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:37:16 +0000

Or, a la Chris Wallace, “Viewer emails want to know…”

By: factcheck

factcheck — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:27:38 +0000

High placed sources say…

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:14:10 +0000

All I said was there was no evidence that Foley was a pedophile.

Not much evidence that he isn’t one, either.

Oliver, you wrapped your accusation in a question, nothing more.

Questions swirl.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:52:41 +0000

Oliver, you wrapped your accusation in a question, nothing more.

By: Dugger

Dugger — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:59:06 +0000

There are some decent posts here, all around.

Just my two cents.

By: Quaker in a Basement

Quaker in a Basement — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:06:02 +0000

Pretty tame stuff.

So Foley e-mailed the kid. Last I heard, that’s still within the bounds of acceptable behavior.

If there’s more to the story, it will come out. But this isn’t worth making a fuss about.

By: Oliver Willis

Oliver Willis — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:39:10 +0000

Where am I accusing Rep. Foley of being a pedophile. The title of the post is “Republican Mark Foley: Interested In Young Boys?”

By: Hattie

Hattie — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:59:29 +0000

Who is the culprit here? Surely not Oliver. I don’t think his taste runs to the underaged, as far as I can tell.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:36:49 +0000

Jadey, stop trying to change the subject.

Once again (another one with reading comprehension problems), I said that pedophilia is disgusting and that for Oliver to accuse Foley of such without proof makes him a jackass.

Comprende? My comments were not directed at what Oliver did not say. My comments were directed at what he did say.

By: Jadegold

Jadegold — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:25:36 +0000

All I said was there was no evidence that Foley was a pedophile.

Then you’d have no problem with somebody three times your kid’s age corresponding with him?

Especially when your own kid thinks it’s untoward?

I guess you have to take one for the team.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:52:30 +0000

All I said was there was no evidence that Foley was a pedophile.

But I would have better luck bending steel with my brainwaves than to expect you to actually engage in any sort intellectual honesty.

By: Jadegold

Jadegold — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:41:52 +0000

Again, Jay Caruso, even you might have a problem with someone about 40 years older than your kid corresponding in such a way.

Or maybe not.

Anything for the GOP, huh?

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:12:01 +0000

DC’s a small town. Foley’s been the subject of these rumors for almost a decade.

Yeah and I heard the rumors about you barnyard animals.

Just when I thought I had a reprieve from true Internet creeps, Jadegold gets a furlough and spreads his stench around the blogosphere again.

When do you go back inside Jadey?

By: z adura

z adura — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:07:37 +0000

I certainly hope that some of the other e-mails are more direct than this one, because although inappropriate and creepy, this in no way rises to the level of pedophilia. Hopefully, we don’t turn into the slimy Republicans in an effort to defeat our opponents.