“Parts?”
Tweet
Look, Bushie, either release the whole thing or this will stink of usual administration spinning.
8 Responses to ““Parts?””
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America

Only Democrats are allowed to selectivly quote!!
Parts? You had no problem declaring, “George Bush And The Rise of Terrorism” when you read a selected ‘part’ of the NIE in the NY Times.
Waiting for the other parts to be released as a pop-up.
Bush’s NIE release: “Clinton… did… it.”
Jay makes an excellent point. We can get unverified snippets of the report and conclude the godd*mn Summa Theologica of leftist paranoia, but the release of whole sections somehow is a Republican cover-up??
Whats next? Release the entire report and if progressives don’t like it, would you like it edited to include some of your hate fanasies?
By the way, anybody on the left even one tiny iota concerned about security and the WOT? That worth even a passing thought in the rush to string Bush up?
Remember how well Plame worked for you?
Certainly Bush and the right aren’t concerned, or else thousands of American lives wouldn’t have been lost to terror on their watch.
Gotta love Dugger.
While completely sidestepping the ongoing problem wih this administration’s fetish for stiffling honest and open debate, he goes to the well once again and drags up the tired strawman about the Left being weak or unconcerned with security…because they oppose this mendacious gang of criminals and their war profiteering, terrorism boosting, innocent life wasting cronies. Got that? Standing up to quite possibly the most corrupt administration in American history must mean you are weak. See? Did I mention up is the new down? Now roll over for me like a true patriot!
Pathetic.
“Gotta love Dugger.”
Well Bill, I frankly don’t love you. You tend to post nonsense and then avoid any debate – which tells me something.
An example of nonsense from you? This post. Is maintaining security in the WOT, stifling debate?
Bill, Were you the one claiming economic conditions as a root cause of terrorism?