No, no, Dugger is just drinking. It was, apparently, Frank D who was masturbating.

“I appease terrorists, just like my hero G. W. And a special kudos to Bin Laden, al Qaeda, and the Taliban for finding a safe place to wage war against civilization or freedom or whatever the hype of the day is.”

Hmm. I could just declare victory and move on. The kids have given up arguing that ‘nobody is advocating invading Pakistan’. Even frame-the-frantic-hater asserts ‘Pakistan fits the profile of a country that we should invade’. But its really a lot of fun mocking ‘fact’check’s name when he asserts idiotic things like we paid Pakistan to harbor OBL. But then no other adults take that crap seriously and I’m probably wasting my time with them and maybe being a little cruel. They are probaly just kids who don’t know jacksh*t about the world. I think I’ll just declare victory and move on. This is two bad outing in a row for them. Wonder what happened to ‘chum’ and his Trotskyist conpiracies. That was fun. Man, the Redskins suck. Glad I’m not a fan of them.”

Is Dugger drinking and masturbating while he’s posting? He thinks he’s ‘outing’ people …? WTF?

Um, Dugger, if you could please quote my full sentence:

“Now I’m not advocating invading Pakistan but if we’re supposed to take the Bush Doctrine seriously, and I’m assuming that Bush and his supporters do, Pakistan fits the profile of a country that we should invade.”

Any idiot who could read would understand from reading this that:

1) I am not advocating the invasion of Pakistan
2) According to Bush’s own stated policy dubbed the Bush Doctrine, we had greater reason to invade Pakistan than Iraq.
3)By respecting Pakistan’s sovereignty Bush is repudiating/directly contradicting his own doctrine.

You are, apparently, both dumber than the average idiot and dishonest to boot. Newsflash.

Hmm. I could just declare victory and move on. The kids have given up arguing that ‘nobody is advocating invading Pakistan’. Even frame-the-frantic-hater asserts ‘Pakistan fits the profile of a country that we should invade’. But its really a lot of fun mocking ‘fact’check’s name when he asserts idiotic things like we paid Pakistan to harbor OBL. But then no other adults take that crap seriously and I’m probably wasting my time with them and maybe being a little cruel. They are probaly just kids who don’t know jacksh*t about the world. I think I’ll just declare victory and move on. This is two bad outing in a row for them. Wonder what happened to ‘chum’ and his Trotskyist conpiracies. That was fun. Man, the Redskins suck. Glad I’m not a fan of them.

torure boy, lol.

No, dugger, once again you have yourself muddied the issue. My problem with it (IMO) is the revisionist history that the Bush clan practice. Yesterday, anywone that harbored terrorists was a target, regardless of soverignty. Today, we gotta ask nicely. “Excuse me, if it isn’t too much of a problem, have you seen a 6 foot 4 diabetic Saudi around here and if so, can we have him?”

Black is the new white.
Ignorance is Strength.
OBEY

Liberals don’t advocate invading a sovreign country to find a terrorist who may or may not be there, do they?

Come on, facty, deeper in the Big Muddy.

3) that liberals rightly point out the difference between “We fight the terrorists and we fight all of those who give them aid.” and giving Pakistan billions to harbor OBL.
4) Duggers an idiot.

How ’bout you guys?

“Waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the damn fools keep yelling to push on”

Go back on your meds torture boy.

Um, please tell me then the new reasons for why we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, because I thought we invaded the first to get Bin Laden and Al Qeada and that we invaded the second to protect ourselves.

Now I’m not advocating invading Pakistan but if we’re supposed to take the Bush Doctrine seriously, and I’m assuming that Bush and his supporters do, Pakistan fits the profile of a country that we should invade. Far more than Iraq.

He’s losing it quickly. I’ve never been a fan of “eastiest” fixes myself, I much prefer the westiest fixes.

I’ve heard this RW meme for awhile and it is exactly wrong. Even if OBL was reformed from his evil, doesn’t he have to answer for his crimes? Not in wingnutland.

As a liberal poster to this site so cleverly said a few days ago
“Knocking down strawman never killed a terrorist”

What is the duger plan?

NO ONE HERE IS ADVOCATING INVADING PAKISTAN, YOU ZIPPERHEAD!!!!

Now you are saying that because OBL is on the loose he does not pose a threat to America…

I can’t brain anymore.

“What was that bit in the campaign about not seeking permission from other countries to protect America?’

Well since you’re the new guy (at least sig), what does your statement have to do with the issue at hand? Why exactly do we need to invade Pakistan to protect ourselves. Are you suggetsing we should invade Pakistan to find out IF OBL is thre? Otherwise, why invade?

Hey at least the progressives advocating invading Pakistan have a positon, a stupid one, but one of their own making. You second stringers have no position and don’t like anybody else’s position.

And hey what about my idea of having Soros and Turner send some of the $billons they just have lying around to end the econmic causes of terrorism. Isn’t that the eastsiest fix of all? If we give them money, they will like us!

buma, Doesn’t like Israel fighting back against Hamas.