Rumsfeld is on the attack again, aided by the right wing noise machine. Democrats are – somewhat predictably – responding to Rumsfeld by actually taking him seriously. Why? Why do they keep doing this? Donald Rumsfeld is the worst secretary of defense in the history of our country.
- He is presiding over a losing war on terror, endangering American lives
- He helped cook the book on intelligence leading us into war
- He is losing the war in Iraq, losing thousands of American lives
- He has presided over the worst torture scandal in the history of the military
If Donald Rumsfeld tells you that it looks rainy today, you’d be wise to double check. Don’t take him seriously. The guys a loser and a failure. Every day he’s in his job America is in more danger.
Why does he always talk like that? Asking himself questions?
Les Aspin’s poor judgement contributed to the deaths of roughly two dozen servicemen. For that he lost his job. What’s required for Bush to decide it’s time for Rumsfeld to go?
Bush won’t replace Rumsfeld. What other fool out there is going to “stay the course”, which is all Bush wants to do.
Dugger.
LOL
I seriously wonder what forcing out but Rumsfeld will do, aside from some symbolic, rally-the-forces-of-good victory. There will be another dink to be the next Rummy, and he will have pretty much the same policy.
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice. They ALL need to go.
I’ve noticed that Democrats seem to have an unhealthy obsession with “the worst ________ in the history of ________.”
I would suggest professional help immediately. Or at least reading some good books on The Civil War, World War II, and Vietnam.
Okay, so what was the worst torture scandal in the history of the (presumably US) military then?
Take your time. Actually, no, don’t. Answer the question, dammit, since you’re so damn confident that Not Just Abu Ghraib isn’t it.