Oh was that the point of the link? I don’t know his intent in that picture, or the context. Do you? He could have been waving to someone.

Either that or Coulter’s. Easy choice from where I sit.

Oh, right.

Right Quaker. We just take USA Today’s word for it.

No, for refusing to submit to routine editing. No writer on earth gets away with that.

Your point being what, exactly? Coulter still has a nationally syndicated column, a web site and Sean Hannity’s d*ck in her mouth and still finds the time to call for executions of American citizens. American Citizens.
Find one instance of Olberman calling for someone’s death (baseball commisioner notwithstanding).

See if you can guess what I’m thinking right now.

Oh yeah, and answer the question, pretty please.

b) Olbermann has not compared Bill to Hitler (seriously), he’s jokingly referred to him as an apologist for Hitler a few times over that whole Malmedy clusterfuck

Where’s the Dugger who likes to hoist people on the petard of mind reading?

He went to visit the Dugger who’s internally consistent. They don’t usually let him out.

Wait. I’m not sure I follow.

Olbermann compares someone who is not Rumsfeld or Bush to Hilter. Therefore when he uses the word “Fascist” he really means Hitler?

Where’s the Dugger who likes to hoist people on the petard of mind reading?

The difference between Obie and Ann C? Obie has national TV show and USA Today fired AC for being controversial.

That’s pretty lame, Dugger.

Calling someone fascist isn’t the same thing as comparing someone to Hitler. Calling someone a communist isn’t the same as comparing someone to Mao.

If it worked that way, then calling someone a vegetarian would be comparing him or her to Hitler. So would calling someone a lousy painter or a sawed-off runt.

God, that is great. He’s so off the wall calling for the assasination of judges, journalists and Congressmen. Oh wait, that was Ann coulter.

Go back to your venerated Webster’s and look up the definition on fascism.

We’ll wait.

Bill O’Reilly mops the floor with his supercilious smirking butt every night.
Yes, pretty good for Comedy variety show, though your’e facts are, once again, questionable.

“This country faces a new type of fascism” still isn’t the same thing as actively comparing Bush to Hitler, and you know it. Face it, all you’ve got are desperate join-the-dots insinuations, strawmen, and pathetic “my pundit can beat up your pundit” bollocks. Olbermann owned an entire mentality of which you are a part, and you’re punch-drunk and unable to counter him because you know he’s right.

“And about Mr. Rumsfeld’s other main assertion, that this country faces a “new type of fascism. As he was correct to remind us how a government that knew everything could get everything wrong, so too was he right when he said that — though probably not in the way he thought he meant it.

This country faces a new type of fascism – indeed.”

You can interpet that any way you want. I think he’s calling the Admin fascist (and he wasn’t talking about Mussolini). The man is a weak minded left wing extremiust smirking jerk. His ratings are in the trash can because people think. Bill O’Reilly mops the floor with his supercilious smirking butt every night.

This is classic right wing idiocy in action. Farris, it doesn’t matter how many “fronts” Rumsfeld listed, indeed, the more “fronts” he lists the more blatantly false his comment is because NO DEMOCRATS ARE TALKING ABOUT APPEASING THE TERRORISTS.

And Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, citing passivity toward Nazi Germany before World War II, said that “many have still not learned history’s lessons” and “believe that somehow vicious extremists can be appeased.”

Pressed to support these allegations, the White House yesterday could cite no major Democrat who has proposed cutting off funds or suggested that withdrawing from Iraq would persuade terrorists to leave Americans alone. But White House and Republican officials said those are logical interpretations of the most common Democratic position favoring a timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq.

Blatantly stolen from Kevin Drum:

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_08/009428.php

We now have definitive proof that Dugger is brain damaged. Poor guy.