Comments on: Why Must Mexico Always Beat Us? http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/ Like Kryptonite To Stupid Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:35:25 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: midderpidge http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42636 midderpidge Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:40:30 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42636 Jay is typical right wing, he doesn't care that the 'wrong' people aren't allowed to vote. Just like he doesn't care that the 'wrong' people's civil rights are thrown out so he can get over his lack of bladder control. Jay is typical right wing, he doesn’t care that the ‘wrong’ people aren’t allowed to vote. Just like he doesn’t care that the ‘wrong’ people’s civil rights are thrown out so he can get over his lack of bladder control.

]]> By: Rounds77 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42635 Rounds77 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:32:18 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42635 Maybe not. After 9/11, the Republicans would have sought a candidate with outstanding war credentials, like McCain. I doubt they would have propped up a candidate with a dubious national guard record. Maybe not. After 9/11, the Republicans would have sought a candidate with outstanding war credentials, like McCain. I doubt they would have propped up a candidate with a dubious national guard record.

]]> By: Nimrod Gently http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42634 Nimrod Gently Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:20:20 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42634 Well, apart from the fact that the incumbent in 2004 actually lost the previous election, it was legit, in that Bush actually won fair and square, which was immensely depressing. Well, apart from the fact that the incumbent in 2004 actually lost the previous election, it was legit, in that Bush actually won fair and square, which was immensely depressing.

]]> By: Rounds77 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42633 Rounds77 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:16:01 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42633 If 2000 was stolen, doesn't logic dictate that 2004 was stolen as well? Certainly, if Bush ran again in '04 not as an incumbant but as a once defeated candidate, the results would have been completely different. I'm referring to the butterfly effect. And, Jay, talk about sore losing crybabies. My God, look what the right did to Clinton just because he won. Man! Talk about sore losers. If 2000 was stolen, doesn’t logic dictate that 2004 was stolen as well? Certainly, if Bush ran again in ‘04 not as an incumbant but as a once defeated candidate, the results would have been completely different.

I’m referring to the butterfly effect. And, Jay, talk about sore losing crybabies. My God, look what the right did to Clinton just because he won. Man! Talk about sore losers.

]]> By: Nimrod Gently http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42632 Nimrod Gently Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:50:25 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42632 We lost fair and square in 2004, despite the odd what-Condoleeza-Rice-would-call-teething-problems, but not in 2000. And admit it or not, you know that perfectly well, unless you have the memory of a retarded goldfish. Whatever you say, it means nothing, because I know that you could not look me in the eye and tell me that election wasn't stolen. And you could not look me in the eye and claim you'd have precisely the same opinion if the events of 2000 had applied to Gore instead of Bush. We lost fair and square in 2004, despite the odd what-Condoleeza-Rice-would-call-teething-problems, but not in 2000. And admit it or not, you know that perfectly well, unless you have the memory of a retarded goldfish. Whatever you say, it means nothing, because I know that you could not look me in the eye and tell me that election wasn’t stolen. And you could not look me in the eye and claim you’d have precisely the same opinion if the events of 2000 had applied to Gore instead of Bush.

]]> By: LeonS http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42631 LeonS Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:49:24 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42631 <em>It's ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts.</em> <b>Well maybe if the Democrats in those counties that were in charge of the process weren't such incompetent twits, there wouldn't have been such problems.</b> Um, the broken machines were sent by the Republican Sec of State. Is someone an "incompetent twit" if they can't make an broken machine work? If you dispute that account then say so, but by bring up a distracting counter-point you show that really don't care about anything else but the political party you think is on your side winning. Certainly not Democracy, and certainly not America. There are plenty of countries that don't have a fair vote you can move to. Leave American to those who love it. It’s ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts.

Well maybe if the Democrats in those counties that were in charge of the process weren’t such incompetent twits, there wouldn’t have been such problems.

Um, the broken machines were sent by the Republican Sec of State. Is someone an “incompetent twit” if they can’t make an broken machine work? If you dispute that account then say so, but by bring up a distracting counter-point you show that really don’t care about anything else but the political party you think is on your side winning. Certainly not Democracy, and certainly not America.

There are plenty of countries that don’t have a fair vote you can move to. Leave American to those who love it.

]]> By: factcheck http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42630 factcheck Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:45:20 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42630 Oooh, crazy jay is angry! Maybe he should be angry that he has no way to prove that his vote was recorded, but no, it's all the big bad librul's fault!!! You would think having an accurate vote count and allowing all citizens to vote equally would be a non-partisan issue, but..... Oooh, crazy jay is angry! Maybe he should be angry that he has no way to prove that his vote was recorded, but no, it’s all the big bad librul’s fault!!!

You would think having an accurate vote count and allowing all citizens to vote equally would be a non-partisan issue, but…..

]]> By: Jay http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42629 Jay Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:30:14 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42629 Go. Fuck. Yourself. Babies. All of you. <i>It's ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts.</i> Well maybe if the Democrats in those counties that were in charge of the process weren't such incompetent twits, there wouldn't have been such problems. Anybody that sits around and talks about "stolen elections", "coup d'etat", "fraudulent results" is a nothing but a goddamned crybaby. It's as simple as that. Grow up already. As for 2004, Kerry is blubbering in some letter about Ohio. You guys lost and you lost fair and square. Stop fucking crying about it already. Go. Fuck. Yourself.

Babies. All of you.

It’s ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts.

Well maybe if the Democrats in those counties that were in charge of the process weren’t such incompetent twits, there wouldn’t have been such problems.

Anybody that sits around and talks about “stolen elections”, “coup d’etat”, “fraudulent results” is a nothing but a goddamned crybaby.

It’s as simple as that.

Grow up already.

As for 2004, Kerry is blubbering in some letter about Ohio.

You guys lost and you lost fair and square. Stop fucking crying about it already.

]]> By: Nimrod Gently http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42628 Nimrod Gently Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:07:58 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42628 I know. That's why I get so angry at people acting all smug and ah-ha-you're-only-bitter-cause-you-lost about the fact that George Bush was originally elected by a judicial coup d'etat. I know. That’s why I get so angry at people acting all smug and ah-ha-you’re-only-bitter-cause-you-lost about the fact that George Bush was originally elected by a judicial coup d’etat.

]]> By: factcheck http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42627 factcheck Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:09:43 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42627 Nimrod, the sad thing is he knows it, but doesn't care, because his "team" won. It's ok to them that thousands of African-Americans were disenfranchised. It's ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts. Nimrod, the sad thing is he knows it, but doesn’t care, because his “team” won. It’s ok to them that thousands of African-Americans were disenfranchised. It’s ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts.

]]> By: Nimrod Gently http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42626 Nimrod Gently Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:45:01 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42626 Shut. The. Fuck. Up. As far as 2000 goes, counting the votes ONCE would be nice. 2004 was essentially legit, but there's still a lot of suspicious bollocks around Ohio which you'd care deeply about if it went the opposite way. Plus the very existence of Diebold voting machines is total bullshit. Don't act like a smug dick just because you got away with it. 2000 was stolen and you know it. Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

As far as 2000 goes, counting the votes ONCE would be nice.

2004 was essentially legit, but there’s still a lot of suspicious bollocks around Ohio which you’d care deeply about if it went the opposite way. Plus the very existence of Diebold voting machines is total bullshit.

Don’t act like a smug dick just because you got away with it. 2000 was stolen and you know it.

]]> By: Jay http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42625 Jay Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:43:29 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42625 <i>Oh sure, we had big protests in Florida about the disputed (and fraudulent) results of a presidential election</i> Hahaha....man. You guys will never get over being beat. COUNT THE VOTES! (Again and again and again and again and again....how long? UNTIL WE GET THE RESULTS WE WANT!!!) Mexico is no different. The left loses and it HAS to be because somebody stole it. Oh sure, we had big protests in Florida about the disputed (and fraudulent) results of a presidential election

Hahaha….man. You guys will never get over being beat.

COUNT THE VOTES! (Again and again and again and again and again….how long? UNTIL WE GET THE RESULTS WE WANT!!!)

Mexico is no different. The left loses and it HAS to be because somebody stole it.

]]> By: PD100 http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/08/28/why-must-mexico-always-beat-us/#comment-42624 PD100 Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:14:53 +0000 http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2616#comment-42624 Feh. That "One man, one vote" notion is so 1999. Feh. That “One man, one vote” notion is so 1999.

]]>