Why Must Mexico Always Beat Us?
Tweet
Oh sure, we had big protests in Florida about the disputed (and fraudulent) results of a presidential election, but unlike Mexico we didn’t have freaking masked luchadores carrying coffins in the street.
This round goes to you, Mexico.
13 Responses to “Why Must Mexico Always Beat Us?”
GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Facing House Ethics Probe For Insider Trading
Jennifer Aniston Reportedly Pregnant With Twins
PHOTOS: Tamara Ecclestone At The Langham Hotel
Red Front? “Center For American Freedom” Logo Echoes Communist Style
Romney Calls For Defunding Planned Parenthood, Wife Was A Donor
GOP Fundraising Email Asks Supporters To “Knock Out” Obama
Romney Comes Up Limp In Nevada
Obama Opens Lead On Romney In New Poll
Latest Entries
Why Do Liberals Support Drone Strikes?
Weekly Standard Rolls Out The Iraq Argument For Iran
Equal Polarization, My Ass
Some Crazy Stuff That Happened In World War II
Maryland Republican Campaign Funds Used To Defend Voter Suppression
The Obama Jobs Record In One Graph
Martin O’Malley All In For Marriage Equality
Newt Gingrich, Filled With More Excrement Than Your Average Politician
New Year, Powerline Still Stupid
Thanks Again
Meta
Blogroll
Disclaimer
The views on this site are mine and mine alone, and do not reflect the views of my employer, Media Matters for America
© 2000-2011 Oliver Willis
Feh. That “One man, one vote” notion is so 1999.
Oh sure, we had big protests in Florida about the disputed (and fraudulent) results of a presidential election
Hahaha….man. You guys will never get over being beat.
COUNT THE VOTES! (Again and again and again and again and again….how long? UNTIL WE GET THE RESULTS WE WANT!!!)
Mexico is no different. The left loses and it HAS to be because somebody stole it.
Shut. The. Fuck. Up.
As far as 2000 goes, counting the votes ONCE would be nice.
2004 was essentially legit, but there’s still a lot of suspicious bollocks around Ohio which you’d care deeply about if it went the opposite way. Plus the very existence of Diebold voting machines is total bullshit.
Don’t act like a smug dick just because you got away with it. 2000 was stolen and you know it.
Nimrod, the sad thing is he knows it, but doesn’t care, because his “team” won. It’s ok to them that thousands of African-Americans were disenfranchised. It’s ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts.
I know. That’s why I get so angry at people acting all smug and ah-ha-you’re-only-bitter-cause-you-lost about the fact that George Bush was originally elected by a judicial coup d’etat.
Go. Fuck. Yourself.
Babies. All of you.
It’s ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts.
Well maybe if the Democrats in those counties that were in charge of the process weren’t such incompetent twits, there wouldn’t have been such problems.
Anybody that sits around and talks about “stolen elections”, “coup d’etat”, “fraudulent results” is a nothing but a goddamned crybaby.
It’s as simple as that.
Grow up already.
As for 2004, Kerry is blubbering in some letter about Ohio.
You guys lost and you lost fair and square. Stop fucking crying about it already.
Oooh, crazy jay is angry! Maybe he should be angry that he has no way to prove that his vote was recorded, but no, it’s all the big bad librul’s fault!!!
You would think having an accurate vote count and allowing all citizens to vote equally would be a non-partisan issue, but…..
It’s ok that broken machines were sent to typically Democratic precincts.
Well maybe if the Democrats in those counties that were in charge of the process weren’t such incompetent twits, there wouldn’t have been such problems.
Um, the broken machines were sent by the Republican Sec of State. Is someone an “incompetent twit” if they can’t make an broken machine work? If you dispute that account then say so, but by bring up a distracting counter-point you show that really don’t care about anything else but the political party you think is on your side winning. Certainly not Democracy, and certainly not America.
There are plenty of countries that don’t have a fair vote you can move to. Leave American to those who love it.
We lost fair and square in 2004, despite the odd what-Condoleeza-Rice-would-call-teething-problems, but not in 2000. And admit it or not, you know that perfectly well, unless you have the memory of a retarded goldfish. Whatever you say, it means nothing, because I know that you could not look me in the eye and tell me that election wasn’t stolen. And you could not look me in the eye and claim you’d have precisely the same opinion if the events of 2000 had applied to Gore instead of Bush.
If 2000 was stolen, doesn’t logic dictate that 2004 was stolen as well? Certainly, if Bush ran again in ’04 not as an incumbant but as a once defeated candidate, the results would have been completely different.
I’m referring to the butterfly effect. And, Jay, talk about sore losing crybabies. My God, look what the right did to Clinton just because he won. Man! Talk about sore losers.
Well, apart from the fact that the incumbent in 2004 actually lost the previous election, it was legit, in that Bush actually won fair and square, which was immensely depressing.
Maybe not. After 9/11, the Republicans would have sought a candidate with outstanding war credentials, like McCain. I doubt they would have propped up a candidate with a dubious national guard record.
Jay is typical right wing, he doesn’t care that the ‘wrong’ people aren’t allowed to vote. Just like he doesn’t care that the ‘wrong’ people’s civil rights are thrown out so he can get over his lack of bladder control.