Myths, Busted

1:31 pm EST August 27th, 2006 | Politics | 4 Comments

The media keeps saying that Democrats are losers in the south no matter what, but yet Hillary Clinton and Wes Clark outpoll sitting Republican Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee — in Arkansas, in a presidential matchup. Who to believe? The facts or the spin. You decide. (via)

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

4 Responses to “Myths, Busted”

  1. WhiteWhale says:

    Go figure:0 My brother in law really thinks that Republicans will vote for anyone as long as there is an (R) but believes Newt Gingrich is somehow better than Huckabee. As I have mentioned MANY times to Oliver(not a Clark believer), Wes Clark is a candidate that can win ANYWHERE and has actual solutions to our problem. Knowing the Democrats, they will go for a face (Clinton) and won’t do ANYTHING to rock the boat. At least our next president will be a step up from mental retarted, unless George “that noose is for a western scene” Allen gets elected, in which case I will move to Antartica.

  2. Dugger says:

    WW,

    Your support for Gen Clark is really admirable. In a time when nobody else knows he’s there, you are unwavering. BTW, do you drive an AMC Pacer, read Look magazine and sip YooHoo?

  3. WhiteWhale says:

    Dugger,
    Its all very amusing but for someone who normally goes above the fray, your comment shows your uninformed and did not read Oliver’s link. Your generalization falls short: Honda Accord, I read the Economist and Guitar World and I couldn’t drink YooHoo because I am lactose intolerant:(. Rather than look for ANOTHER figure-head I am too worried about supporting a substantive candidate. Since we are on generalizations I am guessing(if you are in Atlanta, as I am) that you drive a Lexus or Land Rover, you read the National Review, listen to Boortz and sip chai lattes.(Conservatives are just a fru-fru in ATL)

  4. Roche says:

    Honestly, Clark would probably do pretty well in the South–in Alabama, at least, they think enough of him to have named a street after him.

    Plus, he can’t really be easily skewered as “weak on defense” since he’s a retired general, former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, and first in his class at West Point.

    As to his stance on the issues, I don’t know; however, I know that he is probably not weak in the same way as other candidates may be.