<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is Why&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:02:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay C</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-40001</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-40001</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The home ownership factoid is essentially meaningless since  more people have own homes  is something that s been true for every year since the end of WWII.&lt;/i&gt;

If the economy were as horrible as Oliver and Frame claim it is, home ownership would not go up. Oh, unless of course it&#039;s nothing but us rich Republicans buying more of our mansions.

&lt;i&gt;WRT unemployment and GDP, Jay Caruso holds one quarter s number aloft as if this is some great feat.&lt;/i&gt;

I cited one quarter. But it&#039;s been part of a long term trend dipshit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The home ownership factoid is essentially meaningless since  more people have own homes  is something that s been true for every year since the end of WWII.</i></p>
<p>If the economy were as horrible as Oliver and Frame claim it is, home ownership would not go up. Oh, unless of course it&#8217;s nothing but us rich Republicans buying more of our mansions.</p>
<p><i>WRT unemployment and GDP, Jay Caruso holds one quarter s number aloft as if this is some great feat.</i></p>
<p>I cited one quarter. But it&#8217;s been part of a long term trend dipshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-40000</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-40000</guid>
		<description>If they should go from bad spenders to non-spenders, 66% of our economy disappears.
If? If what?
People who go bankrupt don&#039;t even lose their homes or their cars. Where have you been?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they should go from bad spenders to non-spenders, 66% of our economy disappears.<br />
If? If what?<br />
People who go bankrupt don&#8217;t even lose their homes or their cars. Where have you been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay C</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39999</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39999</guid>
		<description>Frame, your foreclosure information doesn&#039;t say who is being foreclosed on. Well, since I have some insight into that, let me let you in on a little secret: The bulk of it are people who bought investment property hoping to &quot;flip it&quot; quickly and got stuck because they got into the game too late.

&lt;i&gt;Jay C: yet people clearly do not have the confidence in this income-disparity fueling economy as they did in Clinton s economy where the rich got richer but so did the middle class. And we didn t have a decreasing deficit, we had a surplus.&lt;/i&gt;

Oliver, people are tying high gas prices to &quot;the economy&quot; and as such, it reflects in the poll numbers. But it hasn&#039;t stopped people from driving their cars. The vacation season this summer is one of the busiest on record. If the economy was doing so poorly, people wouldn&#039;t be doing what they are doing.

The economy is doing good. Deal with already. I realize that the left is happier when things are bad, but you&#039;ll have to live a good economy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frame, your foreclosure information doesn&#8217;t say who is being foreclosed on. Well, since I have some insight into that, let me let you in on a little secret: The bulk of it are people who bought investment property hoping to &#8220;flip it&#8221; quickly and got stuck because they got into the game too late.</p>
<p><i>Jay C: yet people clearly do not have the confidence in this income-disparity fueling economy as they did in Clinton s economy where the rich got richer but so did the middle class. And we didn t have a decreasing deficit, we had a surplus.</i></p>
<p>Oliver, people are tying high gas prices to &#8220;the economy&#8221; and as such, it reflects in the poll numbers. But it hasn&#8217;t stopped people from driving their cars. The vacation season this summer is one of the busiest on record. If the economy was doing so poorly, people wouldn&#8217;t be doing what they are doing.</p>
<p>The economy is doing good. Deal with already. I realize that the left is happier when things are bad, but you&#8217;ll have to live a good economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z adura</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39998</link>
		<dc:creator>z adura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39998</guid>
		<description>Frank, bad spenders they may be, but they are your countrymen.  If they should go from bad spenders to non-spenders, 66% of our economy disappears.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, bad spenders they may be, but they are your countrymen.  If they should go from bad spenders to non-spenders, 66% of our economy disappears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jadegold</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39997</link>
		<dc:creator>Jadegold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39997</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Unemployment is at 4.6 percent. GDP grew at a rate of 5.6 percent for the first quarter of this year. Hourly compensation is up. Productivity is up. More people own homes now than ever before &lt;/i&gt;

The home ownership factoid is essentially meaningless since &#039;more people have own homes&#039; is something that&#039;s been true for every year since the end of WWII.

WRT unemployment and GDP, Jay Caruso holds one quarter&#039;s number aloft as if this is some great feat.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Unemployment is at 4.6 percent. GDP grew at a rate of 5.6 percent for the first quarter of this year. Hourly compensation is up. Productivity is up. More people own homes now than ever before </i></p>
<p>The home ownership factoid is essentially meaningless since &#8216;more people have own homes&#8217; is something that&#8217;s been true for every year since the end of WWII.</p>
<p>WRT unemployment and GDP, Jay Caruso holds one quarter&#8217;s number aloft as if this is some great feat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39996</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39996</guid>
		<description>When bad things happen to bad spenders, by Paul Malcolm.

I&#039;m sure if the bank passed the losses onto the depositors in the form of higher fees or reduced interest, that would help the economy, right, frame?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When bad things happen to bad spenders, by Paul Malcolm.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure if the bank passed the losses onto the depositors in the form of higher fees or reduced interest, that would help the economy, right, frame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39995</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39995</guid>
		<description>Oh. My. Goodness!  How can you read that article and MISS THE FIRST SENTENCE?!??!!

&lt;blockquote&gt;The media love Valerie Plame Wilson.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This was a TPM affiliate (someone who&#039;s pre-disposed to be looking for right-wing bias).  And here they are saying that VPW and JW were literally basking in the adoring glow of fawning coverage.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. My. Goodness!  How can you read that article and MISS THE FIRST SENTENCE?!??!!</p>
<blockquote><p>The media love Valerie Plame Wilson.</p></blockquote>
<p>This was a TPM affiliate (someone who&#8217;s pre-disposed to be looking for right-wing bias).  And here they are saying that VPW and JW were literally basking in the adoring glow of fawning coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_D</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39994</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39994</guid>
		<description>And surely you don&#039;t expect us to believe that anything in the Clinton administration &quot;spoke for itself.&quot;

He had that  War Room going 24/7, 365 for 8 years...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And surely you don&#8217;t expect us to believe that anything in the Clinton administration &#8220;spoke for itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>He had that  War Room going 24/7, 365 for 8 years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39993</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39993</guid>
		<description>And foreclosures are on the rise! Whoopee! Let&#039;s shake those dead beats out the market!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Per a six-month analysis of U.S. foreclosure data, new foreclosures rose from 23,982 in January to 26,972 in March, and have remained at a high level, ending the first half of the year with 27,064 new foreclosures in May and 26,802 in June.

Active foreclosure inventory levels have been declining during the same time span, with available inventory dropping from 95,073 in January to 89,352 in June. Despite higher new foreclosure rates in the first half of 2006 compared to last year, high demand for foreclosed homes has kept inventory in check.

Real Estate experts say a &quot;major market correction&quot; has contributed to a nationwide increase of almost 20 percent in active foreclosures.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_89017.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_89017.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_89017.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And foreclosures are on the rise! Whoopee! Let&#8217;s shake those dead beats out the market!</p>
<blockquote><p>Per a six-month analysis of U.S. foreclosure data, new foreclosures rose from 23,982 in January to 26,972 in March, and have remained at a high level, ending the first half of the year with 27,064 new foreclosures in May and 26,802 in June.</p>
<p>Active foreclosure inventory levels have been declining during the same time span, with available inventory dropping from 95,073 in January to 89,352 in June. Despite higher new foreclosure rates in the first half of 2006 compared to last year, high demand for foreclosed homes has kept inventory in check.</p>
<p>Real Estate experts say a &#8220;major market correction&#8221; has contributed to a nationwide increase of almost 20 percent in active foreclosures.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_89017.asp" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_89017.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_89017.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rounds77</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39992</link>
		<dc:creator>Rounds77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39992</guid>
		<description>Jay C., I hate to rain on your Pollyanna parade but:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060200121.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060200121.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060200121.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Lower budget deficit?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4045907.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4045907.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4045907.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

You think it&#039;s great now? Wait until future generations have to pay for Bush&#039;s spending spree.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay C., I hate to rain on your Pollyanna parade but:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060200121.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060200121.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060200121.html</a></p>
<p>Lower budget deficit?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4045907.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4045907.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4045907.html</a></p>
<p>You think it&#8217;s great now? Wait until future generations have to pay for Bush&#8217;s spending spree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39991</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39991</guid>
		<description>Or....

Under President Clinton, the media went out of their way to triumphantly proclaim &quot;The Clinton Miracle&quot;.  Now, with similar results, the MSM says .... nothing.  We wouldn&#039;t have to do the MSM&#039;s job if they would.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or&#8230;.</p>
<p>Under President Clinton, the media went out of their way to triumphantly proclaim &#8220;The Clinton Miracle&#8221;.  Now, with similar results, the MSM says &#8230;. nothing.  We wouldn&#8217;t have to do the MSM&#8217;s job if they would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39990</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39990</guid>
		<description>PS.  Need proof on which team the MSM roots for?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001137.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This should answer your question&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS.  Need proof on which team the MSM roots for?  <a href="http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001137.php" rel="nofollow">This should answer your question</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39989</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39989</guid>
		<description>Savefarris: because they covered a press conference? I happen to remember the MSM all over every crackpot anti-Clinton press conference in existence.

Jay C: yet people clearly do not have the confidence in this income-disparity fueling economy as they did in Clinton&#039;s economy where the rich got richer but so did the middle class. And we didn&#039;t have a decreasing deficit, we had a surplus.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Savefarris: because they covered a press conference? I happen to remember the MSM all over every crackpot anti-Clinton press conference in existence.</p>
<p>Jay C: yet people clearly do not have the confidence in this income-disparity fueling economy as they did in Clinton&#8217;s economy where the rich got richer but so did the middle class. And we didn&#8217;t have a decreasing deficit, we had a surplus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay C</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/07/14/this-is-why/#comment-39988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2392#comment-39988</guid>
		<description>Yes and we know Paul Krugman is an unbiased source that wouldn&#039;t twist numbers around that he could call &#039;true&#039; but would still fit his agenda.

Unemployment is at 4.6 percent. GDP grew at a rate of 5.6 percent for the first quarter of this year. Hourly compensation is up. Productivity is up. More people own homes now than ever before (I close on my first home next month!). Consumer spending continues to increase. We have a decreasing budget deficit, and lower tax rates.

But of course, only the super-rich can tell.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and we know Paul Krugman is an unbiased source that wouldn&#8217;t twist numbers around that he could call &#8216;true&#8217; but would still fit his agenda.</p>
<p>Unemployment is at 4.6 percent. GDP grew at a rate of 5.6 percent for the first quarter of this year. Hourly compensation is up. Productivity is up. More people own homes now than ever before (I close on my first home next month!). Consumer spending continues to increase. We have a decreasing budget deficit, and lower tax rates.</p>
<p>But of course, only the super-rich can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
