I understand Brent Bozell knows.
Media Research Center founder and president L. Brent Bozell III wrote that The New York Times — in the articles it publishes and through its sponsorship of events such as the 2006 Gay Games — is “rooting for the homosexual revolution” and “actively spread[ing] the gay gospel.”
Because God knows there’s no way for heterosexuals to pass on diseases to each other through risky sexual behavior.
Or what happened in Massachusetts, which is….. nothing!
Death. Plague. Pestillance. Basically the worst parts of the Bible.
Where do you think the word Sodomy came from?
What will happen in the “homosexual revolution” that conservatives fear so? Do they see legions of gay men breaking into their homes and forcing them to engage in same-sex copulation? Do they see lesbians throwing molotov cocktails into the grocery stores and spraying rainbows on everything? They tear down the Lincoln Memorial and replace it with a shrine to Judy Garland? Elton John on the radio, all day every day? Queer Eye, Will & Grace, and The L Word marathons on every channel?
And why haven’t LaHaye and Jenkins already started writing the books about this apocalyptic heterosexual nightmare?
Death. Plague. Pestillance. Basically the worst parts of the Bible.
Are you trying to quote Ghostbusters? If not, may you member shrivel like a leaf when the homosexual revolutionaires zap you with their gay ray gun (which is, of course, besotted with rhinestones and shoots a rainbow colored ray)
“Death. Plague. Pestillance. Basically the worst parts of the Bible.”
You believe this? Really?
Hope you’re not having oral sex with anyone, Farris, cause that’s sodomy too, married or not. Hope you don’t turn into a pillar of salt!
Very funny, Farris. But I know better than to respond seriously to such obvious satire.
God also told us to love one another. Did you ever think that the myriad of differences between us–race, creed, sexual orientation–is just His way of testing you?
BD, I wouldn’t expect too much compassion from Farris. It looks like he never made it out of Revelations and Leviticus.
BD: For that matter, Jesus also said that it is easier for a camel to pass through a needle’s eye than for a rich man to enter Heaven.
” … it is easier for a camel to pass through a needle s eye than for a rich man to enter Heaven.”
Bill Bennett will take that bet!
This is an interesting article that postulates Jesus and Paul had a “special” relationship. How do you think that would play?
..or the country gets a fabulous makeover.
I’ll take the bet that neither one of you knows the meaning of that reference.
You do know that it has nothing to do with it being impossible for rich people to go to Heaven
Please show me where Paul was mentioned in the article. I must have missed it. Since Paul was not alive until Jesus died, their relationship would have been very special, indeed.
Also, a note of caution about ethnocentrism with regard to the portrayal of friends and mentors in medieval and renaissance paintings.
Even the idea of men and women being in love was somewhat alien in those days.
Guilhem IX Count of Poitiers and Duke of Aquitaine (1071- 1127)
Joyous in love, I make my aim
Joyous in love, I make my aim
forever deeper in Joy to be.
The perfect Joy’s the goal for me:
so the most perfect lady I claim.
I’ve caught her eyes. All must exclaim:
the loveliest heard or seen is she.
You know I’d never base my fame
on brags. If ever we’re to see
a flowering Joy, this Joy, burst free,
should bear such fruit no man can name,
lifting among the others a flame
that brightens in obscurity.
http://www.sogang.ac.kr/~anthony/Love.htm
It’s almost like you don’t know anything Frank.
“Even the idea of men and women being in love was somewhat alien in those days.”
What? Are you smoking crack again, Frank?
I’m sorry, not Paul. St. John the favored apostle.
Mea culpa.
“Even the idea of men and women being in love was somewhat alien in those days.”
Perhaps, Frank, (though you would, of course, have to cite something to support that) but the idea of a man and a man being in love was not. I would be so bold to say that if it weren’t for homosexuals, the Renaissance probably would not have happened.
Farris, go back to Wikipedia and look at the origin of the word bigot.
What Are The Lyrics To The Gay Gospel?
“Somewhere over the Rainbow” by Judy Garland?
“I will Survive” gloria Gaynor?
“I’m Still Standing” Elton John?
Frank_D Jul 14th, 2006 at 2:22 pm
I ll take the bet that neither one of you knows the meaning of that reference. You do know that it has nothing to do with it being impossible for rich people to go to Heaven
Frank, why is it that, so often, your first impulse is to challenge other commenters about their knowledge … like you’re the self imposed fountain of all knowledge …?