Comments on: Against Unilateral Disarmament

By: (: Tom :)

(: Tom :) — Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:07:09 +0000

That post might have been hateful, were it untrue.

Said the man who just posted unfounded allegations, and outright lies, about a former president of the United States.

Got any proof of your wild allegations? I don’t seem to recall where Clinton was convicted of rape. The crimes of sexual predator, serial groper, and harasser of women fall under which statutes again? And Clinton was convicted of them when?

Hateful speech is an opinion-based judgement, not a factual one (and, yes, I think you are being extremely hateful when you spread unfounded lies like this). I was calling you on your lies, and your breaking of one of the commandments, in this comment thread.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:07:41 +0000

I don’t recall mentioning San Francisco…

By: z adura

z adura — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:07:44 +0000

Frank, I know not a single person in liberal San Francisco who is divorced or having kids out of wedlock, but I know many, many such situations in my ancestral home of conservative Oklahoma. I am sure this is totally anecdotal but it’s the truth.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:07:34 +0000

That post might have been hateful, were it untrue.

By: (: Tom :)

(: Tom :) — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:04 +0000

I m sure you ll be glad to direct me to those hateful posts, and instruct me in which Catholic dogma you find illuminated my path to Purgatory

I know that Clinton was a rapist, a sexual predator, a groper, and a harasser of women

Bearing false witness makes teh Jeebus cry.

By: buma

buma — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:07:00 +0000

One of the best lines from the whole Dipstick Limpbaugh episode is when his physician stated that the Viagra prescription was in the doctor’s name to ensure PRIVACY! That sure worked.
Wonder how long Rush will wait before he launches into another rant about how liberals are against family values. Until he’s married to wife four?

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:07:58 +0000

What happened to saving sex for marriage?
As opposed to the liberal ethic that having children out of wedlock is marvelous.
Ask the woman who has one.

By: Bushwacked

Bushwacked — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:07:31 +0000

Face it, Rush pulled a boner.
The prescription (LOL) is usually taken because of the inability get one or sustain it long enough.

By: doug r

doug r — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 07:07:53 +0000

What does an unmarried man need with Viagra? What happened to saving sex for marriage?
Face it, Rush pulled a boner.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 02:07:10 +0000

Get a sense of humor, Bluto frameone…

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:07:27 +0000

I’ll continue the wordplay, frame: If you had faith in me, you wouldn’t be suffering.
Sundown: You’re probably feeling pretty clever,eh?
Of course, you ignored the statement that I would set myself up. So forgive me if I am not surprised by your feeble attempt at witty repartee.
So I take it you think President Bush (a Methodist) isn t a real Christian?
You are wrong. Shall I explain why, or would you rather bathe in the glory of your ignorance? As I mentioned above, liberals don’t know jack about Christianity.

Your hateful posts on this message board are giving you more purgatory time.
I’m sure you’ll be glad to direct me to those hateful posts, and instruct me in which Catholic dogma you find illuminated my path to Purgatory (we Catholics think of it as a real place, so we spell it with a capital letter — unlike you hellbound heathen lefties*).

* Just kidding. Relax.

By: Sundown

Sundown — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:07:22 +0000

Ok, now I see the agenda. “Traditional Christianity” only refers to Roman Catholicism, eh??

So I take it you think President Bush (a Methodist) isn’t a real Christian?

By: Sundown

Sundown — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:07:09 +0000

If anything, by the way, your hateful posts on this message board are giving you more purgatory time.

By: frameone

frameone — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:07:04 +0000

“If you had faith in me, you wouldn t be suffering.”

And you’ve done what to earn anyone’s faith?

By: frameone

frameone — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:07:14 +0000

“One thing I learned at St. Gabriel s Elementary and Salesian HS is that if I suffer for my faith, it cuts down on my Purgatory.”

Now explain to us why we have to suffer for your faith.

By: Frank_D

Frank_D — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:07:11 +0000

Let’s just say I’m a Right – to – Lifer.
Then again, as I’ve said in the past, you can never go wrong knocking Catholics.
So I’ll set myself up – I’m a Roman Catholic who’s a strong believer, just not real big on the Sunday Church.
Go ahead and flog away, boys!
One thing I learned at St. Gabriel’s Elementary and Salesian HS is that if I suffer for my faith, it cuts down on my Purgatory.
Do a good job, guys, and I can get time off for seeing two free movies yesterday.

By: Sundown

Sundown — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:07:52 +0000

Frank,

What denomination do you belong to?

By: Zython

Zython — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:07:58 +0000

You can have terrorists without terror, if they are either disarmed, locked up, or dead.
Better? I noticed you didn t disagree.

I don’t disagree. The terrorists need to be stopped, but my arguement is that’s only half the battle.

The other people you mentioned are not the TERRORISTS we are fighting. Neither Yigal Amir, nor the IRA,bombed the WTC twice, the USS Cole, etc., etc.

Terror : Violence committed or threatened by a group to intimidate or coerce a population, as for military or political purposes.
Stuff done by terrorists.

A fair definition.

Here s hoping that when they start, they believe you re a homosexual.

Typical ultra-conservative tactic. You can’t argue against me effectively, so you have to resort to threatening me. Lovely.

I believe Timothy McVeigh is dead, and, thus, much less of a threat to the American way of life than,say, you.
The other people you mentioned are not the TERRORISTS we are fighting. Neither Yigal Amir, nor the IRA,bombed the WTC twice, the USS Cole, etc., etc.

What on earth does that have to do with the point I responed to earlier? You said all terrorists were Muslims, and I gave you examples otherwise.

I dare you to answer.

I don’t respond to dares.

Actually, I m not afraid they re under my bed. I m afraid that one day, they ll be under your bed, and the fact that you have never cared will mean nothing when they blow up, not you (you re not afraid, remember?), but your neighbors.

I will grant you that you are truly concerned about the threat of another terrorist attack, and that is commendable. However, I choose not to let fear rule over my judgement. I’m not going to be persuaded by people telling me that being critical of our government “emboldens our enemies”. That is how I choose to live.

As for drpedro, I will only say, in response to this:

LOL

OMGWTFBBQ!

Seriously, you made no effort to refute the points I made, so why should I?

By: Zython

Zython — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:07:47 +0000

The other people you mentioned are not the TERRORISTS we are fighting. Neither Yigal Amir, nor the IRA,bombed the WTC twice, the USS Cole, etc., etc.

Ignore the first time that appears. (They should really let you edit posts here)

By: frameone

frameone — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:07:19 +0000

“If a court martial is good enough justice for our military, then a military tribunal is good enough for accused terrorists, and that is what I recommended.”

There you go again. Arbitrarily deciding that some people deserve less justice than others. On what legal grounds are you asserting this unequal, different treatment? Enlighten me.