<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If He Only Applied That Theory Universally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/</link>
	<description>Like Kryptonite To Stupid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:34:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Powerline - Still Clueless » Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38110</link>
		<dc:creator>Powerline - Still Clueless » Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38110</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier this week when I took a swipe at one of the Powerline boys, some of you complained that I was just lashing out at them. But it s beyond absurd that the mainstream press treats a bunch of yahoos who are wrong on everything like a bunch of acceptable figures to be listened to. Case in point: Powerline claims that An Inconvenient Truth has lost steam, when in fact its box office take has increased every week of its release. [...]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier this week when I took a swipe at one of the Powerline boys, some of you complained that I was just lashing out at them. But it s beyond absurd that the mainstream press treats a bunch of yahoos who are wrong on everything like a bunch of acceptable figures to be listened to. Case in point: Powerline claims that An Inconvenient Truth has lost steam, when in fact its box office take has increased every week of its release. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38109</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38109</guid>
		<description>JWG,

The basic premise of Mirengoff&#039;s analogy was wrong. Boys and girls test scores are both rising but girls have outstripped boys in performance. If the situation were reversed, Mirengoff contends, liberals would complain louder. Just like, he adds, when they complain about income disparity even though all incomes are rising. But all incomes are not rising, JWG. The analogy is false because the premise on which it is based -- all incomes are rising -- is not true. Hence, liberals complain about income disparity because THERE IS A DISPARITY IN INCOMES and A DISPARITY IN THE RISE OF INCOMES.It just another instance of how conservative idiots try to pass off misinformation as conventional, accpeted wisdom. Here Mirengoff reaches for a twofer: Pass off misinformation as true, smear liberals in general for denying the facts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JWG,</p>
<p>The basic premise of Mirengoff&#8217;s analogy was wrong. Boys and girls test scores are both rising but girls have outstripped boys in performance. If the situation were reversed, Mirengoff contends, liberals would complain louder. Just like, he adds, when they complain about income disparity even though all incomes are rising. But all incomes are not rising, JWG. The analogy is false because the premise on which it is based &#8212; all incomes are rising &#8212; is not true. Hence, liberals complain about income disparity because THERE IS A DISPARITY IN INCOMES and A DISPARITY IN THE RISE OF INCOMES.It just another instance of how conservative idiots try to pass off misinformation as conventional, accpeted wisdom. Here Mirengoff reaches for a twofer: Pass off misinformation as true, smear liberals in general for denying the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrivatePyle</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38108</link>
		<dc:creator>PrivatePyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38108</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Mirengoff and the powerliners regularly opine with authority on things they don t remotely understand.&quot;

Isn&#039;t that delicious...and that&#039;s different from you in what way...?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Mirengoff and the powerliners regularly opine with authority on things they don t remotely understand.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that delicious&#8230;and that&#8217;s different from you in what way&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38107</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38107</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wow, you really missed the point of the statement. He wasn t making an economic point. As you like to say&amp; idiot.&quot;

Nothing like a conservative to use a false premise to justify an overgeneralization. Nothing like a conservative troll to back it all the way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wow, you really missed the point of the statement. He wasn t making an economic point. As you like to say&#038; idiot.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nothing like a conservative to use a false premise to justify an overgeneralization. Nothing like a conservative troll to back it all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38106</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38106</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s somewhere between 40-50%, myself. Now let&#039;s have two talking heads on Hardball go back and forth about it for a couple of days! That&#039;s the GOP media strategy in a nutshell.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s somewhere between 40-50%, myself. Now let&#8217;s have two talking heads on Hardball go back and forth about it for a couple of days! That&#8217;s the GOP media strategy in a nutshell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38105</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38105</guid>
		<description>Tonight on Hardball:  Are global warming deniers ignorant, liars, or just stupid?  Let&#039;s debate!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight on Hardball:  Are global warming deniers ignorant, liars, or just stupid?  Let&#8217;s debate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38104</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38104</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Please tell me which percentage of conservatives wish we had a fascist government:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

0%.  You might find an odd libertarian or two who lean that way, but not conservatives.

&lt;blockquote&gt;please tell me how many liberal journalists you would like to see hanged.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

0%.  I&#039;m certainly in favor of them all being fired in disgrace (i.e. the Dan Rather Treatment).  But hanged?  Naw.  They&#039;ll just become martyrs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Please tell me which percentage of conservatives wish we had a fascist government:</p></blockquote>
<p>0%.  You might find an odd libertarian or two who lean that way, but not conservatives.</p>
<blockquote><p>please tell me how many liberal journalists you would like to see hanged.</p></blockquote>
<p>0%.  I&#8217;m certainly in favor of them all being fired in disgrace (i.e. the Dan Rather Treatment).  But hanged?  Naw.  They&#8217;ll just become martyrs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: August J. Pollak - xoverboard.com</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38102</link>
		<dc:creator>August J. Pollak - xoverboard.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38102</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Klein&#039;s Law : it&#039;s official...&lt;/strong&gt;

Powerline reports that ticket sales for An Inconvenient Truth have &quot;plummeted.&quot; By &quot;plummeted,&quot; they mean increased every week since the movie opened. Oliver reminded us of something Ezra mentioned a while back, and I think it&#039;s official now. Join...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Klein&#8217;s Law : it&#8217;s official&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Powerline reports that ticket sales for An Inconvenient Truth have &#8220;plummeted.&#8221; By &#8220;plummeted,&#8221; they mean increased every week since the movie opened. Oliver reminded us of something Ezra mentioned a while back, and I think it&#8217;s official now. Join&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38103</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38103</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nothing like a...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
liberal to use an argument one day to bolster his position and then use the exact opposite argument the next day to bolster the same position.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nothing like a&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>liberal to use an argument one day to bolster his position and then use the exact opposite argument the next day to bolster the same position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomY</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38101</link>
		<dc:creator>TomY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38101</guid>
		<description>Please tell me which percentage of conservatives wish we had a fascist government: 10%, 50% or 75%. Also, please tell me how many liberal journalists you would like to see hanged. It&#039;s all &quot;debateable,&quot; right?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me which percentage of conservatives wish we had a fascist government: 10%, 50% or 75%. Also, please tell me how many liberal journalists you would like to see hanged. It&#8217;s all &#8220;debateable,&#8221; right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38100</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38100</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In other words, feel free to ignore them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You&#039;re the one who is ignoring the obvious: Since there&#039;s &quot;no debate&quot; please tell me what proportion of global warming is due to man (1%, 10% 50? 75%, or what?).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In other words, feel free to ignore them.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re the one who is ignoring the obvious: Since there&#8217;s &#8220;no debate&#8221; please tell me what proportion of global warming is due to man (1%, 10% 50? 75%, or what?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38099</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38099</guid>
		<description>Wow, you really missed the point of the statement. He wasn&#039;t making an economic point. As you like to say...idiot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you really missed the point of the statement. He wasn&#8217;t making an economic point. As you like to say&#8230;idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frameone</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38098</link>
		<dc:creator>frameone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 03:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38098</guid>
		<description>The full, full quote:

&quot;I lack the expertise to weigh in on this issue except to say that if the scores of girls were increasing but not as fast as the scores of boys, I doubt that the Post and the educational think tanks would take so sanguine a view. &lt;b&gt;Certainly, when the topic is income disparity, it is no answer to tell a liberal that all incomes have been rising.&lt;/b&gt;&quot;

Ya, the guy&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&amp;sid=axM1KWKMCyxs&amp;refer=us&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;genius&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;June 20 (Bloomberg) -- Americans&#039; wage gains are evaporating as inflation accelerates, helping explain why confidence in the economy isn&#039;t soaring along with job growth.

Weekly wages adjusted for inflation fell 0.7 percent last month and are down 0.2 percent over the past year, according to a report last week by the Labor Department. Pay has been flat or declined in more than half of the 65 months since January 2001, when President George W. Bush took office.

...

Adjusted for inflation, the median income for the top 10 percent of U.S. households rose 2.3 percent between 2001 and 2004, covering much of Bush&#039;s first term in office, according to the Federal Reserve&#039;s Survey of Consumer Finances, issued in February. For the other 90 percent of households -- which earned less than $184,800 in 2004 -- the median fell 0.5 percent over the same period. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full, full quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;I lack the expertise to weigh in on this issue except to say that if the scores of girls were increasing but not as fast as the scores of boys, I doubt that the Post and the educational think tanks would take so sanguine a view. <b>Certainly, when the topic is income disparity, it is no answer to tell a liberal that all incomes have been rising.</b>&#8221;</p>
<p>Ya, the guy&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&#038;sid=axM1KWKMCyxs&#038;refer=us" rel="nofollow">genius</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>June 20 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Americans&#8217; wage gains are evaporating as inflation accelerates, helping explain why confidence in the economy isn&#8217;t soaring along with job growth.</p>
<p>Weekly wages adjusted for inflation fell 0.7 percent last month and are down 0.2 percent over the past year, according to a report last week by the Labor Department. Pay has been flat or declined in more than half of the 65 months since January 2001, when President George W. Bush took office.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Adjusted for inflation, the median income for the top 10 percent of U.S. households rose 2.3 percent between 2001 and 2004, covering much of Bush&#8217;s first term in office, according to the Federal Reserve&#8217;s Survey of Consumer Finances, issued in February. For the other 90 percent of households &#8212; which earned less than $184,800 in 2004 &#8212; the median fell 0.5 percent over the same period. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill L.</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38097</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 03:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38097</guid>
		<description>Once again, deflect and redirect.  Whatta strategy.  Make it about Oliver.  Powerline blowhards, the ones picked by Time as &quot;blog of the year,&quot; pontificate regularly on subjects for which they not only have no expertise, but on which they have opinions they cannot justify beyond &quot;because I say so...&quot;  A lot of the weight Powerline carries comes from the fact that it was founded by three lawyers, a fact which seems to buy them a lot of undeserved credibility on a broad range of issues.  It is also the case that Powerline is quoted as a source by other blogs who are then quoted by Powerline.  It&#039;s part of that wonderous right-wing circle jerk/echo chamber that spreads and reinforces GOP propaganda while simultaneously giving the impression that certain conservative positions are better supported than they are.
-
I don&#039;t understand the question on Global Warming.  Is JWG asking for metric tons of CO2, a gross percentage, or something like &quot;enough to make life on this planet miserable over the next century?&quot;  If there is one issue that screams &quot;your EEG is flatlining&quot; to me, it&#039;s Global Warming.  What&#039;s the downside of cleaner air, drastically reduced oil dependence (maybe opponents aren&#039;t serious about fighting terrorism), new renewable energy industries, healthier oceans (and healthier fish populations, naturally), reduced extractive mining operations (no more blowing the tops off mountains and destroying the local water supply with heavy metal contaminants)?  Do we really need to wait to find out who is to blame to do anything?  I just don&#039;t see how trying to avert a potential global catastrophe registers with some as &quot;moonbat conspiracy to ruin the American way of life.&quot;   Unless you are a kool-aid guzzling lump who feels entitled to a &quot;way of life&quot; that apparently entails being a grotesque resource hog with an over developed sense of entitlement.  That goes without saying, though.
-
I&#039;m no expert, but...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclimate.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earth.columbia.edu/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;guys&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;are.&lt;/a&gt;

If you are a Powerline fan, these blue letters are called &quot;links,&quot; and they go to other pages on the &quot;internet&quot; where you can learn more about a subject, in this case, Global Warming, from &quot;experts&quot; who actually have &quot;degrees&quot; in the subject they are discussing.

In other words, feel free to ignore them.

As usual.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, deflect and redirect.  Whatta strategy.  Make it about Oliver.  Powerline blowhards, the ones picked by Time as &#8220;blog of the year,&#8221; pontificate regularly on subjects for which they not only have no expertise, but on which they have opinions they cannot justify beyond &#8220;because I say so&#8230;&#8221;  A lot of the weight Powerline carries comes from the fact that it was founded by three lawyers, a fact which seems to buy them a lot of undeserved credibility on a broad range of issues.  It is also the case that Powerline is quoted as a source by other blogs who are then quoted by Powerline.  It&#8217;s part of that wonderous right-wing circle jerk/echo chamber that spreads and reinforces GOP propaganda while simultaneously giving the impression that certain conservative positions are better supported than they are.<br />
-<br />
I don&#8217;t understand the question on Global Warming.  Is JWG asking for metric tons of CO2, a gross percentage, or something like &#8220;enough to make life on this planet miserable over the next century?&#8221;  If there is one issue that screams &#8220;your EEG is flatlining&#8221; to me, it&#8217;s Global Warming.  What&#8217;s the downside of cleaner air, drastically reduced oil dependence (maybe opponents aren&#8217;t serious about fighting terrorism), new renewable energy industries, healthier oceans (and healthier fish populations, naturally), reduced extractive mining operations (no more blowing the tops off mountains and destroying the local water supply with heavy metal contaminants)?  Do we really need to wait to find out who is to blame to do anything?  I just don&#8217;t see how trying to avert a potential global catastrophe registers with some as &#8220;moonbat conspiracy to ruin the American way of life.&#8221;   Unless you are a kool-aid guzzling lump who feels entitled to a &#8220;way of life&#8221; that apparently entails being a grotesque resource hog with an over developed sense of entitlement.  That goes without saying, though.<br />
-<br />
I&#8217;m no expert, but&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclimate.org/" rel="nofollow">these</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.earth.columbia.edu/" rel="nofollow">guys</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/" rel="nofollow">are.</a></p>
<p>If you are a Powerline fan, these blue letters are called &#8220;links,&#8221; and they go to other pages on the &#8220;internet&#8221; where you can learn more about a subject, in this case, Global Warming, from &#8220;experts&#8221; who actually have &#8220;degrees&#8221; in the subject they are discussing.</p>
<p>In other words, feel free to ignore them.</p>
<p>As usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38096</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38096</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;your slam would be valid if I pretended to be an expert on things&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Like investments in the stock market? Please, I&#039;m waiting for another pronouncement about the DOW.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>your slam would be valid if I pretended to be an expert on things</p></blockquote>
<p>Like investments in the stock market? Please, I&#8217;m waiting for another pronouncement about the DOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38095</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38095</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;we defer to the scientific consensus on these subjects&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Fine...answer my question from the global warming thread (which no one will answer): What is the consensus on the amount of human contribution to global warming? Remember, there&#039;s no debate so the answer should be easy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>we defer to the scientific consensus on these subjects</p></blockquote>
<p>Fine&#8230;answer my question from the global warming thread (which no one will answer): What is the consensus on the amount of human contribution to global warming? Remember, there&#8217;s no debate so the answer should be easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38094</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38094</guid>
		<description>As I pointed out, your slam would be valid if I pretended to be an expert on things, but simply share my opinion on things and as noted above, defer to scientists and experts. I know I&#039;supposed to bow to &quot;guy with website&quot; but it ain&#039;t happening.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I pointed out, your slam would be valid if I pretended to be an expert on things, but simply share my opinion on things and as noted above, defer to scientists and experts. I know I&#8217;supposed to bow to &#8220;guy with website&#8221; but it ain&#8217;t happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWG</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38093</link>
		<dc:creator>JWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38093</guid>
		<description>The full quote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I lack the expertise to weigh in on this issue except to say that if the scores of girls were increasing but not as fast as the scores of boys, I doubt that the Post and the educational think tanks would take so sanguine a view.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Explain why this statement is wrong. As a teacher of math and science, I remember very well all the worries about girls falling behind boys, even when their test scores were rising.

As this post of Oliver&#039;s perfectly illustrates, the liberal response to a conservative critique is, &quot;You&#039;re just stupid, so shut up!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>I lack the expertise to weigh in on this issue except to say that if the scores of girls were increasing but not as fast as the scores of boys, I doubt that the Post and the educational think tanks would take so sanguine a view.</p></blockquote>
<p>Explain why this statement is wrong. As a teacher of math and science, I remember very well all the worries about girls falling behind boys, even when their test scores were rising.</p>
<p>As this post of Oliver&#8217;s perfectly illustrates, the liberal response to a conservative critique is, &#8220;You&#8217;re just stupid, so shut up!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheck</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38092</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 01:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38092</guid>
		<description>Again, ferris shows his ignorance.  See, for the most part we defer to the scientific consensus on these subjects.  Asshats like Powerline, on the other hand, ignore the scientists in favor of their own half-baked theories, or cite studies by hard right wing lobbyists.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, ferris shows his ignorance.  See, for the most part we defer to the scientific consensus on these subjects.  Asshats like Powerline, on the other hand, ignore the scientists in favor of their own half-baked theories, or cite studies by hard right wing lobbyists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaveFarris</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverwillis.com/2006/06/27/if-he-only-applied-that-theory-universally/#comment-38091</link>
		<dc:creator>SaveFarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 01:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://improveman.com/ow2008/?p=2270#comment-38091</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mirengoff and the powerliners regularly opine with authority on things they don t remotely understand.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Tell us more about Global Warming.
And the magic of Stem Cells.
And your background in Energy.
Or your experience in combat.
And your creditials in Disaster Preparation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mirengoff and the powerliners regularly opine with authority on things they don t remotely understand.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tell us more about Global Warming.<br />
And the magic of Stem Cells.<br />
And your background in Energy.<br />
Or your experience in combat.<br />
And your creditials in Disaster Preparation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
