Marriage Defenders

2:06 pm EST June 20th, 2006 | Politics | 19 Comments

Three of the top Republican prospects for 2008 are adulterers.

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

19 Responses to “Marriage Defenders”

  1. drpedro says:
    June 20, 2006 at 2:06 pm

    So Ollie, is their personal life an issue or not? I thought you were chastising the media for making it an issue with Hillary weren’t you?

  2. TomY says:
    June 20, 2006 at 2:06 pm

    Not to mention Bush was a cokehead who lied on his security clearance about it.

  3. DCPanic says:
    June 20, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    I wonder if these men would lie to a grand jury, then have their wives claim it’s all a leftwing conspiracy?

  4. TomY says:
    June 20, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    I think that if the media is going to be rooting around in personal lives, we better make sure they’re doing it to both sides and not just ours.

  5. DCPanic says:
    June 20, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    They don’t hold a candle to Willy Clinton. The difference is, his wife doesn’t give a shit.

  6. Rheinhard says:
    June 20, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    DCPanic – I’m willing to find out. How bout you? Let’s put em all under oath and start questioning them on their private lives. Heck, I’ll supply the popcorn!

  7. drpedro says:
    June 20, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    It seems to me their “private lives”, aren’t.

    The difference is they didn’t lie under oath about it.

    You don’t like hypocrites eh ollie?

    So you have been bashing ol’e senator reid about those front row seats at the fights, right? I mean, culture of corruption and all. The republicans saw fit to PAY for their seats you know?

    Oh by the way, no snark about our missile defense system now? Might get a chance to get ahead of the curve if we miss with the imminent N. Korean launch! Oooooh, but what if we DON’T miss…….!

  8. SaveFarris says:
    June 20, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    Nice to see that the Left doesn’t subscribe to the Politics of Personal Destruction.

  9. Oliver Willis says:
    June 20, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    I subscribe as well when hypocrites are involved.

  10. Sundown says:
    June 20, 2006 at 4:06 pm

    If things were right, Gingrich would be most heavily criticized, as he is the most strongly opposed to same-sex marriages using that whole meme of “it denigrates marriage”. Honest conservatives would be ashamed of him for this double-standard, and would not be supporting him at all in his presidental fantasy.

    Of course, just as I have predicted, right-wingers are trying to change the subject. Never mind that Gingrich left his wife when she was recovering from illness in the hospital, because Clinton lied under oath about consentual, albeit adulterous sex.

  11. Oliver Willis says:
    June 20, 2006 at 4:06 pm

    Sen. Reid legitimately got tickets. David Safavian is going to jail, Duke Cunningham is in jail, as is Jack Abramoff. Otherwise “just the same”. And the mythical missile defense is rolled out, I’m sure itll be hailed as a success… like the PATRIOT system.

  12. Rounds77 says:
    June 20, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    In addition: The caption can read: “Do you think this guy will do any better interpreting intelligence?”

  13. Frank_D says:
    June 20, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    I think Gingrich was added to the list to add some “zing” to the article. He’s realy not in the running for the Pesidency.
    Not like Brownback, Frist, or Romney, who were left out (I wonder why?)

  14. z_adura says:
    June 20, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    Gingrich, McCain and Giuliani are strong advocates of the quantity rather than the quality of marriage.

  15. Rounds77 says:
    June 20, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    Let’s leave Frist in. We’ll “Terry Schiavo” him just like Kerry got swift boated. We’ll just juxtapose Terry’s autopsy report with Frist’s “analysis” after viewing the video of her smiling at a balloon. I’ll get popcorn for that.

  16. Frank_D says:
    June 20, 2006 at 8:06 pm

    Rounds77: Which of course had zero to do with marriage, the topic.

  17. Roni says:
    June 20, 2006 at 9:06 pm

    Frank_D Says:
    June 20th, 2006 at 8:55 pm
    Rounds77: Which of course had zero to do with marriage, the topic.

    :) But when Frank draws similar analogies, we’re all meant to sit up and LISTEN!

  18. buma says:
    June 22, 2006 at 7:06 am

    frank, tell us all about marriage. Go ahead and use your own as an example.

  19. Frank_D says:
    June 22, 2006 at 7:06 am

    Classy, buma. Your Mama would be proud.