So, if a smaller liberal commenter who perhaps did their political blog as a side occupation and wished to remain anonymous but was outed and relentless harrased, that s cool then, right?

You know, while blogs do allow for anonymous commenting, and one of the regular writers (not just a cmooenter, but someone with post origination privileges) on my site does post under a pseudonym, it seems to me that anyone who posts anything in a public forum had better be prepared for the fact that anonymity is not guaranteed.

I do give credit to Mr Willis for publishing under his real name — if only he’d take down that ugly picture!

You forgot the country; The People’s Free Republic of Asshatistan

“Dr” Pee
666 Quack Lane
Fugasy, Texas 77777

Now I don’t encourage death threats. But use this address how you wish /snark

Amazing how a campaign called “online integrity” can’t manage to find… integrity. And here we all were thinking Trevino actually meant it or something…

The people posting the info were the the FreeRepublic….FR is who took the information DOWN.

Some individual posted about a bartender. And that is the equivalent of posting the address of a nationally syndicated columnist?

 So, if a smaller liberal commenter who perhaps did their political blog as a side occupation and wished to remain anonymous but was outed and relentless harrased, that s cool then, right

Right.

Well, OK then.

What about a sort of weighted equivalence. Would 3 lesser, sane mortals be equivalent to one Magalang? Five?

But here was the most telling part of the single reference…

Freerepublic.com Web site’s sysop pulled some of the information as it was called to his attention

Right.

I mean big name liberals on par with Malkin

This isn’t about “name” or readership or favorite football teams. It’s about Maglalang deliberately trying to intimidate some liberal commenters.

So, if a smaller liberal commenter who perhaps did their political blog as a side occupation and wished to remain anonymous but was outed and relentless harrased, that’s cool then, right?

It s time liberals understood that conservatives don t believe values apply to them.

Whether or not this is true doesn’t change the fact that Oliver advocates playing dirty. How can you complain about conservatives if you’re going to support OW’s position? Do you believe values apply to liberals like Oliver?

Call me an idealist, but sooner or later, some gifted soul, on the blogosphere, news, or print media, is going to have a “Thomas Paine” moment.

And it will all change.

JK

For others, the “steady as a rock and twice as smart crowd,” to “smear” someone all you have to do is point out their past behavior without even the slightest shred of embellishment. Well, assuming its a liberal “smearing” a wingnut, naturally. I always assumed that was called “reality” as supported by the “facts.” Whoops, my bad.

And how is a one line comment with a link to a story and the “smear-ee”(eh, you get the idea), who really is more qualified to debate the matter, “a new low?”

In the horse race for goofiest kool aid guzzler, I had originally pegged Pedro to win, with who would “place” and “show” being much more heated contests. Damned if I don’t come across a new post every five minutes that doesn’t make me want to change my bets.