The Unhinged?

5:06 pm EST June 7th, 2006 | Politics | 18 Comments

malkinunhinged.jpg

Conversely, the liberal didn’t look “unhinged” at all

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
«
»

18 Responses to “The Unhinged?”

  1. Marty says:
    June 7, 2006 at 6:06 pm

    I normally laugh at what you write, but this time I’m just laughing at you. You really couldn’t think of anything to write today, could you?

    This is quite possibly the lamest post from you in years.

  2. Oliver Willis says:
    June 7, 2006 at 6:06 pm

    So lame you responded to it? What the heck?

  3. Semanticleo says:
    June 7, 2006 at 6:06 pm

    O M G !

    Is the cameraman’s fly open or what?

  4. Rounds77 says:
    June 7, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    “She’s got runaway bride’s eyes,” Kim Carnes.

  5. Jon Swift says:
    June 8, 2006 at 5:06 am

    Ann Coulter Tackles the Menace of Widows and Grieving Mothers…

    In an appearance on the Today Show, promoting her autobiography, Godless, Ann Coulter courageously tackled the frightening menace of widows and grieving mothers. …

  6. Dkelsmith says:
    June 8, 2006 at 6:06 am

    Oliver,

    I don’t agree with a lot of what Michelle Malkin writes, but I do have to ask you this. Do you think it is racist to grab live motion snippets and post them to make her look like a caricature of an Asian woman? I don’t know how many time I have seen this type of thing on websites. If you did a stop motion picture of anyone, you would see expressions like this. Is there any other reason for posting this besides making fun of her asian roots?

  7. bozzy says:
    June 8, 2006 at 11:06 am

    Maybe I’m blind but I fail to see what she thinks is so important about the tip of her nose.

  8. JK says:
    June 8, 2006 at 12:06 pm

    >>Do you think it is racist to grab live motion snippets and post them to make her look like a caricature of an Asian woman?

    Lighten up, cupcake. If you can’t find some humor in Michelle “Crazy Eyes” Malkin’s facial expressions, then perhaps a colonic enema is in order, for you.

    She doesn’t need OW to paint her charicature. She does it all by herself.

    I love the spokesmen and women of the right….such class acts….Limbaugh, Coulter, and Malkin.

    Real class acts, with one common theme: They say controversial things that put themselves in the limelight, and make them money.

    Not a particularly difficult thing to do. In fact, if Bill Clinton had kept it in his pants, we probably wouldn’t even know about “IT.” (I like that one, OW.)

    “IT” calls liberals, “Godless.” Well, I can name 20 liberals off the top of my head in my own circles, that do more “Godlike” and “Christian” things in service to humanity than that wiry old %$#$^ will ever dream of doing.

    The key is not to give a damn about what “IT” says. It’s just noise. Give the real difference makers (Hillary Clinton, John McCain, etc) your ears.

    JK

  9. JK says:
    June 8, 2006 at 12:06 pm

    What the heck..I just wrote what I thought was a decent, thoughtfull response…and the darn thing didn’t post.

    Sigh…

    JK

  10. Frank_D says:
    June 8, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    Dkel: I’m not sure if it’s racist, but it sure is in the “mustache and eyeglasses with magic marker” category.

  11. Rounds77 says:
    June 8, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    Oh Pedro, lighten up! The photo is just a moment when her soul is manifesting itself physically. Nothing more.

  12. drpedro says:
    June 8, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    yea the funny pictures make up for the lack of thoughtful rebuttal.

    It is a bit of a theme around here.

    It is the liberal equivalent of “fart” jokes with 8 year olds. It doesn’t really have to be funny, and it still gets an embarrassed laugh….

  13. drpedro says:
    June 8, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    Or in Rounds case, the attempted funny retort is an attempt to make up for a lack of a thoughtful rebuttal……

  14. Oliver Willis says:
    June 8, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    I capture an actual unmanipulated picture of Malkin, she says we should round up Arabs and intern them… and I’m the bad guy?

  15. drpedro says:
    June 9, 2006 at 12:06 am

    yup, you got it.

  16. Nimrod Gently says:
    June 9, 2006 at 8:06 am

    I was going to post that but I would have been sarcastic.

    It’s a picture of a stupid* racist** bitch* pulling a stupid face**. That’s it. It’s just Oliver pointing and laughing, which I don’t have a problem with this once.

    *this is objective

    **this isn’t

  17. bozzy says:
    June 9, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    Michele Malkin is a stupid woman.

    (Sometimes you just gotta be simple…)

  18. Dkelsmith says:
    June 11, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    @ Oliver,

    No you are not the bad guy, the content of her postings and her words are enough to grill her on. I think the stop motion deal is borderline racist.

    @ JK

    I’m far from a cupcake. So much so that behind that keyboard is the only place you would get away with calling me one.