Please provide a link, I can’t find this anywhere. But it wouldn’t surprise me if this is just another distortion fet to pedro by rush or the blogs which he repeated without being even a little skeptical.

You couldn’t be more obvious, pedro. It’s fascinating to see just how long someone can go without a single fact on their side:

Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., said last week that he was told by Marine Corps officials that the civilians were killed  in cold blood.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12990567/

Idiot.

And you base you assumptions on what? Something you learned getting your PhD in film studies perhaps?

You have no idea what the military told Murtha because you haven’t read any of the coverage have you? Idiot.

I never referred to it, (until you morons brought it out as the Holy Writ on the subject), I am not interested in their “investigation”.

No one in the military told Murtha the Marines “murdered children in cold blood”, ok Paul? No one. Yet that is what he tells the american people and the world.

Unlike movie critics, congress critters need to behave like adults and think about the results of their words.

I DID wait for the facts to come to light unders clinton. The facts “came” to light with a DNA test on a blue dress because the CIC couldn’t bring himself to tell the truth to a sitting judge.

At least give our Marines the same courtesy, let their case come before a judge before setting them up for their firing squad

“… you haven t actually read any of the relevant reporting. Why? Because you re a complete idiot” and you choose to stay that way.

The classics just keep on coming.

First, you have no idea what was in the original Time magazine article because you never read it. The Time article is what people sometime refer to as “investigative reporting” perhaps you’ve heard of the term. The Time article lead directly to the opening of the military investigation. In other words, if not for the work of the media you so disparage there would never have been an official investigation.

Second, since you’re clearly running entirely on blowhard talking points instead of the facts you have no way of understanding that Murtha was reacting to what the military itself told him they had found. Murtha did not decide for himself that Haditha was unprovoked. Military sources told him that this is what the military investigation had found and would subsequently report. You idiots keep coming back suggesting that Murtha is smearing the marines when it is the military itself that told Murtha there were grounds for murder charges. But again, you don’t know shit about anything because you haven’t actually read any of the relevant reporting. Why? Because you’re a complete idiot.

Carry on, Pedro. And good luck in your elusive quest for maturity.

Dumb
Ass

Reporting is not investigation, paul. You are confusing movies with real life again. All I know if that a sitting congressman and leftist “We support the troops” chuckleheads such as yourself said they “murdered in cold blood” and that is really all I care about.

Earlier Pedro: If the article truly REPORTED incident, then I applaud it.

Wow. Now you fail to read even what you yourself have written.

It’s not a question of gospel. The investigation you claim to have been fully behind from the start wouldn’t even be known to you if Time hadn’t broken the story. But you don’t care about the article. So how can you know anything about the investigation?

And again, boo hoo. You called me dumbass. Let me cry about it. Boo hoo.

That hypothetical. You very loudly protest something that you can’t even verify occurred, because you were either too lazy or too scared to look into what the article actually said.

And you believe that they have been “pilloried” without having read any of the actual reporting on the matter? Hilarious. Everything is possible without the facts, pedro. What. An. Idiot.

I stopped giving Time any of my hard earned cash after they wrote an editorial referring to Condi Rice as an “Aunt Jemima”, and Colin Powell as an “uncle tom”

It’s nice to know what he thinks of hypotheticals. “If aliens took over Colorado, I’d be against it!”