So the country has 50M males and 50M plus one female and we have 50M marriages. Marriage has become meaningless. What part of marriage do progressives regard as sacrosanct? Any thing? Any protection for the institution of marriage? Who do you tell to buzz off, marriage is for whoever?
The minute you estasblisha boundary you can be portrayed as bigoted na unfair. What children can’t married? You hate kids? Discrimate against young Americans?

Dugger

However, since homosexuals are more likely to have gender identity problems, and these can contribute greatly to relationship problems, you will usually find that gender identity confusion can affect homosexual relationships more often than heterosexual relationships.

I can only speculate that no one, except perhaps you, BD, believes that the mere existence of homosexual marriage effects existing heterosexual marriages.

Here’s a good story on the issue from the Christian Science Monitor.

I additionally wonder how many Massachusetts couples have come into marital therapist offices weeping about the breakup of their marriage due to the gays who just got married.

In order to be compassionate I have to be ok with a poster who thinks every liberal* hates the troops? No. I think people like drpedro need to be exposed.

* Would that include Joe Lieberman, who’s still quite liberal on a lot of stuff, even though he’s usually ashamed to admit it?

Even if I were sure I knew what  you actually meant, but I turned out to be wrong 999 out of 1000 times, I would stop with the predictions, already.

Try and remeber this next time you start telling liberals what they mean, why they think what they think, and why they’re doing what they’re doing. I can’t believe you are so lacking in ethics that you would get your knickers in a twist when somebody does to you what you’ve been doing ever since I saw you start commenting here. This has to be one of the most perfect examples of hypocrisy ever seen.

And this is the type of individual who will be helping married couples with their problems? I sure hope some of the people who make the decision on whether to certify you have seen your comments on this blog.

In the first place, generalizations about liberals, or conservatives, are not what I call “mind reading.” I am referring to those benighted commenters who, for some reason, can’t (or won’t) deal with the statement I’ve actually made, so they tell me “what I really mean” so they can comment about that, instead of what I’ve actually said.
From Gender Identity Disorder by George A. Rekers, Ph.D.

One of the clinician’s tasks is to differentiate normal adjustment phases in psychosexual development from gender disturbances that require specific treatment intervention (Rekers & Kilgus, 1995; Rekers, 1995a)

Still think I was beating around the bush?

Zython

(And frame, the point has whooshed by your emotional head. ) The difference is we would have open season for marriage. Everybody could get married – not just gays, not just heteros, not just the opposite sex. How are tax laws to be enforced. Why wouldn’t people across the country just “partner” up. After all, marriage has become meaningless. Unless you plan to become a rigid authoritarian right after same sex marriage is approved and deny all other competing ‘marriage’ activists their justice.

We can argue the morality of the issue but don’t pretend social upheaval won’t follow and that there will be a shrill accusatory campaign for additional “marriage freedoms” right after this one concludes.

Dugger

The man is a soon-to-be marital therapist …? His clients HAVE to listen to his advice or (a) be insulted; or (b) beaten to a pulp.

Get it?

Nothing about “submissive” or “dominant”. I’ll leave you to decipher the rest for yourself.

I find it amazing that all you left wing “mind readers” have been nearly 100% wrong in your attempts to tell me “what I mean,” and yet you continue.

Even if I were sure I knew what “you actually meant,” but I turned out to be wrong 999 out of 1000 times, I would stop with the predictions, already.

I find it amazing that all you left wing  mind readers have been nearly 100% wrong in your attempts to tell me  what I mean, and yet you continue.

You say that like conservatives don’t do the same. “Liberals want to outlaw Christianity” my ass. Or more aptly, “The Homosexual Agenda”.

What a load of crap. Dugger, “casual friends” can get married for tax benefites, or citizenship benefits for that matter right now, today if they wanted to. Do they do so in the millions? I don’t know. Do you? Is marriage presently meaningless?

Idiot.

You don’t need to beat around the bush. We all know you mean that one of them must be the “submissive” one and the other must be the “dominate” one. This may suprise you, but a couple can see eachother as equals. *Gasp*

As for the act itself, just take turns!

“As a soon – to – be marital therapist [and soon-to-be divorcee]”

Dear God in Heaven. The man who threatened to kick someone’s ass so hard “his kids would be born dizzy” is going to dispense marital advice.

Let me put it another way, would you want to pay only 50% of your mortgage/rent if it meant that everyone you know or will know will think you’re a furry*? Probably not.

Then again, I’m not suprised by this rhetoric, coming from the same people who argue that the mythical “welfare queens” are a good enough reason to leave every poor person in the country to starve to death.